"He" meaning Pac.
http://www.boxingscene.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8456983&postcount=129
Look at the date. Like I said for awhile now. But, whatever.
Anyways, when the issue first came aboard was I aware how rampant PED use was in the sport? No. So was I willing to give fighters like Floyd, Pac, Ward the benefit of the doubt? Sure.
But, I always asked posters like IMDAZED and eaner0919 in PM's about how serious issue this was. So when they told me. I did my own research and reading about this subject.
So I started giving Floyd props for bringing this to light in the mainstream media. But, I have been giving him props for awhile now. Where big Floyd fans like IronDan, guys like Ray always respected me cuz' of that.
Now i don't give Floyd the benefit of the doubt nor Pac nor Ward. I'm very suspicious on all 3 of them and everyone else for that matter.
And, been so for awhile. So this whole, thing about me changing my stance since Peterson was caught is completely wrong. Not true whatsoever.
That's all, I'm out.
The only thing you agreed with there was wanting Pac to take the test with a 14 day cut off date......
Please insert $0.25. Please try again.
Hey Guys,
Remember this: "If Floyd was a man, he should fight Pacquiao on steroids. Steroids doesn't make you a better fighter".
Now, Team Khan is , like, "Did you see all that pressure that Peterson put on Amir? It wasn't a fair fight since both guys were not natural"
Hey Guys,
Remember this: "If Floyd was a man, he should fight Pacquiao eroids. Steroids doesn't make you a better fighter".
Now, Team Khan is , like, "Did you see all that pressure that Peterson put on Amir? It wasn't a fair fight since both guys were not natural"
That's some Mitt Romney stuff.
Mitt Romney is to the Auto Industry, as J Ro is to OSDT.......
His timing is "Impetuous", his convenience "Impregnable". He wants to eat Pac's unborn kids.
So you were against it when Mayweather was asking Pac to take the tests. You were against it when Mayweather was asking other fighters to take the test. You were against it when NOBODY tested positive for anything, buuuuuuut now you've been "in favor for a while now" when a fighters tests positive for something.
The timing and convenience is marvelous........
That's some Mitt Romney stuff.
So you were against it when Mayweather was asking Pac to take the tests. You were against it when Mayweather was asking other fighters to take the test. You were against it when NOBODY tested positive for anything, buuuuuuut now you've been "in favor for a while now" when a fighters tests positive for something.
The timing and convenience is marvelous........
It's what he does.
HTwon, this due here is a Pac fan. Why do you think if a Pac fan would have known he would have had me on ignore for a while?
My fault man. It had more to do with your disturbing avi than anything else. I just removed the block.
I think I been in favor of drug testing for a while now.
So you were against it when Mayweather was asking Pac to take the tests. You were against it when Mayweather was asking other fighters to take the test. You were against it when NOBODY tested positive for anything, buuuuuuut now you've been "in favor for a while now" when a fighters tests positive for something.
The timing and convenience is marvelous........
It was a bet right before Pac-Mosley. And, I said thatso can you explain sh*thing on! Ayweather for wanting Pac would fight a fighter like Cotto again before fighting a prime fighter like Bradley.
Then he fights JMM's, and now Cotto was his first option. Before Bradley was. Now I didn't know that Cotto deal was running out with TR. And, that he would take his ball and leave. I was banking on that Cotto would still be a top rank fighter. So I lost the bet since he is fighting Bradley. But, Cotto was his first option at 147.
So can you explain sh*tting on Mayweather for asking for testing, saying that it was baseless, and a way out of fighting "a fighter who can really beat him", to now d*ck riding fighters on twitter, and giving Mayweather props?
It was a bet right before Pac-Mosley. And, I said that Pac would fight a fighter like Cotto again before fighting a prime fighter like Bradley.
Then he fights JMM's, and now Cotto was his first option. Before Bradley was. Now I didn't know that Cotto deal was running out with TR. And, that he would take his ball and leave. I was banking on that Cotto would still be a top rank fighter. So I lost the bet since he is fighting Bradley. But, Cotto was his first option at 147.
OO right.
Mustve been someone else that did that bet and lost.
That's what I thought. I just assumed JRO was banned but he "claims" he wasn't. He's a pain, a lot of the time.
He wasnt banned.
He lost his account on a bet lol.
I haven't seen that name for a minute. Did he retire from BS or something?
Yea where is JRO, He is a cool poster... A nice pacquiao fans who knows his boxing, havent seen him on here for a while too..