dude seriously african americans are the last ones to talk about molina's clinch tatics if anything he probably learned that from AA boxers
Not my opinion, because all boxers clinch. But African Americans are the worst according to this guy.
Thoughts????
It's one thing to clinch a few times when you think you could be in trouble not not every 5-10 seconds when action starts. Clinching is a good tactic in boxing but when used in the way Hopkins uses it then its another story. Molina's clinching was so annoying because he kept doing it back to back to back.
tbh i dont think its a race thing
but more of how the trainer of that culture/country trains there fighter
e.g if a mexican fighter was trained in the U.S he will be more of a boxer than a fighter, vice versa.
but that's just my opinion
You know its more about what is going through TS mind. Like seriously, what brought about this theory? What is his train of thought that lead up to this thread.
Just insane.
yea. hes an alt of an idiot who continuously gets banned.
http://www.spaceg.com/multimedia/collection/fukung.net%20favorites/banned%20by%20Rome's%20Commodus.gif
ITT: TS makes a race baiting thread, posters cry racism and circle jerk each other
Oh you silly Mexican, go eat your delicious carne asada tacos elsewhere. This is a serious thread.
Nope because race was relevant in the matter Hypocrite Black Boxing fans cried about Molina's clinching when in the previous fight they had no promblem with Devon's clinching against Maidana
Terrible comparison.
Muhammed Ali, who many will say is the greatest heavyweight of all time, clinched. Sugar Ray Robinson, who many say is the greatest fighter ever, clinched. All the guys you would put on your all time great list clinched. Why? Because that is a major part of the sweet science. There are many guys, and too many to name, that were all action fighters and didn't clinch. But, I guarantee you they had short lived careers. Plus, they are not considered great fighters. There is a huge difference between a crowd pleasing action fighter and a great fighter. Boxing is the sweet science. If you are going to master your craft, then you have to learn how to properly clinch. It is a defensive skill. Boring or not, it is necesary.
that's different i'm not the one crying about racism
Because you can't admit bringing up race in a negative way was wrong. And then you continued about how black fans are bias in favor of black fighters.
Man, just stop. We know how roll and how you do things. Have a good one, joaquin.
You say all of this while supporting a guy who said racist things about Asians and said things like ''white fighters couldn't make it in boxing so they went and created the UFC''
:wave:
Yeah, and you support Bernard Hopkins supposedly........
I don't care what a fighter does or says out of the ring, why should I??? I care about how they perform. Floyd comes off as racially bias for sure, I still ilke his ability in the ring, not his personality. You come off as racially bias on a boxing forum.....way different.
And the funny thing is you don't have the backbone to admit on a boxing forum that you brought up race in a negative way for absolutely no reason.....
i didn't say ALL AA fighters clinch i said they do it more often compared to other race's and nationality's
Based on what? Your in-depth research? :lol1:
i didn't say ALL AA fighters clinch i said they do it more often compared to other race's and nationality's
You brought race up in a conversation that had nothing to do with race.
Clinching or holding is looked at as a bad thing for boxing, most of the time, so yes saying Black fighters clinch more is stupid and a bit racist.
Saying something like most asians fight in lower weight classes isn't the same at all, that's not a negative comment. If someone said something like Black people commit more crimes than other races, yes it'd be racist because it's a negative comment.
i have no issue with people saying black boxers clinch the most. clinching is not always a bad thing. look at mosley-margarito.
You may have no problem with it, but if you can't provide any evidence for that statement then it's inherently biased.