Whose win over Pac is bigger than the other?

bump for more opinions

Marquez win was more emphatic and on teh face of it youd have to give him the edge but when you look deeper - Erik beat Pac who went onto greatness whereas Marquez beat Pac when he was coming off a loss and hadnt looked good in years. Also Marquez' win is clouded in suspicion because he had so much more power in that fight than he did in his previous 50 fights. That doesnt happen suddleny at 40 years of age. A man who is willing to drink his own urine is willing to do anything to get an advantage so I reckon his new "conditioner" played a part in that fight.

Well Morales beat a poisoned Pacquiao who had the wrong socks on = Not a good win And Marquez needed to be on steroids to knock out an old religious unmotivated Pacqquiao, who was probably poisoned and had on wrong socks = Not a good win. It's a draw :beerchug:

Morales....

hard to say..i'd slightly favor erik morales' win though. pac was younger and in his physical prime when he met morales.. and pac was pretty much steam rolling through his opponents at that point...whereas the pac that marquez beat was seen by many at that point as being on the decline (physically and mentally). the height of pac's career was at 2009-2010 though.

I say morales. Why? Because he clearly beat PAC first (good fight by the way). First fight PAC had with Marquez was close. Marquez beat PAC convincingly in the 3rd fight I believe. What you're saying does not make sense. Marquez gained a clear victory over Pacquiao by knocking him the fuck out.

lol at manny being prime in '05. physical prime, arguably, but he was still too heavily reliant on his left then. marquez beat a more complete fighter. pacs previous fight with bradley was unimpressive but he looked pretty much like the old pac before jmm ko'd him. also, jmm was getting hurt badly in the fight to, which makes his ko'd pretty epic.

Morales, but both are good. Pacquiao was prime in 2005, he was past prime-still good in 2012.

Holy Jesus bro, the answer to your question is as obvious as a whore on a hard on. C'mon man, Marquez knocked Manny into another dimension, scientists are still trying to get him back. I haven't seen anyone KO'd that bad since that Russian guy in Rocky IV annihilated Apollo Creed, and somehow I think Manny's was a bit worse. The only crucial difference is that Manny survived, Creed didn't. This is my opinion.

Erik Morales win or the JMM win? discuss Holy Jesus bro, the answer to your question is as obvious as a whore on a hard on. C'mon man, Marquez knocked Manny into another dimension, scientists are still trying to get him back. I haven't seen anyone KO'd that bad since that Russian guy in Rocky IV annihilated Apollo Creed, and somehow I think Manny's was a bit worse. The only crucial difference is that Manny survived, Creed didn't.

I say morales. Why? Because he clearly beat PAC first (good fight by the way). First fight PAC had with Marquez was close. Marquez beat PAC convincingly in the 3rd fight I believe.

nope pacquiao marquez ko'd was a much better fighter but but....JMM ko'd a past prime Pac who recently "lost" to Bradley

maybe, but Erik beat a more prime Pac who went on to win 3 more division belts nope pacquiao marquez ko'd was a much better fighter

I don't understand why people ask questions when they already know the answers to them themselves.... maybe im askin for other opinions, so whose win do you think is greater?

jmm for obvious reasons maybe, but Erik beat a more prime Pac who went on to win 3 more division belts

I don't understand why people ask questions when they already know the answers to them themselves....

jmm for obvious reasons