I mean if pacquiao would have koed jmm like he was supposed to and came to the bradley fight with a bunch of momentum. i bet no judge would have dared to score it for bradley
it seems to me like the judges were afraid of receiving the same backlash of the jmm decision so they were more inclined to give rounds to bradley
At first i thought the decision was part of a scheme to make more money on a rematch but idk know
no
Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2
people saw right through it though
fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board
This is pretty much what happened
Absolutely.
There was outrage after the Pac-JMM III robbery and they made this one up. Both fights had clear winners and neither was given the W they earned.
kinda like the first 2 barrera vs morales fights where the judges got it wrong both times
I think what had a bigger impact was Pacquiao keeping the old men waiting because he wanted to watch the Celtics game.
But the JMM outcome might have had something to do with it. Receiving his comeuppance for winning a gift decision in his last fight out.
Absolutely.
There was outrage after the Pac-JMM III robbery and they made this one up. Both fights had clear winners and neither was given the W they earned.
no
Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2
people saw right through it though
fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board
Explain that one?
yes, i think it did for some reasons. judges became critical to pac during the bradley match to regain some of the damages after the marquez III, thinking that they are actually doing a great job balancing things, but then it just worsen.. i hope they just gave marquez the win and bradley the L.
If Pac won so convincingly and it was such a robbery, why is it that Bradley had not one mark or bruise on his face all while breaking his ankle and foot in the second round?
what the fuck is with this logic?
Bradley lost 9 outta 12 rds, so what if he wasn't busted up? :laugh:
people wanna give Bradley credit just for not getting Cotto'd
you can get your ass kicked without getting cut or swollen
no
Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2
people saw right through it though
fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board
If Pac won so convincingly and it was such a robbery, why is it that Bradley had not one mark or bruise on his face all while breaking his ankle and foot in the second round?
no
Arum knew Floyd was just plain never gonna fight Pac
so he set up the robbery to ensure a Pac-Bradley 2
people saw right through it though
fight wasn't that good and it didn't sell much
so it's Pac-JMM 4 while Bradley goes back to the drawing board