What makes anyone think he would fight a prime Mosley? Pac wouldn't even fight a 39 year old Mosley.
Kid do u understand that Floyd called out Mosley twice and Mosley declined both? He called him out in 99 and after Mosley beat Vargas.
It's a little late to back pedal now man, you in the Lions den now son.......
and BTW in your opinion what's pac best win?
What do you mean backpedal? What exactly am I backpedaling on? About Mayweather? I'm honestly not sure, that requires a little more thought than I'm willing to give it right now. Just without thinking too much, I'd argue that Mayweather's wins over Corrales and Castillo in the rematch are arguable with Mosley over Oscar, maybe people will tell me I'm dead wrong about that.
Barrera 1, and that's a definitively better win than Mosley over Oscar. I don't even see the argument otherwise.
yea but they are both much smaller men than Shane. Especially pac.
Very true, but I think Pac could handle the power well enough. Mosley's power is pretty good, but not overwhelming. I don't have a problem with people picking Mosley, I just can't stand when people say "Mosley would knock both these guys out easily, he was a monster!!"
EDIT: I'm not even thinking much about Mayweather/Mosley to be honest. I am almost 100% certain Mosley isn't knocking Mayweather out, and he's sure as hell not winning a decision over prime Mayweather.
That was young, prime Shane with his reflexes, movement, handspeed, and power. He gave Pacquiao cramps from just moving a little bit on his feet and not really doing anything else. He also survived against a version of Pacquiao that was supposed to knock him out. 2000 Mosley beats any version of WW Pacquiao. Mayweather has his hands full but because he boxes way better, he'd be able to outbox prime Shane.
mayweather nearly got sparked by the only punches mosley landed, what makes you think a prime mosley doesn't land one then kill floyd in about 1 rd?
That was young, prime Shane with his reflexes, movement, handspeed, and power. He gave Pacquiao cramps from just moving a little bit on his feet and not really doing anything else. He also survived against a version of Pacquiao that was supposed to knock him out. 2000 Mosley beats any version of WW Pacquiao. Mayweather has his hands full but because he boxes way better, he'd be able to outbox prime Shane.
I respect your opinion but look at the ricky hatton fight he had problems keeping him off of him most of that fight, you see how relentless a prime shane was on oscar, that version of shane>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ricky hatton and shane was alot faster,elusive and hit way harder than ricky hatton. by that second half of that fight pbf would be wore down considerably from eating all of that leather
No its not. Pac has beaten far better fighters than Mosley ever did, and Mayweather beat the same caliber of opponents more convincingly.
yea but they are both much smaller men than Shane. Especially pac.
That was young, prime Shane with his reflexes, movement, handspeed, and power. He gave Pacquiao cramps from just moving a little bit on his feet and not really doing anything else. He also survived against a version of Pacquiao that was supposed to knock him out. 2000 Mosley beats any version of WW Pacquiao. Mayweather has his hands full but because he boxes way better, he'd be able to outbox prime Shane.
No it sure as hell is not better than Pac's best. You sound like you're overrating Oscar as well. Not surprising, a lot of this site overrates both Oscar and Mosley.
EDIT: I'm not sure about Mayweather. You may be right there, I'll need someone to start listing the wins they think are comparable before I say for sure about that.
It's a little late to back pedal now man, you in the Lions den now son.......
and BTW in your opinion what's pac best win?
The mosley victory over a prime golden boy is better than any pbf victory he might have on his resume and it's equal to pac's greatest win also
No it sure as hell is not better than Pac's best. You sound like you're overrating Oscar as well. Not surprising, a lot of this site overrates both Oscar and Mosley.
EDIT: I'm not sure about Mayweather. You may be right there, I'll need someone to start listing the wins they think are comparable before I say for sure about that.
You see the way that version of mosley was exchanging with the bigger stronger golden boy and he never stop coming he took everything oscar threw and came back for more............
that was the EPO version of Shane.....
anyways he still had that same slugging/speed style that would NEVER beat a mayweather or a pacquiao......
No its not. Pac has beaten far better fighters than Mosley ever did, and Mayweather beat the same caliber of opponents more convincingly.
The mosley victory over a prime golden boy is better than any pbf victory he might have on his resume and it's equal to pac's greatest win also
To say a prime mosley wasn't as good a may and pac in their prime is vastly underrating him.....
Lol no its not. Its the absolute truth. Lol where do these myths come from?
Inb4 I'm so sorry goes on his usual tirade on how Mosley is a sted head, a juicer, EPOsley etc.
Only topic worth discussing when SugarPED EPOsley is mentioned. His entire career is in question.
That "version" that you're talking about might very well be the Shane that was doped out of his mind, so no, he loses to both.
To say a prime mosley wasn't as good a may and pac in their prime is vastly underrating him.....
No its not. Pac has beaten far better fighters than Mosley ever did, and Mayweather beat the same caliber of opponents more convincingly.
I think you got a little too excited over watching that video. It is very exciting to watch, but that is a faded De La Hoya. He always fades late in the fight. Pac and May will always be better. And also, I think there's reason to believe Mosley was on PED's back then, but can't remember if it was during this time.
That may be so but that was still a prime or very close to prime golden boy....and after taking heat during the course of that fight i'm sure he had no choice but to fade lol
Mosley wasn't slick. Oscar won exchanges. Far lesser fighters than Pac won exchanges. Pac throws just as fast and is very unpredictable in the middle of a firefight.
Mosley's a brawler. He was never slick, or smart, or hard to hit. I'm not saying Pac destroys him, but I would feel good picking Pac in that fight. To act like Mosley was ever as good a fighter as prime Pac or Mayweather is vastly overrating him.
To say a prime mosley wasn't as good a may and pac in their prime is vastly underrating him.....
Based off the many slicker, faster, younger and harder punchers Pac has fought that were similar to Shane? >__>...
And Devils, there's a reason only Shane stepped up against them both.
Mosley wasn't slick. Oscar won exchanges. Far lesser fighters than Pac won exchanges. Pac throws just as fast and is very unpredictable in the middle of a firefight.
Mosley's a brawler. He was never slick, or smart, or hard to hit. I'm not saying Pac destroys him, but I would feel good picking Pac in that fight. To act like Mosley was ever as good a fighter as prime Pac or Mayweather is vastly overrating him.
I absolutely agree, Both Winky and Vernon would have destroyed all of the above as well.
no way Forrest beats Floyd. Winky maybe but thats still only due to being naturally much bigger. He's not on his level in a P4P sense
13y ago
This version of sugar shane mosley beats pac and mayweather@147 | BoxingScene Community