Dwyer is now selling his "betting picks"......LOL

Dwyer, the youtube boxing predictor, now sells his betting picks. That's crazy, doesn't he say all Klitschko fights are "toss ups"? He said Bradley will beat Pacquiao and after the fight he said Bradley indeed beat him. LOL Everybody who watches some of his vids knows that most of his picks are wrong. He says stuff like "Tarver and Hopkins can beat Wlad Klitschko". And this same guy Dwyer now sells his "great" betting picks. You don't believe it? Here is Proof: Go to www.dwyervip.com and see for yourself. You can buy 30 days betting picks from Dwyer for 75 dollars. But you know what? Im gonna buy the 90 days cause thats a lot cheaper with 150 dollars. LMAO this is from his site: The private VIP picks are not available to the general public on YouTube. These are private picks with restricted YouTube access, if any. These picks are only released to the general public after the events have taken place so the public can monitor our past picks and record. Well, Dwyer, I "monitored" your picks in the past and I gotta say most of your picks are nonsense.

Comments (20)

Isaac_Hunt

Charlie Zelenoff is also being talked about a lot, is he doing something right? He does retard really well.

13y ago

Light_Speed

Dwyer is a smart man. Just the simple fact that we are talking about him and he's always talked about on this board means he must be doing something right Charlie Zelenoff is also being talked about a lot, is he doing something right?

13y ago

Hougigo

Dwyer is a smart man. Just the simple fact that we are talking about him and he's always talked about on this board means he must be doing something right, and shows we care about his opinion, whether they are right or wrong. After all, there are thousands of people on youtube that offer their boxing opinions. If he sucks so bad, then why watch him and talk about him so much. He's not forcing anyone to listen to him 99/100 threads on here are bashing him calling his picks dumb. Actually, the only time I've seen a vid on here is him being criticized. I think out of everyone on youtube... him and the british chap have the most laughable picks

13y ago

r3robinson

Why hate? Let old dude try make a change.....

13y ago

Salardo

13y ago

Light_Speed

Dwyer is a smart guy, but like everyone else in this sport, his results on tough pick fights is 50/50, just like everyone else. He leans towards the more refined fighters generally. I never go by what he says. I agree with some picks, disagree with others. I do however always enjoy his POV, regardless if i agree with it. Wlad/Thompson was a tough pick? :lol1:

13y ago

Exocet

I don't need to pay to have a black person tell me the black fighters are all far superior in every way and guaranteed to win. I just come to NSB.

13y ago

Salardo

He does in every video of his that I have watched. true that. apart from that he is a Floyd lover. his favorite punchline is "Marquez beat Pacquiao 3 times"

13y ago

Salardo

Unless they are massive odds like Thompson was at 16/1. If you bet 10 on Thompson that would be 160 if he won, i'd cover that by Wlad by KO (it think it was 2/3) so i would bet 15 on that to cover the 10 i put on Thompson. If Thompson wins i win 160 -15 that i put on Wlad =145, If Wlad wins by KO i win back the 10 i put on Thompson. dude if you believe that you win 10 bucks if you bet 15 bucks on Wlad by KO, you must be delusional. If you bet 15 bucks on Wlad by KO, you get less than 1 buck if he really knocks him out. You are right about the Thompson odds though

13y ago

boliodogs

Honestly he tends to favour black fighters.He does in every video of his that I have watched.

13y ago

Jam_Jars

the thing is this: if you make a bet like that where you bet on 2 things, and you lose BOTH, you lose a lot of money. And the bottom line is this: it takes a long long time until you get that money back by betting. Cause even if you win by making two bets on one fight, you only make A LITTLE money. Cause usually you lose one of the bets and the other one is just to make sure you dont lose a lot or you at least win a little. But if you lose 2 bets on one fight, you are really f+cked cause in the long run its almost impossible to get that money back. and everybody who did some betting, knows Im telling the truth Unless they are massive odds like Thompson was at 16/1. If you bet 10 on Thompson that would be 160 if he won, i'd cover that by Wlad by KO (it think it was 2/3) so i would bet 15 on that to cover the 10 i put on Thompson. If Thompson wins i win 160 -15 that i put on Wlad =145, If Wlad wins by KO i win back the 10 i put on Thompson.

13y ago

Hougigo

the thing is this: if you make a bet like that where you bet on 2 things, and you lose BOTH, you lose a lot of money. And the bottom line is this: it takes a long long time until you get that money back by betting. Cause even if you win by making two bets on one fight, you only make A LITTLE money. Cause usually you lose one of the bets and the other one is just to make sure you dont lose a lot or you at least win a little. But if you lose 2 bets on one fight, you are really f+cked cause in the long run its almost impossible to get that money back. and everybody who did some betting, knows Im telling the truth What are you talking about? If a person is stupid and bet big on both then yea, they're screwed. Thompson is not a fighter that would warrant a large bet, that's just being hopeful and stupid. I wouldn't bet 100 or more on Tony, that's just dumb. I don't know what you're talking about.... do you even bet on fights?

13y ago

dan_cov

Wlad by KO would have been the most obvious cover bet, i don't know why he picked the over. I'm not sure but at a guess it was because the odds was rubbish on Wlad by K.O as it was expected and you'd of had to risk a lot of money for very little reward.

13y ago

dan_cov

Dwyer doesn't pick who he thinks is most likely to win, he picks what is best value for bets. He usually saddles it with a bet on the other guy by KO or decision so even if his "value" bet doesn't win you have covered your losses from the bet on the other guy. This right here! I don't see the big deal even professional gamblers who make a killing often get tempted by what they consider great odds. I've done it myself many times sometimes it comes through, others it don't. Its just advice hes offering, nobody is right 100% of the time, its boxing and you'd better expect the unexpected. If people are better than Dwyer (not saying they aren't) then they should have a bit of fun at least and join the predictorship challenge on here!

13y ago

Salardo

IMO, that's horrible for boxing. He tried to hedge it with betting for Thompson and the over... but both lost. Betting the underdog works every so often in boxing.... he should just stick to making UFC picks if he's going to be doing that. the thing is this: if you make a bet like that where you bet on 2 things, and you lose BOTH, you lose a lot of money. And the bottom line is this: it takes a long long time until you get that money back by betting. Cause even if you win by making two bets on one fight, you only make A LITTLE money. Cause usually you lose one of the bets and the other one is just to make sure you dont lose a lot or you at least win a little. But if you lose 2 bets on one fight, you are really f+cked cause in the long run its almost impossible to get that money back. and everybody who did some betting, knows Im telling the truth

13y ago

Jam_Jars

13y ago

deanrw

13y ago

Hougigo

Dwyer doesn't pick who he thinks is most likely to win, he picks what is best value for bets. He usually saddles it with a bet on the other guy by KO or decision so even if his "value" bet doesn't win you have covered your losses from the bet on the other guy. IMO, that's horrible for boxing. He tried to hedge it with betting for Thompson and the over... but both lost. Betting the underdog works every so often in boxing.... he should just stick to making UFC picks if he's going to be doing that.

13y ago

Jam_Jars

13y ago

Cardinal_Buck

He should be rolling in dough after betting Thompson and straddling with the over.

13y ago