For all Marquez fans I think Tyson tweeted it best

i had jmm vs pac 8-4 for jmm n pac vs bradley 8-4 for pacman, i call them robbery, if i see a fighter win by 4 or more rounds n doesnt get the decision then i call it a robbery, some of my friends say bradley only won the first 3 rounds n thats it, i saw bradley win 1,10,11,12 maybe some scored the first 3 n last 3 thats 6-6 a draw, pacman is the clear better fighter n he will get it clear in the rematch

Not trolling. I have no dog in this fight. I scored it a draw. Pacquiao missed a lot of punches, particularly in those flurries. I have no problem with 115-113 or 116-112 scores in favor of Pacquiao, but anything more is just bias. Pacquiao has no one to blame but himself. He should have gotten Bradley out of there when he had him hurt and should NOT have taken rounds off. I had Bradley winning rounds 1 & 2 and 9-12. Not looking to argue, I'll just point out that Bradley's lack of power (possibly exaggerated by injury) didn't serve him well. He wasn't snapping Manny's head back like Marquez was, hence not grabbing the attention of onlookers, but he landed plenty and fought a damn good fight. I didn't think Tim deserved the nod. At best a draw. I will watch and score the fight again when some of the hysteria dies down. A huge 83% of people here disagree with you. But that is your opinion and I have respect for it.

Pac beat jmm either 8-4 or 9-3 I thought pac bradley was close, only because pac took his foot off the gas at the end though. i scored it 6-6 the first time, and 7-5 for pac the 2nd time.

So Tyson is right because he is a Boxing Legend? That is his opinion, that does not make him "RIGHT" I think JMM fans have every right to NOT HAVE ANY SYMPATHY FOR PACQUIAO AND HIS FANS! And JMM has every right to come out and say "NOW MANNY KNOWS HOW IT FEELS" Where was the uproar and the Boycott Suggestions and the "Petition To Over Turn The Decision" for Campillo and Abril? going further back, where was the uproar for Lennox Lewis vs Evander Holyfield when Lennox clearly won and they called it a draw...boxing fans can't pick and choose certain standards for certain fighters and not give a damn because their fighter is not the one getting screwed lol look what end up happening, it happens to your Favorite Fighter and now all of a sudden YOU CARE! But then again most of the people crying or not BOXING FANS, they are just a "FAN OF A BOXER" because he is the same nationality as they are Tyson is a boxing legend and therefore, his comments are very CREDIBLE.

Marquez fight was also a robbery. Don't get it twisted. No way that **** was a robbery. If you think Marquez won then fine you would have a pretty good argument but there was so many close rounds that you can't call it a robbery. Anything from a 116-112 Marquez to 115-113 Pacquiao I have no problem with. This fight any scorecard that doesn't have Pacquiao winning at least 8 rounds is full of crap.

Mike is right!

Nobody has a problem with close decisions other than butt-hurt stans of the loser... A robbery is a robbery

Not trolling. I have no dog in this fight. I scored it a draw. Pacquiao missed a lot of punches, particularly in those flurries. I have no problem with 115-113 or 116-112 scores in favor of Pacquiao, but anything more is just bias. Pacquiao has no one to blame but himself. He should have gotten Bradley out of there when he had him hurt and should NOT have taken rounds off. I had Bradley winning rounds 1 & 2 and 9-12. Not looking to argue, I'll just point out that Bradley's lack of power (possibly exaggerated by injury) didn't serve him well. He wasn't snapping Manny's head back like Marquez was, hence not grabbing the attention of onlookers, but he landed plenty and fought a damn good fight. I didn't think Tim deserved the nod. At best a draw. I will watch and score the fight again when some of the hysteria dies down.

I was watching the fight & was viewing it as a pac fan just so i could score it correctly. I kept expecting him to dominate rounds after round 6 but it never came, it was a case of bradley figuring him out....or pacman going easy. The rematch will tell the true story.

pac-jmm 3 is in the same league as floyd-castillo 1

Marquez beat Pacquiao 9 rounds to 3. Pacquiao beat Bradley 7 rounds to 5.

The ultra Pac fans wont see it for obvious reasons, but Marquez beat Pac clearer in the third fight than Pac beat Bradley. JMM won 9 rounds in that fight and he wasn't doing nothing for 2 minutes and then trying to win rounds in the last minute. He was winning rounds from start to finish. Given a chance 3 times and blew it 3 times. That's the real story. By that logic, Pac was given a chance to beat a younger fighter and someone not coming off a loss and he blew it. If it's only the judges decision that's relevant, of course.

He's right. However, that in no way changes the fact that Marquez beat Pac. Twice.

So Tyson is right because he is a Boxing Legend? That is his opinion, that does not make him "RIGHT" I think JMM fans have every right to NOT HAVE ANY SYMPATHY FOR PACQUIAO AND HIS FANS! And JMM has every right to come out and say "NOW MANNY KNOWS HOW IT FEELS" Where was the uproar and the Boycott Suggestions and the "Petition To Over Turn The Decision" for Campillo and Abril? going further back, where was the uproar for Lennox Lewis vs Evander Holyfield when Lennox clearly won and they called it a draw...boxing fans can't pick and choose certain standards for certain fighters and not give a damn because their fighter is not the one getting screwed lol look what end up happening, it happens to your Favorite Fighter and now all of a sudden YOU CARE! But then again most of the people crying or not BOXING FANS, they are just a "FAN OF A BOXER" because he is the same nationality as they are

Tyson knows nothing about the sport. This is not American Idol, this is boxing. :boxing:

No it wasn't, not even close. JMM vs Pac was close and competitive, this was a fukin joke. I had JMM winning too but at least it was competitive. It wasnt close Marquez clearly won 8 rounds of the fight! if u going on effective punches, u cant even score pac more than 4 rounds if u bring in other factors like ring general ship or defence it even looks worse for Pacquaio

The Marquez fight was more of a Robbery as there was less close rounds Marquez easily won 8 rounds very clearly, with Pac man he was winning rounds just about and only by fighting in the last minute in some rounds pac always take the first minute or so off then he turns it up the last 2 minutes or so. and during those rounds where pac took a breather, bradley wasnt pressing the action nor was he doing anything to capitalized on it did he?? even the commentator was saying bradley should take advantages of this while pac is not attacking.

yea like sr will say he thought pac demolished bradley??? LOL!!! i was shocked enough to even hear sr pick pac as the winner. WHy? Floyd sr has forgotten more about the sport than most will ever know. He seen this **** dozens of times. He is a boxing lifer and knows the filthiness first hand.

Shut up Floyd Sr was right he said he thought Marquez Beat the Pacman better than the Pacman beat Bradley! yea like sr will say he thought pac demolished bradley??? LOL!!! i was shocked enough to even hear sr pick pac as the winner.

There is a reason why their is a difference between the reaction between the 2 fights between media/fans/etc.. It is obvious that the 2 fights are not the same league. The other is not considered a robbery. The Marquez fight was more of a Robbery as there was less close rounds Marquez easily won 8 rounds very clearly, with Pac man he was winning rounds just about and only by fighting in the last minute in some rounds