The real truth about Broners resume

Here's the point blank truth; It's terrible.

Found this sitting in the corner you know what they say polls don't lie.

he was still getting humiliated by a seriously outmatched , undersized and way way overly unfavored joke of a underdog,lol, the beginning of the fight looked like broner was being embarassed, lol, it was embassing and even the hbo crew were talking about how ****y the lil midget was while humiliated the over favorite skillful favorite adrien, lol, this fight was a setbakk for adrien, lol, adrien finished remarkably but the way the midget exposed adrien was just not the thing people in general expected to see from adrien:nono: Pretty much what people expected to see. http://25.media.tumblr.com/20d313173509245fb235809277dea2b7/tumblr_mie1xdQXjS1r3gb3zo1_400.gif

Yeah but you know as well as i do that Broner didn't even get out of 1st gear in the first few rounds. he was still getting humiliated by a seriously outmatched , undersized and way way overly unfavored joke of a underdog,lol, the beginning of the fight looked like broner was being embarassed, lol, it was embassing and even the hbo crew were talking about how ****y the lil midget was while humiliated the over favorite skillful favorite adrien, lol, this fight was a setbakk for adrien, lol, adrien finished remarkably but the way the midget exposed adrien was just not the thing people in general expected to see from adrien:nono:

Broner did not look spectacular in the fight against the midget, he finished him off in a incredible fashion but broner was seriously getting embarassed in the first couple rounds, lol, it did not look good at all when some tiny man like gavin was clokking with combinations all over broners face, lol, gavin looked dominant for the first 2 rounds but gavins lakk of size showed after awhile , thats when he started to just obliberate gavins shortcomings in the size disadvantage department:grumpy: Yeah but you know as well as i do that Broner didn't even get out of 1st gear in the first few rounds.

:pat: Where did i even mention anything about the color of his skin? :lol1: Oooh he has flaws??? Seriously? I mean like seriously?? Wow, for a second there i actually thought Broner was the perfect fighter with not a single flaw in his game. He was taking the fcking p1ss against Rees, let's not kid ourselves. Rees fought a tough fight and credit to him for a brave performance but Broner was on another planet. Don't judge what kind of flaws he has from that performance. If you want to look for some flaws go look at the PDL fight. No one is saying Broner is the perfect fighter who is perfect in every single way. All im saying is he's a huge talent and one i hope to see lighting up our sport for years to come. Not because of the color of his skin. I think the same way about Canelo. About any other fighter who looks like he will provide me and my fellow boxing fans with many entertaining fights over the years. And if you think Broner looks like crap then i'd hate to know your opinion on other fighters. Your blinded by hate. Broner looks spectacular, and you know that deep down. Oh and by the way, he fought a guy called Rees, not Reeves. Broner did not look spectacular in the fight against the midget, he finished him off in a incredible fashion but broner was seriously getting embarassed in the first couple rounds, lol, it did not look good at all when some tiny man like gavin was clokking with combinations all over broners face, lol, gavin looked dominant for the first 2 rounds but gavins lakk of size showed after awhile , thats when he started to just obliberate gavins shortcomings in the size disadvantage department:grumpy:

No hate here you are the hater because you only see the color of his skin and think people are hating on broner. broner talks big, acts big and thinks he is may but looks like crap. I thought highly of broner skill until he fought reeves he got tagged flush to many times, it appears he can't fight on the front foot very well and he likes to get screwed in the a$$ from the front since he legs are way to far apart. He has flaws and because people point them out doest mean they are haters. He has fought nothing but bums and don't give me that crap that demarco was the legit 135 champ. The real champ has been and still is Vazquez. :pat: Where did i even mention anything about the color of his skin? :lol1: Oooh he has flaws??? Seriously? I mean like seriously?? Wow, for a second there i actually thought Broner was the perfect fighter with not a single flaw in his game. He was taking the fcking p1ss against Rees, let's not kid ourselves. Rees fought a tough fight and credit to him for a brave performance but Broner was on another planet. Don't judge what kind of flaws he has from that performance. If you want to look for some flaws go look at the PDL fight. No one is saying Broner is the perfect fighter who is perfect in every single way. All im saying is he's a huge talent and one i hope to see lighting up our sport for years to come. Not because of the color of his skin. I think the same way about Canelo. About any other fighter who looks like he will provide me and my fellow boxing fans with many entertaining fights over the years. And if you think Broner looks like crap then i'd hate to know your opinion on other fighters. Your blinded by hate. Broner looks spectacular, and you know that deep down. Oh and by the way, he fought a guy called Rees, not Reeves.

Broner and Guerrero are taking Abner Mares and Carl Froch spot on the P4P list

you crazy man, Valero had a better record than Broner? you gotta be kidding me, he is only 23 and is already a multi division champion you truly cannot be serious with this comparison, i liked Valero too but this sounds more like irrational hate on Broner they are both undefeated, none of them are better in terms of resume cause they are both undefeated, lol, my problem is that people right now are claiming broners opponents(who are not any good at all) have gotten people to given broner so much attention as broner being the next savior of boxing, lol, cant people wait to call broner the next great somebody after he does something great, lol, all ive seen so far is broner beating 1 real legit opponent(de marco), broner almost losing to a limited fighter(ponce and quintero) and a 5'2 midget embarassing broner on hbo for a couple of rounds.:wave: besides, lol, many people thought broner got beat on those 2 close fights, look at the poll options and youll see what i mean

reason i bring up valero is cause even though broner is undefeated with a pretty bad resume and 1 true undebatable victory, lol, hes already ranked as a p4p fighter while valero would neverbe mentioned as a top p4p fighter, lol, i dont know who and how can the fighters mentioned on broners resume be worthy of p4p mention for broner(Valero wasnt and his resume sukked as bad while being undefeated aswell) you crazy man, Valero had a better record than Broner? you gotta be kidding me, he is only 23 and is already a multi division champion you truly cannot be serious with this comparison, i liked Valero too but this sounds more like irrational hate on Broner

Even HBO were saying that Broner being in the top 10 P4P was out of bounds. But as others have said, he is only 23. If the cast of characters can stay at 140 that are there now when Broner moves up, what a fun, exciting division it will be, as it is already. Lucas, Garcia, Rios, Khan, hell throw Judah and Olusegun in the mix. First 3 are a no-go because he'll avoid one like the plague, publicly stated that he won't fight one, and the other being with Top Rank. But there's still some that can be thrown in the mix.

Even HBO were saying that Broner being in the top 10 P4P was out of bounds. But as others have said, he is only 23. If the cast of characters can stay at 140 that are there now when Broner moves up, what a fun, exciting division it will be, as it is already. Lucas, Garcia, Rios, Khan, hell throw Judah and Olusegun in the mix.

The real truth about Broners resume.....is that he's 23 years old. Give the kid a fcking chance at least you serial haters. He's got a decent resume for a 23 year old. It will get better. When it does though you'll just have another reason to hate on him. Why? Because that's just what you haters do. You've already made your mind up to hate on him. So you'll continue to find ways to do exactly that. Good luck in doing that. Whilst the rest of us will be enjoying a supreme talent lighting up our sport, you'll be hating away looking, hoping and praying to see him lose. Enjoy. everybody knows his age and all but the problem is................ all the hype about him isnt merited based off his resume so before we start calling him the next floyd mayweather or boxings next savior, we gotta see what hes capable of doing or else hed be the next andre berto

The real truth about Broners resume.....is that he's 23 years old. Give the kid a fcking chance at least you serial haters. He's got a decent resume for a 23 year old. It will get better. When it does though you'll just have another reason to hate on him. Why? Because that's just what you haters do. You've already made your mind up to hate on him. So you'll continue to find ways to do exactly that. Good luck in doing that. Whilst the rest of us will be enjoying a supreme talent lighting up our sport, you'll be hating away looking, hoping and praying to see him lose. Enjoy.

Yes Broner must step up and fight better fighters. No more rees types

All I gotta say is he's looked alright so far but he hasn't really fought anyone worth mentioning so don't call him great or P4P..but besides that I can't stand that kid..he's corny as hell..and fails at every joke he tries to make. i agree with what you say and its easy to imitate floyd when someone is fighting against no hopers, lol, i never seen floyd get embarrassed the way the tiny 5' 2 midget embarassed broner last saturday, i hate floyd and broner both but floyd is now a legendary fighter and broner has made a name on pretending to be floyd and trying to fight like floyd, andre berto didtry to imitate floyd and people bought in to bertos crap about skills pay the bills and speed killls, lol, that may be true for some people who fight bums but once you fight a live fighter, lol, then we see if your skills and speed do to help your ugly chin, ask jorge linares , corey spinks and amir khan about their skills and speed, lol, last thing, broner has no charisma whatsoever ,id still pick a limited fighter like ponce de leon over broner based on broners fight against the 5 ' 2 irish looking leprechaun medget from wales :boxing:

All I gotta say is he's looked alright so far but he hasn't really fought anyone worth mentioning so don't call him great or P4P..but besides that I can't stand that kid..he's corny as hell..and fails at every joke he tries to make.

Mikey Garcia is the Ring champion and just destroyed Salido Salido > De Marco and losing to Deleon

The truth about broners resume is there are only 1 or 2 guys at or around his age with better resumes. Kazuto Ioka and Danny Garcia. So for a 23 yo to have the resume he does in this day and age is quite good. I mean look an Mikey Garcia or even Gary Russell

Broner is just the second coming of Andre Berto. Im having fun watching fans comparing his talent with Mayweather. Floyd wouldn't get tagged too many times by a midget like Rees never in his lifetime. ni ce comparison, berto always spoke about skill and speed, lol, then he got clokked but ive never really seen broner get too hurt, ive seen really bad qualities in 2 fights and vs the 5'2 midget for broner so broner has to prove by stepping up to a real challenger