Is Froch's resume better than Calzaghe? is Kell brook still special?Khan v Garcia

Froch has a better resume, Frank Warren fighters will always have a **** resume, he's too fat slimey and greedy to think of the fighters, Kell is still where he was, Jones would give most WW's a tough time, imagine Ortiz crumbling in the late rounds of that pressure

Froch has had a much better career than Joe Calzaghe. It proves that a loss, or two (or ten), isn't the end of the world. I have infinitely more respect for Thomas Hearns than I do for Sven Ottke. I only ever saw Garcia fight Theophane - and he got gifted a result. But I am not counting him out. I have Khan as favourite but who knows what will happen? As for the Kell Brook situation. It's just one fight. And he won it. Could be another Broner - Ponce De Leon situation. Or he might not be that good. I'll judge him later on in his career.

loaded question

I think Froch has a better resume that calzhaghe. And I also don't think Brook is too special.

have you read the article mate? I agree with you to be fair, Calzaghe fought guys when they were finished.

In regards to Froch-Calzaghe; Arguably, yes. It's arguable IMO. If Froch were to beat Kessler, then absolutely.