Did marquez "beat" Pacquiao more Convincingly than Morales?

Marquez hasn't beat Pacquiao so it's a stupid question

marquez beat Manny more convincingly imo. and JMM won all three fights as well.

silly poll, its obviously erik morales. he actually won a single fight in the trilogy. marquez has never beaten manny and is fortunate to even have a draw in the trilogy.

Both were convincing but I would say Marquez beat Pacquiao more decisively in the 3rd fight than Morales did against Pacquiao in the 1st fight.

I thought the 3rd Marquez-Pac fight was a convincing win for Marquez. But the first Morales fight was certainly more clear, IMO. That win is what elevated Morales to sheer greatness.

i always thought Erik even took a round or two off during the pac encounter

pacquiao won the first and the 2nd, morales was more convincing than the 3rd exactly............

I personally thought Morales-Pacquiao 1 was a close but clear win for Morales whereas I thought all 3 Pacquiao-Marquez fights were toss ups.

I am a Pac fan and although it was a close contest against JuanMa, Marquez did not beat Pac, we can argue for all time but we wont have any conclusion as we could not agree with the results but versus Erik in the first fight, all pac fans, tards & haters all agree that Morales won... so this should not even be a question...

Morales beat him up, Marquez outboxed him. The former is more popular with the judges, but I think the third Marquez fight was the most convincing...

I think Castillo beat Floyd more convincingly than Morales beat Pac. Castillo won quite easy against Floyd. LOL, man you love Floyd. What does he have to do with this thread? And PS Morales beat Manny more convincingly. Sorry bro.

Funny all these floydiots discrediting everything about Pac. Sorry. It will never change the fact Floyd weight cheated Marquez, sucker punched Ortiz, he was in jail because he beat the mother of his children. Anyway, try harder some more. It might be those facts can be erased in history if you try harder enough.

Castillo didn't beat Floyd. You just think he did because you can't score a fight or keep it real. This dude never even seen the fight. He admitted he had not seen it, and was going with what his selective hearing heard :lol1:

Castillo didn't beat Floyd. You just think he did because you can't score a fight or keep it real. You should just say 'can't keep it real' he's harped on about the same crap before even seeing the fight. Has nothing to do with how he scores and everything to do with him being a troll or having an unhealthy hatred for Mayweather.

not really cause of the 3 kds in the first round...you'd be better to go with the third fight. even without 3 kds id stil have pac winning the first fight..i scored it 7-5 for pacquiao - of course with the 3 kds you end up with a lopsided 115-110 score, although the first fight was fairly even after the first round.

Dont discuss triangle theories with me please. Whats morales underestimating Raheem got to do with Floyd anyway? Floyd lost to Castillo, and Morales, the better mexican wouldnt lose to Castillo, so whats your point? Castillo didn't beat Floyd. You just think he did because you can't score a fight or keep it real.

No.............

Dont discuss triangle theories with me please. Whats morales underestimating Raheem got to do with Floyd anyway? Floyd lost to Castillo, and Morales, the better mexican wouldnt lose to Castillo, so whats your point? http://i45.tinypic.com/1zx46ep.jpg bwhahahahah.....Floyd lost to Morales?! bwhahahahah....I know your trying to make a point, but still failed......

Lol....sure he would :haha:...morales would never beat Floyd Morales got out boxed by Raheem!!! Completely shut out and you.re gonna say he would beat mayweather?:wtf: Dont discuss triangle theories with me please. Whats morales underestimating Raheem got to do with Floyd anyway? Floyd lost to Castillo, and Morales, the better mexican wouldnt lose to Castillo, so whats your point?

Nope can't find the thread but people were saying that because of the way Pacquiao's hair moved the judges thought the punches were more significant than they actually were. I don't remember it being a huge thing, but I definitely remember it being mentioned a few times.