I see people throwing names around out there, but half of them are not technical at all. Do we know what technical even means?? By the book??
Ward is technical. Hands up, proper lateral movement. Fights behind the jab, chin tucked.
B-Hop for the most part.
Marquez too. But sometimes in exchanges he raises his chin.
Mikey Garcia is pretty damn technical.
Lara is technical.
Floyd is technical, but not as much as the others. Shoulder rolling isn't technical, neither is the ropeadope. His superior athleticism takes credit for his dominance more than technique.
Soto has good technique.
It's really hard to name 10 technical fighters. But I will say this, the European style is far more technical than other parts of the world. I would actually start there. Hell Daren Barker showed great technique in his battle with Martinez.
malignaggis technical skills arent good at all, hes just fast and cleaver. donaire and dirrell are alright but nowhere near the best, their main tools are all physical too. we are talking pure technique here.
the fighters with the best technical skills are imo. (in no particular order).
mayweather, ward, hopkins, sturm, marquez, dawson, wlad, l.peterson, tarver, john, lara, rigo etc..
Was guna pick Sturm but in his last few fights has looked sluggish, no way id put Peterson on that list, Definetley missed Lara though so fair play, Dirrell got all the tools so I'll respectivly disagree there, I know what you mean about Mallianggi i was really struggling to name a tenth, I think Tarver is just plain akward.
Mayweather
Ward
Hopkins
Marquez
Klitschko
Pirog
Dawson
Dirrell
Donaire
Malinaggi
malignaggis technical skills arent good at all, hes just fast and cleaver. donaire and dirrell are alright but nowhere near the best, their main tools are all physical too. we are talking pure technique here.
the fighters with the best technical skills are imo. (in no particular order).
mayweather, ward, hopkins, sturm, marquez, dawson, wlad, l.peterson, tarver, john, lara, rigo etc..