During the Lampley interview, Duane Ford said Pac clearly won the first 6 rounds...

This is all part of the war on christianity. For all you conspiracy theorists. Someone notify Bill O'riely

Why this troll alt not yet ip banned for life. stop crying about who should be banned. You sound like a baby:bottle::bottle::bottle:

guessing he meant he won the first 6 rounds as if it was a 6 round fight. 4-2 5-1. He won the first 6 rounds overall.

He also said it was a VERY close fight, yet he said Bradley gave Manny a boxing lesson a week ago. Send this guy to a retirement home ASAP. Boom! Nailed him.. Flip Flopper shouldn't be judging lol Especially old has beens. If boxers gets old and erodes their skills I think judges eyes erode to. This judge should retire lol.. Too old, reflex in his eyes waning down. Very evident in this fight. Damn flip flopper can't seem to make up his mind. Exposed.

If that was true Malignaggi wouldn't have won a damn fight in his career. Wow, looks like you owned me hehe! Great come back. Malignaggi is in the same breath as Pac aye.. Wow didn't know Malignaggi matters in boxing :haha: enjoy being in the dumbass minority hehe!

He also said it was a VERY close fight, yet he said Bradley gave Manny a boxing lesson a week ago. Send this guy to a retirement home ASAP. Why on earth didn't Jim point out obvious things though? Like when Ford said that of course the public poll will favor Manny heavily because he's so well known. Oh yeah? Didn't JMM win HBO's poll after their fight?

The judge Pacquiao riders are slating is the same judge that gave Pacquiao the decision over JMM in the second fight.

lol the whole world saw what a robbery this fight was.. Boxers, trainers, analysts all over the world had it for Pac. Even this site you are posting had it for Pac. It seems to me you are among the few who needs to get his eye checked lol They even say even a kid who doesn't know boxing can score this fight clearly for pac. This ain't rocket science man. Just need good eyes to see. I think you should change sport coz you don't get what boxing is about. I'll give you a hint. This is a hurt game. The one who gives more hurt per round wins it, that's not including hitting gloves, elbows, forearm and air.. Hope you learned something. Get your eyes checked and watch the replay or maybe you better change sport coz if you've been a fan of boxing for a long time and you still see Bradley winning.. You don't understand the hurt game my friend. ;) If that was true Malignaggi wouldn't have won a damn fight in his career.

LOL at everyone targeting this guy. Even the judge that gave it Pacquiao had it close. All 3 judges saw a close fight. lol the whole world saw what a robbery this fight was.. Boxers, trainers, analysts all over the world had it for Pac. Even this site you are posting had it for Pac. It seems to me you are among the few who needs to get his eye checked lol They even say even a kid who doesn't know boxing can score this fight clearly for pac. This ain't rocket science man. Just need good eyes to see. I think you should change sport coz you don't get what boxing is about. I'll give you a hint. This is a hurt game. The one who gives more hurt per round wins it, that's not including hitting gloves, elbows, forearm and air.. Hope you learned something. Get your eyes checked and watch the replay or maybe you better change sport coz if you've been a fan of boxing for a long time and you still see Bradley winning.. You don't understand the hurt game my friend. ;)

I do believe what he meant is that Pac won the first 6 rounds CLEARLY as in 4-2. But the problem I have is that he made a comment about the 4th round where he said Pac CLEARLY won, BUT the Pac he's used to watching would've finished Bradley...wtf? Why does that matter? So now his scoring is being influenced by how Pac's fighting style has changed? How a fighter usually fights affects how they score ring generalship.

LOL at everyone targeting this guy. Even the judge that gave it Pacquiao had it close. All 3 judges saw a close fight.

I do believe what he meant is that Pac won the first 6 rounds CLEARLY as in 4-2. But the problem I have is that he made a comment about the 4th round where he said Pac CLEARLY won, BUT the Pac he's used to watching would've finished Bradley...wtf? Why does that matter? So now his scoring is being influenced by how Pac's fighting style has changed? He is complaining that Pac ain't the same fighter as before that's why he gave some rounds to Bradley lol.. That's prejudice.:purity: He wasn't counting rounds based on who won. That really exposed him. He thinks pac ain't the same so he gives some rounds to Bradley. Wow just wow.. Ain't that how to score real fights. So now a days Pac is competing with himself not his opponent. If Pac ain't a dynamo OO! Pac is in trouble. This guy will give it to his opponents regardless if he wins the rounds.. Just how I feel about it..

Incorrect and misleading. He said he won the first half of the fight. And Ford's card had it 4-2 Pacquiao which is consistent with his statement. Even at 4-2 with Manny leading the 1st 6 rounds, that only means he gave 5 rounds to Bradley in the last 6 rounds... WTF??!!!

what's pretty obvious to me is he seems to have issues with a fighter's overwhelming popularity and would like to be considered as some sort of maverick who goes against the grain. this is the vibe i got.

I watched that inteview too and I am asking the same question.It should be 114-114 for a draw.But still a draw will not make sense because Pacquiao dominated Bradley most of the rounds.This interview should be an evidence for NSAC and WBO to consider in reversing the decision.They should call it a draw or no contest because of the judges error.At least one judge already admitted he scored it 1st to 6th rounds for Pacquiao.What changed his score on the actual score card , I don't know?

Duane ford is full of it, he dont know what he is saying or thinking. He just has to admit he has friend and relatives who wanted bradley to win, and he was under pressure to give the bro a helping hand and break. Pacs had his career is how Ford saw it. Ford has to admit he was reckless with his judging and got it wrong. When people commit crimes on the spur of the moment they do usually leave evidence.

lol, even his american idol reasoning was sh1t. in the american idols finals , it so happened that it was an amercain vs a filipino/mexican american that competed and the american won that many thought was sh1t too. he is definitely bitter about something.

so basically he's seeing it one way but scoring it another. his 'american idol' and 'bradley taught pac a boxing lesson' quotes lead me to believe that he wasn't happy pac made his old ass wait so he let his scorecard show his displeasure. lol, even his american idol comparison was sh1t too. in the american idols finals , it so happened that it was an amercain vs a filipino/mexican american that competed and the american won that many thought was sh1t too.

I do believe what he meant is that Pac won the first 6 rounds CLEARLY as in 4-2. But the problem I have is that he made a comment about the 4th round where he said Pac CLEARLY won, BUT the Pac he's used to watching would've finished Bradley...wtf? Why does that matter? So now his scoring is being influenced by how Pac's fighting style has changed? Yeah I noticed that too. That statement was odd to say the least. I don't think it influenced his judging but he really needs to practice what he's going to say before going on camera...

what's pretty obvious to me is he seems to have issues with a fighter's overwhelming popularity and would like to be considered as some sort of maverick who goes against the grain. I do believe what he meant is that Pac won the first 6 rounds CLEARLY as in 4-2. But the problem I have is that he made a comment about the 4th round where he said Pac CLEARLY won, BUT the Pac he's used to watching would've finished Bradley...wtf? Why does that matter? So now his scoring is being influenced by how Pac's fighting style has changed?