Some folks always discredit Floyd's victory over Hatton claiming that he fought a 140lber at 147, though he was undefeated. So given the circumstances, which performance do you think was better?
Hatton on 24/7 and on fight night was so driven and was like a man possessed. Mayweather broke him down in every way. Pacquiao clearly beat Bradley but looked uninspired...both fighters looked like garbage to be honest. Pac looked one dimensional and bored and Bradley looked wild.
Definately Hatton getting KO'd for his 0! The ref did his job in that fight... nobody likes to watch a dirty fight. People ***** when others pull that garbage unless it's against Floyd.I agree with the part about the ref doing his job and I think Floyd wins easily no matter who referees the fight. Floyd's performance was a bit better than Manny's but Floyd was still prime at 30 and Manny is slightly past prime at 33.
Hatton would of done much better had he been able to work on the inside Cortez needs to die. Though it would change the fact as floyd would of picked him off with right uppercut counters
Hatton did work on the inside. He just couldnt get no clean work in. Cortez saved Hatton from a worser beating.
Pacquiao v Bradley, did it without the help of the ref.
after all these years? really? you're still that hurt?
look man, it wouldn't of mattered if there was no ref, and the fight was in Wembley, Hatton woulda been humiliated and beaten down anywhere at anytime. Get over it bud...
obviously mayweather - hatton was a better performance, by a mile. what a stupid question lol
I'd go with Mayweather-Hatton. Even though Pac should have won the UD (117-111, 116-112 at the closest), he faded down the stretch. I mean, rounds 9 and 11 were really close, and Bradley took rounds 10 and 12. A good performance, a really good win (should have been), and he would get as much credit for that win as Floyd did for beating Hatton, but his performance was flawed by the latter rounds.
In Mayweather-Hatton, going into round 10, Floyd was up 8-1 or 7-2 at the closest. And he TKO'd Hatton and finished the fight in spectacular fashion.
Both good performances and equal quality wins, but Floyd closed the show much better than Manny did, because Floyd stopped Hatton and Manny faded which sort of let Bradley into the fight slightly and made it closer than it appeared to some.
I'll go with the guy who won by KO and not the one who is supposed to be the biggest puncher ever and couldn't hurt a guy with a broken foot and sprained ankle. One of the dumbest questions ever posted on this board, and that's saying a lot.
Hatton would of done much better had he been able to work on the inside Cortez needs to die. Though it would change the fact as floyd would of picked him off with right uppercut counters
lol hahaha the ref or judge could of been Simon Cowell.
I would have preferred Simon Cowell to Joe Cortez, hell Paula Abdul would have done a better job
but i think 147 hatton was much stronger then 140 hatton. IMO.
Nah, he never really looked comfortable at the weight. He only really moved up to target Mayweather and when it came to negotiations he requested the fight at 140 and Mayweather wouldn't even agree to a catchweight.