Better resume: Mayweather or Hopkins???

Cotto was ready to fight Mayweather after May beat Hatton and May retired from the sport. He ducked Margarito he's ducking Pac now that's way 50 cent riding with pac now. He won't fight Martinez but Cotto will yeah May has a better resume then B Hop. B hop has some loses but that because he 's got balls to fight guys in their prime 4 corners kid. We can do this all night but I got s**t to do I am out. Everything about BH is better than Floyd. He beat the Tarvers, and Pavliks of this world when he was a old man and wasnt supposed to. When you tell BH he cant do something he says i'll prove you wrong. When people say Floyd cant do something, his body language says i agree, he wont fight Sergio will he now? He wont even drain Sergio down a division and fight him. The Tarvers and Pavliks are on the same level as Cotto and SSM, yet people think Floyd should be at least p4p no2 behind Pac for those wins. BH taking JC to a split decision is better than anything Floyd has ever done. Floyd right now if you are kind to him is about 3 or 4 p4p.

It was well known back in 2005 that Top Rank and Cotto had no intention of making Floyd-Cotto because "Cotto wasn't ready yet". And as far as Tszyu at 140, Floyd wanted to fight the Hatton-Tszyu winner in Late 2005, but Tszyu lost and Hatton said he wasn't ready yet. Floyd-Hatton happened anyway at the best time possible anyway. Forrest at 147??? What??? Forrest's last fight at 147 was in 2003 and he was up at 154 by 2005. That was never even a remote possibility. Margarito in Late 2006 was the most legit that could have happened out of all those, and I'm sure Floyd had Oscar in the back of his mind. That's the one that should have happened though. And Casamayor at 130, Floyd didn't duck him. I just don't see Floyd ducking Casamayor to fight the #1 SFW and #5 P4P fighter in Corrales, than moving up to 135 to fight the #1 LW Castillo. When you break down the wins, which is ALL that adds to a fighters resume, Floyd has the better resume.Cotto was ready to fight Mayweather after May beat Hatton and May retired from the sport. He ducked Margarito he's ducking Pac now that's way 50 cent riding with pac now. He won't fight Martinez but Cotto will yeah May has a better resume then B Hop. B hop has some loses but that because he 's got balls to fight guys in their prime 4 corners kid. We can do this all night but I got s**t to do I am out.

So yo think Money May has a better Resume then B Hop. All I am saying its hard to defend a fighter like Mayweather. I like the way the guy fights but I would have liked a lot more 50 50 fights on his resume. like a Cotto at 140 Or a kostya at 140 Or maybe a Forrest fight at 147. Margarito at 147 even a casa fight at 130. B Hop took those risks is all I am saying we could agree to disagree. It was well known back in 2005 that Top Rank and Cotto had no intention of making Floyd-Cotto because "Cotto wasn't ready yet". And as far as Tszyu at 140, Floyd wanted to fight the Hatton-Tszyu winner in Late 2005, but Tszyu lost and Hatton said he wasn't ready yet. Floyd-Hatton happened anyway at the best time possible anyway. Forrest at 147??? What??? Forrest's last fight at 147 was in 2003 and he was up at 154 by 2005. That was never even a remote possibility. Margarito in Late 2006 was the most legit that could have happened out of all those, and I'm sure Floyd had Oscar in the back of his mind. That's the one that should have happened though. And Casamayor at 130, Floyd didn't duck him. I just don't see Floyd ducking Casamayor to fight the #1 SFW and #5 P4P fighter in Corrales, than moving up to 135 to fight the #1 LW Castillo. When you break down the wins, which is ALL that adds to a fighters resume, Floyd has the better resume.

Hopkins! LANDSLIDE

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Floyd is on his 5th weight class at 154, already under sized there. Even if Sergio moved back down and wasn't affected by the weight and beat Floyd, it's a good bigger guy beating a great smaller guy, similar to Hopkins-Wright/Floyd-JMM. Floyd is suppose to win pretty much every fight, so it's his fault that he's predicted to win all the time??? He wanted to fight Winky Wright in 2005, who priced himself out of the fight, that was well documented. He tried to fight Shane Mosley in 2005-2006, who openly said he had no intention of fighting Mayweather anytime soon because he had other plans. And than when EVERYONE wanted to see it and Floyd/Shane fought, people s**t on that win, even though Pacquiao openly avoided Shane in 2009-2010 and when everyone was saying Floyd-Mosley needs to happen. And Cotto is about as past it as Oscar was in 2003-2004. He can still fight and at a high level. So yo think Money May has a better Resume then B Hop. All I am saying its hard to defend a fighter like Mayweather. I like the way the guy fights but I would have liked a lot more 50 50 fights on his resume. like a Cotto at 140 Or a kostya at 140 Or maybe a Forrest fight at 147. Margarito at 147 even a casa fight at 130. B Hop took those risks is all I am saying we could agree to disagree.

I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. Floyd is on his 5th weight class at 154, already under sized there. Even if Sergio moved back down and wasn't affected by the weight and beat Floyd, it's a good bigger guy beating a great smaller guy, similar to Hopkins-Wright/Floyd-JMM. Floyd is suppose to win pretty much every fight, so it's his fault that he's predicted to win all the time??? He wanted to fight Winky Wright in 2005, who priced himself out of the fight, that was well documented. He tried to fight Shane Mosley in 2005-2006, who openly said he had no intention of fighting Mayweather anytime soon because he had other plans. And than when EVERYONE wanted to see it and Floyd/Shane fought, people s**t on that win, even though Pacquiao openly avoided Shane in 2009-2010 and when everyone was saying Floyd-Mosley needs to happen. And Cotto is about as past it as Oscar was in 2003-2004. He can still fight and at a high level.

No I don't give him credit for those three fights when he fought those guys those guys were past there primes. Come on man Hopkins got the better resume he has fought the fighters when he was suppose to. Not years later B Hop fought guys when they were on top. I don't care who his opponents fought at the time he fought them you didn't know who was going to win while Mayweather fought most of the time where you know he was going to win. Now he can be fighting Martinez at 154 like you said he fought De la Hoya at 154 but he won't fight Martinez at 154. We both know that he doesn't take the risks that B hop takes no doubt.

I would have to say B Hop because he fought the guys in their prime. He retired Trinidad he knockout De La Hoya made Winky disappear schooled Tarver and Pavlik beat Pascal twice lost to Dawson and Calzaghe but at least he fought them. Mayweather fought Corrales and Castillo and Hatton in their Prime. I give him Props for that he gave Marquez a boxing lesson like no other I don't care what the weight was he beats Marquez on his worst day. I don't give him credit for wins over De La Hoya,Mosley or or Cotto he fought those guys way past their Primes. B Hop wins this poll no doubt. If Mayweather were to fight Pacman and beat him he still should have fought him like three years ago. That's Mayweather for you. While B Hop is 47 years old and wants to fight the best we can't say the same about Mayweather that's for sure. You don't give Floyd credit for those 3 wins??? De La Hoya in 2004 was coming off a crappy outing against Sturm, and that fight against Oscar was "fishy" to say the least. In 2007 he was a couple years older, but Floyd went up in weight to Oscar's weight and when Oscar was the #3 SWW and beat him. Those wins are about equal. Cotto isn't in his prime but really hasn't been since 2008. He's still a Top fighter though and was still the #1 SWW, the best fight available aside from Manny at that point in time. And it was Mosley's own damn fault that fight didn't happen in 2005-2006. He srtaight up avoided even talking about fighting Floyd those two years. Floyd still got Shane when he was the #2 WW and #3 P4P fighter coming off beating Margarito, everyone wanted that fight when it happened.

...so you're saying BHOP fought guys in their prime...but damn near every one you mentioned was either in the wrong weight class or ended up beating him.

I would have to say B Hop because he fought the guys in their prime. He retired Trinidad he knockout De La Hoya made Winky disappear schooled Tarver and Pavlik beat Pascal twice lost to Dawson and Calzaghe but at least he fought them. Mayweather fought Corrales and Castillo and Hatton in their Prime. I give him Props for that he gave Marquez a boxing lesson like no other I don't care what the weight was he beats Marquez on his worst day. I don't give him credit for wins over De La Hoya,Mosley or or Cotto he fought those guys way past their Primes. B Hop wins this poll no doubt. If Mayweather were to fight Pacman and beat him he still should have fought him like three years ago. That's Mayweather for you. While B Hop is 47 years old and wants to fight the best we can't say the same about Mayweather that's for sure.

First of all the tarver win was way better then Floyd over Castillo since Hopkins set a record in that fight and dominated while floyd should have lost once and beating Pavlik was huge since he was the lineal champ in the division Hopkins dominated for years. and he was 20 years younger. That was Hopkins beating his successor from another generation. All you did was rationalize everything to favor floyd. In real life Floyds resume full of ducking and dodging is no where near Hopkins. accomplishment wise record wise and even quality of opponent wise since Mayweather beats them when they are old and washed up While Hopkins beats them while he is old and washed up. Both were good. Both went up in weight and fought the best at that weight. Castillo's resume is superior to Tarver's. Tarver's beat Jones, Johnson, and Woods. Castillo has beaten Johnston, Bazan, Casamayor, Lazcano, J. Diaz, and Corrales. And Floyd beat him clearly in the rematch. Oh so beating Pavlik was huge, and it was a very good win for Hopkins, but Floyd beating Genaro when he did, Corrales when he did, Castillo when he did, wasn't huge??? C'mon man, and all you are doing is making everything go the other way to fit your argument, so quit playing like you're neutral or unbias, you're one of the more bias around here. Pavlik has two good wins, Taylor and Rubio, that's it. When you break down their biggest wins, Hopkins has the biggest win over Trinidad. That was a bit bigger than Floyd beating Corrales when he did, I give Hopkins that. But their other biggest wins, Floyd's are better. Castillo, De La Hoya, Cotto, Hatton > Pavlik, Pascal, Tarver, De La Hoya. Wright and Marquez were similar situations, fighting Top 10 P4P fighters and great fighters, but not at their weights. Floyd over Marquez is better than Hopkins over Wright though. Wright never in his career, before or after fighting Hopkins, proved anything at 170 lbs. Marquez, after fighting Floyd, arguably beat the #1 WW in the world at 144 lbs. Plus, Marquez is greater than Wright is, and proved he can fight at that weight. That leaves Hopkins with Mercado, Jackson, Johnson, Allen, Eastman, Joppy, and Holmes. And it leaves Floyd with Genaro, Manfredy, G. Vargas, C. Hernandez, Chavez, Corley, Gatti, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley, and Ortiz. You can't possibly favor Hopkins there.

bernards fought so many more big names, sometimes fought alot of them twice. doesnt fight once a year. oldest champion in history bernards done it all imo

didn't read Oh Ok Let me give you the cliff notes You:blowjob: Floyd

No. I said Wright never did anything at 170 before fighting Hopkins and never did after fighting him either. I compared that to Marquez. JMM had never done anything at 144 before fighting Floyd, but after fighting Floyd he did just arguably beat the #1 WW in the world at the same weight. So I'd give Floyd more props for dominating Marquez at 144 than I do for Hopkins beating Wright at 170. Hatton wasn't at his best weight class but it was 100% his fault it didn't happen at 140, and at least Hatton, though he struggled, won a title at WW over Collazo, who was a Top 5 WW at the time Hatton fought him. Hopkins beating Oscar and Floyd beating Oscar are about equal. Oscar was coming off a bad outing against Sturm and the fight ended in a controversial fake loooking way, but he was a couple years younger. Oscar was coming off a nice KO win prior to fighting Floyd and was the #3 ranked SWW still. So those are close to equal really. Trinidad is better than Floyd's Corrales win, though going in Corrales was still a huge win for Floyd. Than I'd say the Castillo and Tarver wins are about even. Castillo was the #1 LW coming off good wins and the best LW of his era, with wins over Johnston, Bazan, Casamayor, Lazcano, Corrales, and J. Diaz. Tarver was the best LHW in the world and Hopkins went up in weight, and he does have wins over Jones, Johnson, and Woods, but I think Castillo has the better wins than Tarver overall. Than I'd take beating Hatton and Cotto over beating Pavlik and Pascal. Pavlik only ever beat Taylor, and Pascal's only wins are over Dawson and Diaconu. Hatton has beaten Tszyu, Collazo, Urango, Lazcano, and Malignaggi. Cotto has beaten Torres, Malignaggi, Judah, Mosley, Clottey, and Foreman. Both are better wins than Pavlik and Pascal, though those are still two good wins for Hopkins. Then that leaves Hopkins with Mercado, Jackson, Allen, Holmes, Joppy, and Eastman. And Floyd is left with Genaro, Manfredy, G. Vargas, C. Hernandez, Chavez, Corley, Gatti, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley, and Ortiz. That clearly and favors Floyd, and that's not even really close. Floyd just has a deeper resume, and pretty much even in terms of big wins, but Hopkisn having the biggest win. First of all the tarver win was way better then Floyd over Castillo since Hopkins set a record in that fight and dominated while floyd should have lost once and beating Pavlik was huge since he was the lineal champ in the division Hopkins dominated for years. and he was 20 years younger. That was Hopkins beating his successor from another generation. All you did was rationalize everything to favor floyd. In real life Floyds resume full of ducking and dodging is no where near Hopkins. accomplishment wise record wise and even quality of opponent wise since Mayweather beats them when they are old and washed up While Hopkins beats them while he is old and washed up.

haha hows justin jukko, greg vargas, ndou, brusseles, gatti, mitchell and corley. Mayweather would have to have fought Pac Martinez Canalo Margarito and a few other guys who haven't become famous yet to match Hopkins resume. Only a stan floyd cheerleader would say otherwise. By the way hows Mayweathers latest extended vacation going? Do you write him often:blowjob::blowjob::blowjob:? Saying Hopkins gets no credit on his resume for losing to Jones or Taylor or whoever is stupid floyd boy logic. That would be like saying Hagler gets no credit for fighting Sugar Ray Leonard when it's one of the fights that defined his career. Of course it's better to win but you get credit for taking on the best which is something Hopkins does and Floyd will not do ever. How can you be such a rabid fan of a guy who won't take on his biggest challenges. If you want a fantasy hero why don't you just watch the WWF instead of real sports were the best are supposed to compete? Floyd has great skills but his attitude towards boxing is a disgrace. He claims to be the greatest of all time but his attitude towards proving it is non existent. didn't read

BH has a better career. You can go back and forth comparing opponents and say this opponent was better for BH, or that opponent was better for Floyd and not conclude anything concrete with it. But BH fights, Floyd dont. BH fight as a senior citizen, Floyd dont fight as a junior. The guys are not comparable, BH has a better career even though he may even be more horrible to watch than Floyd. And its hard to find a fighter as horrible as Floyd. Floyd wouldn't even fight in his prime and these stans think his resume is comparable to Bhop. Last time I checked Hopkins didn't retire instead of entering the middleweight tournament. That's about what Floyd did. And it's to early to tell but if Gaynever wins a championship in his forties I'll streak the world series that year.

why would anyone take your posts on Floyd seriously? haha hows justin jukko, greg vargas, ndou, brusseles, gatti, mitchell and corley. Mayweather would have to have fought Pac Martinez Canalo Margarito and a few other guys who haven't become famous yet to match Hopkins resume. Only a stan floyd cheerleader would say otherwise. By the way hows Mayweathers latest extended vacation going? Do you write him often:blowjob::blowjob::blowjob:? Saying Hopkins gets no credit on his resume for losing to Jones or Taylor or whoever is stupid floyd boy logic. That would be like saying Hagler gets no credit for fighting Sugar Ray Leonard when it's one of the fights that defined his career. Of course it's better to win but you get credit for taking on the best which is something Hopkins does and Floyd will not do ever. How can you be such a rabid fan of a guy who won't take on his biggest challenges. If you want a fantasy hero why don't you just watch the WWF instead of real sports were the best are supposed to compete? Floyd has great skills but his attitude towards boxing is a disgrace. He claims to be the greatest of all time but his attitude towards proving it is non existent.

why would anyone take your posts on Floyd seriously?

BH has a better career. You can go back and forth comparing opponents and say this opponent was better for BH, or that opponent was better for Floyd and not conclude anything concrete with it. But BH fights, Floyd dont. BH fight as a senior citizen, Floyd dont fight as a junior. The guys are not comparable, BH has a better career even though he may even be more horrible to watch than Floyd. And its hard to find a fighter as horrible as Floyd.

who'd hatton beat at 147 and did he look like crap and nearly lost at 147 prior to Floyd? Because you were pointing guy's best weight classes when it came to B-hop opponents but neglected to mention Hatton was out of his best weight class (140). Double standards. I'll take Hopkins beating the lineal 175 champion in Pascal at age 47 than beating up Hatton anyday. No. I said Wright never did anything at 170 before fighting Hopkins and never did after fighting him either. I compared that to Marquez. JMM had never done anything at 144 before fighting Floyd, but after fighting Floyd he did just arguably beat the #1 WW in the world at the same weight. So I'd give Floyd more props for dominating Marquez at 144 than I do for Hopkins beating Wright at 170. Hatton wasn't at his best weight class but it was 100% his fault it didn't happen at 140, and at least Hatton, though he struggled, won a title at WW over Collazo, who was a Top 5 WW at the time Hatton fought him. Hopkins beating Oscar and Floyd beating Oscar are about equal. Oscar was coming off a bad outing against Sturm and the fight ended in a controversial fake loooking way, but he was a couple years younger. Oscar was coming off a nice KO win prior to fighting Floyd and was the #3 ranked SWW still. So those are close to equal really. Trinidad is better than Floyd's Corrales win, though going in Corrales was still a huge win for Floyd. Than I'd say the Castillo and Tarver wins are about even. Castillo was the #1 LW coming off good wins and the best LW of his era, with wins over Johnston, Bazan, Casamayor, Lazcano, Corrales, and J. Diaz. Tarver was the best LHW in the world and Hopkins went up in weight, and he does have wins over Jones, Johnson, and Woods, but I think Castillo has the better wins than Tarver overall. Than I'd take beating Hatton and Cotto over beating Pavlik and Pascal. Pavlik only ever beat Taylor, and Pascal's only wins are over Dawson and Diaconu. Hatton has beaten Tszyu, Collazo, Urango, Lazcano, and Malignaggi. Cotto has beaten Torres, Malignaggi, Judah, Mosley, Clottey, and Foreman. Both are better wins than Pavlik and Pascal, though those are still two good wins for Hopkins. Then that leaves Hopkins with Mercado, Jackson, Allen, Holmes, Joppy, and Eastman. And Floyd is left with Genaro, Manfredy, G. Vargas, C. Hernandez, Chavez, Corley, Gatti, Judah, Baldomir, Mosley, and Ortiz. That clearly and favors Floyd, and that's not even really close. Floyd just has a deeper resume, and pretty much even in terms of big wins, but Hopkisn having the biggest win.