The stoppage was premature in my opinion but not bad. That said this fights outcome was decided before round 1 started. Rios gettin that next Pac fight.
every round wasthisclose. even the fifth where Alvarado had his most success, Rios was in it. 4-2 the other way or 3-3 is not out of the question. IMO, during this telephone Booth fight, Rios was backing up Mike or standing his ground roughly 70% of the time. in a war like that where two guys are trying to impose their will, the fighter advancing forward more will probably get the nod. there was no fix in.
what a joke. anyone who watched the abril fight should be disgusted by this. clearly the setup was in play again. fucqing arum playing 3 moves in advance again
Ok. I only saw Rios winning 1 and 6. Had Alvarado winning 2 through 5. Its ok if one judge had a tie but both and the judge having rios winning by 2 rds is bullsh1t.
Completely agree.
I had Alvarado up 4 rounds to 2, identical to Lederman's card.
Same here. If 1 judge had it that way ok but 2 judges and to have rios up by 2 rounds is absurd.
i saw Alvarados jab get credit i thought he was flickin it a lot, n i felt Rios shorter punches i think were harder thats why he weaken that jaw n had him all cut up
Ok. I only saw Rios winning 1 and 6. Had Alvarado winning 2 through 5. Its ok if one judge had a tie but both and the judge having rios winning by 2 rds is bullsh1t.
no way was rios winning for sure
i had it a tie
Ok. I only saw Rios winning 1 and 6. Had Alvarado winning 2 through 5. Its ok if one judge had a tie but both and the judge having rios winning by 2 rds is bullsh1t.