when you talk about pac or margarito, are they winning?

Winning isnt just for black fighters. I proved that earlier with my Golovkin example. But as far as Pacquiao and Margarito, tell me what have they done recently that would suggest their winning? Dont worry i'll wait Margarito is known for cheating, is retired and his last 2 fights resulted in ass whoopings, dont seem like a winner to me. Pacquiao is coming off a loss, and in his previous fight had a piss poor showing that everyone thinks he lost. Once again dont seem like winning to me. If the fighter isnt doing s**t worth a damn then why would you say their "winning"? Margarito is a handwrap cheat, retired with a f**ked up eye and Pacquiao is a Filipino, religious nut who cant even decide his own path in boxing. What's the "win" in that? Obviously it appears to me that nobody says Pac and Margarito are winning because honestly what are the things that they have done recently that would make someone say "Damn, dude is winning he's doing his thing"? Open your eyes fam, this s**t aint hard to figure out fam. I understand you got that dude Perro slurping you up but still this thread wasnt neccesary at all. Especially when the answer was so simple You want non-Black fighters that are winning? Golovkin Carl Froch (Beat the crap out of Bute and I want to nut on his wife's face) The Klitschko's Those are a few. This whole "winning" stigma isnt a Black thing f**kboy, it's a success thing. Even though you said you got the point of this thread, its more than obvious that you didn't. So I'll explain it to you again. A segment of fans say Floyd and Broner are "winning", simply because are talking about them, not because of what they have done. I'll repeat it again for your slow country bumpkin ass. They say Floyd and Broner are "winning" because people talk about them in this forum in regards to the **** Floyd and Broner do outside the ring, not inside of it. For example, Broner cuts his hair like Floyd, Broners winning because y'all can't stop talking about him. Hes winning because he has you talking about his hair. Hes the newest and biggest star in the making. Enjoy your ban . Everything was too hard for you to figure out.

Come save us Rev Jackson!

Lol you guys are talking about the typical... "U"AlL jUsT HaTin An KeEp'eM ReALeVaanT" Response? Can i use it on Kelly Pavlik? i always felt that his "Drunkscapades" were his simple way of achieving longevity, and of course, through those who really hate him. In cnclusion i say if those who speak of Pavlik with s sour tongue, are merely shouting his name louder, for the world to know the greatness that is Pavlik. Apparently, "winning" is for black fighters. But I don't really know, the question hasn't been answered.

I asked for examples of non black fighters being seeing as "winning" because they were talked about. Nobody has provided one because they simply don't exist, or I haven't seen them. Seeing as how all of the supporters of certain black fighters say they are winning because people are talking about them, well, you should be able to connect the dots. But I'm not sure as to how bright your bulb is, so I have to question whether or not you have the capacity to understand something so simple. Simple, you are, because you see this as a race baiting thread, when its not. Its based on what is presented here. Not my fault people don't see non black fighters as "winning" when people talk about them. But as soon as someone mentions Floyd or Broner, "oh, hes winning because you're talking about him". So why doesn't that apply to fighters like Pac and Margarito? He'll ignore this portion of your post.

I grasp what the convo is about. I just fail to grasp on why did this become a black thing? Like seriously, it makes no sense? Cause people dont use that term in regards to fighters of other etnicities? Hell I dont use that term at ALL, (that word been played out honestly) I understand what you saying, I just dont understand how this gets lumped as a Black thing. It seems like you just created a race baiting thread honestly. You would have me banned for not agreeing with your thread, but shouldnt you be banned for race baiting? #Justsayin I asked for examples of non black fighters being seeing as "winning" because they were talked about. Nobody has provided one because they simply don't exist, or I haven't seen them. Seeing as how all of the supporters of certain black fighters say they are winning because people are talking about them, well, you should be able to connect the dots. But I'm not sure as to how bright your bulb is, so I have to question whether or not you have the capacity to understand something so simple. Simple, you are, because you see this as a race baiting thread, when its not. Its based on what is presented here. Not my fault people don't see non black fighters as "winning" when people talk about them. But as soon as someone mentions Floyd or Broner, "oh, hes winning because you're talking about him". So why doesn't that apply to fighters like Pac and Margarito?

Lol you guys are talking about the typical... "U"AlL jUsT HaTin An KeEp'eM ReALeVaanT" Response? Can i use it on Kelly Pavlik? i always felt that his "Drunkscapades" were his simple way of achieving longevity, and of course, through those who really hate him. In cnclusion i say if those who speak of Pavlik with s sour tongue, are merely shouting his name louder, for the world to know the greatness that is Pavlik.

Adrien Broner - "I'm Mr. HBO! I'm the face of HBO! It's da bruuuush!" Chavez Jr. - ":rofl: jajaja Si tu lo dices...." HBO execs - "Shh, yeah just keep telling Broner he's the face of HBO, he does substantially less numbers in both gate and television but he's useful, he's a clown and people love to laugh at clowns, he's great entertainment for our viewers."

I can come at you any f**kin way I want to. Let's get that out the way right now. Techincally by your definition Gennady Golovkin is the epitome of "Winning" wouldnt you say? He just dominanted in his first US fight on HBO and everybody is on his bandwagon, sounds like winning to me. Its not my definition dip****. Up your comprehension game because its severely lacking. Go back to the first page, and start over. If you can grasp what this convo is about, we'll continue from there, if not, you'll be banned forever.

I hate the word winning now. I can't believe people have resorted to saying Broner and Floyd are "winning" when they act like losers. But its marketing genius!

I hate the word winning now. I can't believe people have resorted to saying Broner and Floyd are "winning" when they act like losers.

That's just retarded and the fact that you even entertained that stupid s**t just shows me that you also are a stupid muthaf**a. All publicity aint good publicity, just cause someone is being discussed dont mean they're "winning". Come on bruh be smarter than that. Again you little clown, show me where a non black fighter being discussed is viewed as "winning". You don't have to come at me cross or in any type of vulgar way, just post the thread. As it is, the only "stupid muthaf**a is the one who doesn't have a leg to stand on in this discussion. Unless of course you're going to show the thread where a non black fighter is said to be winning because people are talking about him. Go.

Well that doesn't stand for everyone. You have to be worth something in the sport to benefit haters talking about you. Margarito means nothing, and has 0% credibility. So yes..Pac maybe, but not Margarito. Margarito has no credibility based on what exactly? Moving forward, For all the years Margarito was talked about, according to the criteria set forth by this particular segment of fans, he was indeed winning.

Well that doesn't stand for everyone. You have to be worth something in the sport to benefit haters talking about you. Margarito means nothing, and has 0% credibility. So yes..Pac maybe, but not Margarito.

When Broner/Floyd hit women, go to prison, are involved in shootings etc they are geniuses! They're totally building their brands! Lmao, never stop, this is too amusing.

since im giving you attention you're "winning" now. So there you go. Looks like you TKO'd yourself. 1-0 undefeated.

Well this was ignored so I'll post it again: Do you ever see Pac and Margarito doing immature shyt to get attention?

I dont like stupidity. It's a dumbass thread with a dumbass premise. And as far as that dude's autistic children, eh oh well it's his fault he should've never brought it up. Not my problem GIFSoup Only now it's a dumb thread with a dumb premise huh? Only when it pertains to you? Al Sharpton where ya at!!

That's just retarded and the fact that you even entertained that stupid s**t just shows me that you also are a stupid muthaf**a. All publicity aint good publicity, just cause someone is being discussed dont mean they're "winning". Come on bruh be smarter than that. Weren't you that immature idiot making fun of autistic children in that other thread? Apparently you don't like it when someone makes a thread like this, but when the tables are turned?

This is something I've noticed too. When you make a small joke about their fighters, all of their fanboys come into the thread and say "U KEEP TALKIN ABOUT HIM, UR MAKIN HIM A STAR" when in reality we're just talking about boxing as we would any fighter. This goes especially for Floyd, I remember people saying "FLOYD IS A GENUIS, HIS NAME IS ALL OVER THE NEWS NOW, HIS NEXT FIGHT WILL SELL BIG" and this was for Floyd hitting the mother of his children...

Quote: Originally Posted by Milk Money Or is that phrase reserved for black fighters only? Had to ax because I never see people make this claim in pac or tony threads? well your getting some attention and haters , you must be winning according to your logic that is its actually the logic of a certain segment of posters, not mine. take comprehension 101 again. Posted from Boxingscene.com App for Android