Well, I watched the fight live on TV, and I'm a little surprised some of you are scoring it as close as 115-113 etc.
I didn't have any particular feeling to any of these fighters going into the match - personally I would struggle to give Huck any more than 3 rounds.
Just the same pattern all the way through - Huck throws a few big shots, hits all glove, gets backed up and shows himself to be absolutely clueless inside, getting hit by uppercut after uppercut.
Wasn't expected anything else from the decision but that was not close at all in my opinion.
He's saying he won the fight and wanted to make history as 42 y.o. champion but was robbed by the judges, and he's saying things like this are ruining the sport. :boxing:
he said that he clearly won, that he knows it and everyone in the crowd knows that. and that he cannot believe this robbery really happened.
Thanks dudes, I thought he won as well.
How about Huck moves up; Afolabi and Arslan fight for the title?
Huck is a Super Champion now
so I think Ofalabi maybe gets promoted from interim champion to regular champion?
he said that he clearly won, that he knows it and everyone in the crowd knows that. and that he cannot believe this robbery really happened.
What did he say? Guru changed the channel on us
He's saying he won the fight and wanted to make history as 42 y.o. champion but was robbed by the judges, and he's saying things like this are ruining the sport. :boxing:
Uhhh ohhh.. don't say anything bad or the WBO will fine you and make a bid deal out of it
What did he say? Guru changed the channel on us
He's saying he won the fight and wanted to make history as 42 y.o. champion but was robbed by the judges, and he's saying things like this are ruining the sport. :boxing:
No it was an Italian. They have a long history of corruption.
I was..... joking.
I don't think a blatant conflict of interest could come anywhere close to happening