Golovkin sodomises him.
It's a shame communism stopped the Eastern Europeans from sodomising the likes of Duran, Hearns, SRL and Hagler.
It's no coincidence that since the fall of the Soviet Union they have been laying the pipe in boxing.
You're talking about a different era the fabulous four would have destroyed any russian fighter at anytime, it's not like russians have a history as the most dominant fighters but blacks and hispanics do, it dont matter if the iron curtain was down fighters like hagler, leonard, duran, and hearns would have had them preferring to remain behind that iron curtain, you can believe that, skills pay the bills and hagler, leonard, duran, and hearns were pefect combinations of both skill and toughness they had all the tools not just one or two hagler would have beaten the crap out of golovkin and then koed him, 4-6 rds tops, eaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaasy work, and keep that gay garbage off the boards.
way too early...Hagler by decision or KO for now.
Hagler would have beat him to death plain an simple anyway that hagler chose to beat him he could have beat him it would be the same outcome when golovkin gets more experienced, skills pay the bills and golovkin does not have haglers skillset or toughness, hagler was more than a boxer puncher in his prime, take a look at the fully obel II fight and you will see what happens when you make marvin mad and he brings the fight to you. Like I said hagler was the best MW in history period and one of the all time greats of boxing he never received his just due in spite of all his accomplishments and dominant performances. I think it can be simply chalked up to plain jealousy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxjhOfZUyjk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8uNVMC_oMU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbLFJuLhjrw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4fYLfTajko
Hagler would have beat him to death plain an simple anyway that hagler chose to beat he could have beat him it would be the same outcome when golovkin gets more experienced, skills pay the bills and golovkin does not have haglers skillset or toughness, hagler was more than a boxer puncher in his prime, take a look at the fully obel II fight and you will see what happens when you make marvin mad and he brings the fight to you. Like I said hagler was the best MW in history period and one of the all time greats of boxing he never received his just due in spite of all his accomplishments and dominant performances. I think it can be simply chalked up to plain jealousy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxjhOfZUyjk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8uNVMC_oMU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbLFJuLhjrw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4fYLfTajko
Golovkin sodomises him.
It's a shame communism stopped the Eastern Europeans from sodomising the likes of Duran, Hearns, SRL and Hagler.
It's no coincidence that since the fall of the Soviet Union they have been laying the pipe in boxing.
I would love to see this fight,, but a prime hagler would dismantle GGG and stop him late,,,
GGG's power isnt going to affect hagler, and hagler was a very skillful boxer, and would switch stances till he found the one that had the best success vs GGG,, then he would put it on GGG and leave him bloodied and stopped in the 11th IMO
Now you sound like a person who is paying attention to the intricate skillset of each fighter, and that is what true boxing fans do and when you do that you can only come to one conclusion, hagler brutalizing golovkin.
I would love to see this fight,, but a prime hagler would dismantle GGG and stop him late,,,
GGG's power isnt going to affect hagler, and hagler was a very skillful boxer, and would switch stances till he found the one that had the best success vs GGG,, then he would put it on GGG and leave him bloodied and stopped in the 11th IMO
Because it took Marvin so long to get to the title because of boxing politics by that time he was pretty much past his peak, so the hagler that beat hearns, mugabi, and leonard because he won that fight also they just gave it to leonard, that hagler was well past his prime and when he fought leonard he was just a shell of his former self, but he still won that fight in my opinion and gave leonard hell. Leonard by his own admission waited for hagler to decline before facing him because he felt he couldn't beat hagler in his prime, just notice how leonard praises hagler when calling his fights. Below are a few fights of hagler as close to his peak as I could find. And one more thing hagler never used his head but hamsho and antufermo were notorious for using their heads, hagler on occasion had to fight fire with fire, hamsho for instance was a notoriously rough, tough and dirty fighter and he could crack and had a chin like a fricking anvil.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxjhOfZUyjk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8uNVMC_oMU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HbLFJuLhjrw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4fYLfTajko
You took time to quote and post a response to it and believe that I'm hyping Marvin but you didn't read it, how stupid is that? The only hype job is Golovkin, Marvin Hagler was the truth aint no hype about him, that media star Golovkin is the only hype job, aint no probably would win to it a prime Hagler would have ran him out of the ring plain an simple.
Doesn't take too long to quote and post a short response. And I guess I didn't make it clear on my part, I was talking about the people who over-hype GGG, not Marvin. My mistake.
Hagler's stamina and chin were unreal. GGG's stamina is in question IMO.
With that said, nobody beats GGG so yea...
Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android
SOme things should just not be joked about.
That says it I am glad I responded anyway lest some clueless individuals believe that mess and run with it.