Pac is in a no man's land

Exactly. Certain style matchups are more entertaining. That's just inevitable. Its because some lames kept bringing up Pac doesnt want to fight slick blacks. Now that we see slick blacks with Pacman who wants to see him with a slick fighter? If its on free tv sure, but people who buy PPV want action gives us some gungho Latino with huge balls and brave so we get our moneys worth. This running and patty cake **** is boring, they aren't even trying to win more like survive. At least Floyd can make you miss and pay, and be effective with his defense, Bradley thought he was Marquez and Mosley combined and the only thing that he did good was slip punches and that was it, his jab was ineffective and he couldn't land **** on a declined Pacman.

It wasn't entertaining. It was like watching paint dry. That's spoiling to me. Don't start the circle jerk party just yet, I'm a Money fan too. But the way Floyd avoids and hits is far more superior and entertaining than the way Borothy Bradley fights. Like I said his hits were not meaningful he was shoe shining. And giving him the win over a celebrated champion because of a technicality is not only shameful, its a disgrace. That's not spoiling, spoiling has it's own meaning in this sport and it's usually used when Hopkins, Molina and Casamayor fight. What Bradley did was box from the outside. If anything you should be more critical towards Pacquiao who didn't do a damn thing in the championship rounds.

I agree, make a fight with Marcos Maidana that will get the public their moneys worth. I'm tired of seeing guys run, air jab, and be tentative against Manny. It's like these brothas are fighting scary, Clottey covering up all night, Mosley running all night, and Bradley trying to copy Mosley, and also holding when Pacman would unless a combo. Put Pac in there with some aggressive fighters like a Maidana, Berto or Ortiz not some defensive patty cake guys. Exactly. Certain style matchups are more entertaining. That's just inevitable.

I wonder why :lol1: By the way, what Bradley did from rounds 9-12 isn't spoiling. Spoiling is excessively holing, fighting dirty, pretty much neutralizing your opponents offense through illegal means. It wasn't entertaining. It was like watching paint dry. That's spoiling to me. these mother ****ers dont even know what spoiling is. smh. i guess this is what boxings come to, sit in front of me and let me hit u, if u dont do that, ur spoiling. and it isnt fair. smh. pac fans are something else. Don't start the circle jerk party just yet, I'm a Money fan too. But the way Floyd avoids and hits is far more superior and entertaining than the way Borothy Bradley fights. Like I said his hits were not meaningful he was shoe shining. And giving him the win over a celebrated champion because of a technicality is not only shameful, its a disgrace.

I am a pacquiao fan and a fan of boxing, but fights with Bradley and Marquez as his next two fights is all wrong for him. Bradley will be even more tentative in the second fight than in the first one, "controlling the fight with his jab". Ie.. Running around the ring landing pitty patty cake ish and using his head movement to keep Pac from landing consecutively. It will be a stinker of a fight and big time. Marquez is also a bad choice for Pac's style. We've seen it three times before and I, for one, have lost interest in that fight. I want to see pac fight fellow sluggers like ortiz and berto, and maybe even a cotto rematch. There is no way he can look good against Bradley OR Marquez I agree, make a fight with Marcos Maidana that will get the public their moneys worth. I'm tired of seeing guys run, air jab, and be tentative against Manny. It's like these brothas are fighting scary, Clottey covering up all night, Mosley running all night, and Bradley trying to copy Mosley, and also holding when Pacman would unless a combo. Put Pac in there with some aggressive fighters like a Maidana, Berto or Ortiz not some defensive patty cake guys.

I wonder why :lol1: By the way, what Bradley did from rounds 9-12 isn't spoiling. Spoiling is excessively holing, fighting dirty, pretty much neutralizing your opponents offense through illegal means. these mother ****ers dont even know what spoiling is. smh. i guess this is what boxings come to, sit in front of me and let me hit u, if u dont do that, ur spoiling. and it isnt fair. smh. pac fans are something else.

While I don't think Bradley technically ran, he certainly wasn't in there to put hurt on his opponent. He was more in survival mode to my eyes. No because bradley will just fight a spoiling fight like the last half of the first fight. I've no interest in watching a whole fight like rounds 9-12 of the first fight. I wonder why :lol1: By the way, what Bradley did from rounds 9-12 isn't spoiling. Spoiling is excessively holing, fighting dirty, pretty much neutralizing your opponents offense through illegal means.

Its a stinking fight because the rule "You must bring the fight to the champ and the challenger must do more than enough to win against the champ ." Is no longer apply here against Pac. To beat Pacquaio now all you have to do is wait for him to punch first and run around the ring and you win. While I don't think Bradley technically ran, he certainly wasn't in there to put hurt on his opponent. He was more in survival mode to my eyes. I dont want the marquez 4.. but i want the rematch, let him take it.. it will do good for both of them, if bradley wins convincingly then good for him, the fans will now accept and validate his victory. If pac wins, then good for him too.. he has taken back what shouldve been his.. if its a KO then better, there is closure already.. No because bradley will just fight a spoiling fight like the last half of the first fight. I've no interest in watching a whole fight like rounds 9-12 of the first fight.

I dont want the marquez 4.. but i want the rematch, let him take it.. it will do good for both of them, if bradley wins convincingly then good for him, the fans will now accept and validate his victory. If pac wins, then good for him too.. he has taken back what shouldve been his.. if its a KO then better, there is closure already..

Its a stinking fight because the rule "You must bring the fight to the champ and the challenger must do more than enough to win against the champ ." Is no longer apply here against Pac. To beat Pacquaio now all you have to do is wait for him to punch first and run around the ring and you win. http://static.divbyzero.nl/facepalm/doublefacepalm.jpg

I am a pacquiao fan and a fan of boxing, but fights with Bradley and Marquez as his next two fights is all wrong for him. Bradley will be even more tentative in the second fight than in the first one, "controlling the fight with his jab". Ie.. Running around the ring landing pitty patty cake ish and using his head movement to keep Pac from landing consecutively. It will be a stinker of a fight and big time. Marquez is also a bad choice for Pac's style. We've seen it three times before and I, for one, have lost interest in that fight. I want to see pac fight fellow sluggers like ortiz and berto, and maybe even a cotto rematch. There is no way he can look good against Bradley OR Marquez Its a stinking fight because the rule "You must bring the fight to the champ and the challenger must do more than enough to win against the champ ." Is no longer apply here against Pac. To beat Pacquaio now all you have to do is wait for him to punch first and run around the ring and you win.