Broner is better than James Toney skillwise.
The kid has the whole package. High workrate, offensive and defensive brilliance.
I really hope this is a joke.
Compared to Mayweather and Toney nothing about his style flows right on either offense or (especially) defense, it comes out looking jerky and unnatural despite it's effectiveness (i.e. intentionally adopted rather than born and bred). Incidentally, clearly the way to approach him is not flatfootedly pressing straight into a stationary Broner over and over.
There's similarities but I wouldn't go as far as calling him a mini Toney
Broner is better than James Toney skillwise.
The kid has the whole package. High workrate, offensive and defensive brilliance.
Hells no.
I was thinking the exact same thing......for anyone saying this is the future this is something different then please watch James toneys career and you will see many similarities. Actually his offense is a more active James Toney. The difference being that broner is actually in shape versus toney being out of shape and having to pace himself. The one difference with Toney is that Toney is more fluid and switches on the inside from Orthodox to southpaw....IMO