Im sorry but Seth Mitchel is still to raw to fight klitchkos..

Ya he's not ready at all needs to work on his punchs he has a good right hand but notting else

Either Klitschko would ruin Mitchell's career right now he ain't ready for them yet

I think if for once they actually give a rising fighter some decent challenges before he fights Wlad, then he could have a chance in maybe 2-3 years. People saying a year is enough time, well thats about 3 fights and I think this guy needs at least 4 maybe even 6 fights to be ready for a fighter. His body Punches would only give Wlad a problem if he could get inside vs Wlad, and lets be honest at the moment he does not have the ring IQ to get inside vs Wlad. If there serious about this guy, then let him fight a couple more C+ fighters, then move onto Tony Thompson, who Wlad will beat in july, Thompson would prob take this fight due to money and it would present Seth with the oppurtunity to try and get inside vs a tall guy. If he beats Thompson then move onto an arreola or an adamek, then fight a couple of other C+ guys before fighting a Povetkin/Chisora/Fury. If he beats all these guys I've named, that would set him up in 3 years to fight a 38 year old Wlad, and I think being built up like this would give him a decent chance, if he just takes say 2 more fights then fights Wlad I think he will get destroyed.

Hes way too green I think. I think maybe in a year, maybe two he can put it all together and give them some type of competition.

Definitely too early to talk the brothers. Quite frankly by the time he's ready Vitali will probably be retired. But Mitchel does have 1 dimension that heavyweight boxing as a whole is lacking. That's body punching. With some fine tuning & maybe a Joe Frazier peakaboo addition, he'll give Wlad hell Malone.

he's not going to beat wladimir but he'll make 3 million fighting him and they might even put the fight in america if the money is right after letting mitchell become a name in the division wladimir would stop mitchell in six brutal rounds maybe less.

You are very correct pauly. I agree 100%.