Barker also doesn't want any piece of Golovkin

Because I can. Yes, we can

So why do you keep writing me back?:twak: Because I can.

I couldn't give two fuks if you are Peter Pan, tbh. So why do you keep writing me back?:twak:

Do you actually believe i'm Scott Gilfoid??:You_Rock_ I couldn't give two fuks if you are Peter Pan, tbh.

Oh yeah? . Do you actually believe i'm Scott Gilfoid??:You_Rock_

All in the game, yo:grumble: Oh yeah? .

So do you always listen to other people's interviews then do a write up as your own? All in the game, yo:grumble:

Yes it is. I wrote this article myself. So do you always listen to other people's interviews then do a write up as your own?

Lol, do you work for ************? If so, you're shit. No offense :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony

Lol, Baker's promoter would actually say he sees GGG been too strong for his own fighter lol yea right..Nobody wants none. If you'd read the article exactly you would know that Hearn didn't say that. It was the author. And as stupid Scott might be, you can't say that what Hearn said doesn't fit in to some most recently known blueprint..

Lol, Baker's promoter would actually say he sees GGG been too strong for his own fighter lol yea right..Nobody wants none.

I'm confused, you said Barker didn't want any of Golovkin but I don't see any comments from Barker. I saw comments from Hearn, including one that said they would take a Golovkin fight......is this a troll thread? Yes it is. I wrote this article myself.

Source: bn24 By Scott Gilfoid: Matchroom Sport promoter Eddie Hearn doesn’t like the idea of his fighter middleweight contender Darren Barker (24-1, 15 KO’s) facing WBA World middleweight champion Gennady Golovkin (25-0, 22 KO’s) for his title unless there’s absolutely no other options available for the 30-year-old Barker to fight for a world title in 2013. Presently, Hearn believes there’s a chance for Barker to fight either IBF champion Daniel Geale or WBO champ Peter Quillin for their titles, so it won’t be necessary for Barker to fight Golovkin. Hearn told thaboxingvoice.com “There’s no value in a fight against Golovkin. It’s not a huge fight…If that’s the only world championship fight presenting itself then we’ll take it.” Hearn sees Golovkin as being too strong and too dangerous for Barker to take that fight, and that’s why he’s not particularly excited about making the fight happen. First off, I don’t know that Quillin and/or Geale are going to come beating down Hearns’ door to try and get Barker for one of their title defenses because there’s no real upside to them fighting Barker. He’s not a popular fighter in the United States, and looked awful when he was given a shot against Sergio Martinez in 2011. Barker has fought only once since then, beating British fighter Kerry Hope by 4th round TKO last December. Besides Quillen and Geale, Hearn would like to match Barker against Matthew Macklin, Brian Vera or Sergio Mora. I think Vera or Mora are realistic options for Barker, but Geale, Quillin and Macklin are definitely not doable fights because they have other targets they’re looking at. Macklin could fight Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. this year, and he’s been calling out Geale. Macklin isn’t likely going to want to accept a smaller fight against Barker if he has a chance at getting a bigger money fight. Barker has a fight scheduled next month on March 9th at the Wembley Arena, Wembley, in London, United Kingdom. Hearn still hasn’t found anyone to fill that date, which probably means he’s going to wind up facing an unknown domestic level fodder opponent. I'm confused, you said Barker didn't want any of Golovkin but I don't see any comments from Barker. I saw comments from Hearn, including one that said they would take a Golovkin fight......is this a troll thread?

http://i.imgur.com/Y7FUJ1c.gif

Barker gets far bigger and better money facing Macklin, an ancient Sam Soliman (looking to cash out in style) or Geale sometime in the late summer and a far better chance of landing a belt... .. so despite the phoney/baloney journalism, somewhat ironically this is probably a fairly accurate analysis of where Eddie Hearn's clever head is at. Golvokin's big problem is that he's more feared than a dose of the Bubonic Plague right now and that there are loads of profitable MW match-ups out there which freeze him out of the equation. For example: Geale v Soliman Barker v Macklin Chavez v Martinez 2

Scott Gilfoid is a known liar who does nothing but continually trash British fighters & make stuff up though Barker said he is open to the idea of fighting GGG, Hearn would rather Geale and who could blame him?

Barker definitely didn't look awful against Martinez. He forced Martinez to lead and countered well at times, but he lacks top-level stamina and eventually got taken out by a superior athlete and boxer. Him and Macklin is a great fight. I'd still rather see that than see either of them splattered by Golovkin.

How can you say that Barker doesn't want none of GGG when the article says that it's his promoter who doesn't want it. I'm tired of fans blaming fighters for doing what their promoter advise them to do. Lol at the source and the writer. You're right, he made that up.

Add em to the list

There was an article on here that quoted Barker as saying that it would be smart to avoid GGG but he'd fight him anyway