Mike Tyson vs. George Foreman - Who Wins?

I think either could beat each other on any given day. But I go for foreman as he's greater

Only crazy idiots say george nobody that slow basic or easy to read beat mike so why would George makes no sense he would be destroyed

Prime Foreman vs. Prime Tyson. Surprised to see all of the opts for Foreman, but I can understand where they come from. I still say a prime Tyson is too elusive for Foreman.

Tyson is overrated any version of Foreman would kill him

Prime Foreman would win..now if you talking the 2nd version of Foreman that one that lost to Holyfield..then Tyson would destroy him.

Foreman would be too slow for Tyson. (If both in their primes.)

Foreman by decapitation. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android

I agree with this: Tyson's defense was fundamentally sound. Very good mechanics, well schooled. It wasn't, however, well timed or effective. Tyson got hit. A lot. Even by bums he blew away. Tyson doesn't beat Foreman because he can't do what he needs to win: Avoid getting hit early and often. If Jesse Ferguson can land every other uppercut and right hand he threw early, I think George can connect with at least a similar frequency, and I don't think any heavyweight in history can absorb flush bombs from Foreman and not suffer serious adverse effects. Ali managed it, but he took his worst licks to the body, and fought entirely on the defensive. Tyson would be eat the big shit trying to come in and throw. It's a fun fight, and Tyson is a beast, but there is such a thing as a nuclear style disadvantage. Ask Joe Frazier.

Side me with prime Foreman

Just because Foreman beat Frazier, doesn't mean he'd beat Tyson. Tyson was very skilled in his prime and would have been too much for Foreman.

Foreman was tailor made for Tyson.

Come on now, you must specify which version of George.

foremans style was anti-tyson