Who are you more sympathetic to?

I know Campillo got the raw deal vs Cloud. And Lara beat the Punisher decisively. But Lara has been given a gift himself for the fight with Molina. Campillo has now been robbed twice. But being as how high of a profile fight Pacman-Marquez 3 was, it takes the cake. Not the British telecast because they were on point. But hbo's bias was so sickening. Marquez was boxing beautifully they called it running. He was winning they said people are confusing not being beaten badly with winning. It was horrible.

Roy Jones Jr vs Tarver 1

lara might not amount to a hill of beans when this is all over marquez is one of the greatest fighters of all time Marquez has made money and is at the end of his career. Lara's career is completely stalled because of that robbery.

Surprised nobody mentioned the Hagler-Leonard fight since people seem to be totally divided on that fight. What about Taylor - Chavez? The decision to let him go, or not. Out of the list though I do go with Lara. Williams has been impossible to get a decision over it's insane. Remember that judge with martinez-williams? Speaking of Martinez...he's turned out for the better, but the Cintron decision..s...were cringe worthy.

I agree with you that Oscar beat Tito (and I was a Tito fan at the time). However, I don't feel bad for him because this was the only time Oscar ended up on the losing end of a controversial fight, while he ended up on the winning end of several controversial decisions, including Pernell Whitaker, Ike Quartey and Felix Sturm. Mosley II?

Lara by far. There's no interpretation, no arguing, nothing, Lara beat the hell out of Paul Williams. That would have been a win that could launch Lara into the upper level of the division, and set up the next step of his career, and he got screwed. Look at what has happened to him since. lara might not amount to a hill of beans when this is all over marquez is one of the greatest fighters of all time

Lara by far. There's no interpretation, no arguing, nothing, Lara beat the hell out of Paul Williams. That would have been a win that could launch Lara into the upper level of the division, and set up the next step of his career, and he got screwed. Look at what has happened to him since. This. I feel worst for Lara because it was by far the worst decision. The other fights were at least competitive.

Oscar-Tito was a joke. DLH won that fight very clearly and yet it's scored for Tito while the boxing press makes up the story that reads like this: "Oh, Oscar was winning the fight but his corner people gave him bad advice by telling him to box smart and so he gave away the last two rounds and so that's how he lost" -_- I didn't compare that too Marquez-Pac 3, I said that debacle took place a decade ago, as opposed to JMM-MP happened recently. I agree with you that Oscar beat Tito (and I was a Tito fan at the time). However, I don't feel bad for him because this was the only time Oscar ended up on the losing end of a controversial fight, while he ended up on the winning end of several controversial decisions, including Pernell Whitaker, Ike Quartey and Felix Sturm.

Lara would be in the same situation win or lose--an avoided fighter without a belt.

erislandy lara. i feel sorry for JMM too but robbed or not, he's getting paid well.

Lara by far. There's no interpretation, no arguing, nothing, Lara beat the hell out of Paul Williams. That would have been a win that could launch Lara into the upper level of the division, and set up the next step of his career, and he got screwed. Look at what has happened to him since. This. I feel sorry for Marquez as well but he gets to have a fourth fight with Pac and make a ton more money. People will look back when he is retired and not really care about the result as they will know it was a close fight. Lara on the other hand will get ducked and overlooked and might not make it as a top level fighter for a few years or at all now.

Marquez. Dude won the second fight in my eyes, and while the third fight was much closer, I believe he desereved the W again.

off the options listed I the poll, has to be Lara he beat the shit out of Williams not even slightly arguable for Williams to have won that decision was sickening

Blake Dreisbach, BleacherReport.com: 116-112 Marquez Gabriel Montoya, MaxBoxing.com: 116-112 Marquez Ron Borges, The Sweet Science/Boston Herald/Ring Magazine: 117-112 Marquez Tim Smith, New York Daily News: 116-112 Marquez Lem Satterfield, Ring Magazine: 117-111 Marquez Michael Marley, The Examiner: 115-113 Marquez Mike Coppinger, ******.com: 115-113 Marquez Al Bernstein: 115-113 Marquez Wayne McCullough: 115-113 Marquez Ryan Maquinana, BoxingScene.com: 116-113 Marquez Matt Hamilton, EsNews.com: 116-115 Marquez Ed Graney, Las Vegas Review-Journal: 115-113 Marquez Bob Sheridan: 115-114 Marquez John Katsilometes, Las Vegas Sun: 115-114 Marquez Bart Barry, 15Rounds.com: 117-113 Marquez Bill Dwyer, Los Angeles Times: 115-113 Marquez Pedro Fernandez, RingTalk.com: 116-113 Marquez Chris Williams, ************.com: 117-111 Marquez Eric Raskin, TheSweetScience.com: 116-112 Marquez Lyle Fitzsimmons, The Sports Network: 116-112 Marquez Steve Bunce, BBC: 117-111 Marquez Matt Lynch, BoxingToday: 116-112 Marquez Chuck Giampa, Retired Boxing Judge: 116-112 Marquez Glyn Leach, Boxing Monthly: 115-113 Marquez Briggs Seekins, BleacherReport.com: 115-113 Marquez Oly Goldstein, BadLeftHook.com: 116-112 Marquez Johnny Benz, DogHouseBoxing.com: 118-111 Marquez Lance Pugmire, Los Angeles Times: 115-113 Marquez George Willis, New York Post: 115-113 Marquez Rich Thomas, ProBoxing-Fans.com: 116-112 Marquez Raj Parmar, 3MoreRounds.com: 115-113 Marquez Norm Frauenheim, 15Rounds.com: 115-113 Marquez Martin Rogers, Yahoo! Sports: 115-113 Marquez James Slater, ********Boxing.com: 116-112 Marquez Nick Tylwalk, BoxingWatchers.com: 115-113 Marquez Bob Velin, USAToday: 115-113 Marquez Chris Manix, Sports Illustrated: 116-112 Marquez Igor Guryashkin, ESPN: Marquez by one round Brent Brookhouse, SB Nation: 115-113 Marquez Will Cooling, FOX Sports/InsideFights: 118-110 Marquez Andrew Fruman, The Boxing Bulletin: 116-112 Marquez Ben Thompson, FightHype.com: 115-113 Marquez Scott Mallon, Ring Magazine/TheSweetScience.com/TheFist: 117-111 Marquez Dan Ambrose, ************.com: 116-112 Marquez Kevin Mitchell, The Guardian: 117-114 Marquez Paul Magno, The Boxing Tribune: 115-113 Marquez Jerry Izenberg, Newark Star-Ledger: 115-114 Marquez Robert Morales, Los Angeles Daily News: 116-112 Marquez Scott Christ, Bad Left Hook: 115-113 Marquez Fox Doucette, The Boxing Tribune: 115-113 Marquez Henry Ramirez, Boxing Trainer: 116-113 Marquez Thomas Hauser, SecondsOut.com: 116-113 Marquez Gerardo Granados, ************.com: 116-112 Marquez Robert Guerrero: 116-112 Marquez Steve Kim, MaxBoxing.com: 115-113 Marquez Graham Shaw, SportingLife.com: 116-113 Marquez 55 scored it for Marquez if stating boxing Rec, like stop did. And 51 to Pacquiao. :gives: Thanks for posting this. According to "Stop" though, all these guys are either latino or bitter boxers that Pacquiao destroyed lol. Oh and yeah, what is this I'm reading about Tito not getting a gift decision against De La Hoya??? Everyone knows Oscar outclassed Tito in that match. Sure he back peddled in the last two rounds but that was only after making Tito look desperate trying to be effective. Hell, most puerto ricans watching the fight that night knew Oscar was giving him a boxing lesson. All my friends acted like they won the lotto when the score was read. They thought Oscar was going to win right up to the announcement. Even Tito couldn't believe it. Anyone saying Oscar didn't win most of the rounds, frustrated Tito making him look desperate and landed the cleaner more effective punches is either puerto rican or an oscar hater, point blank. I'll also say this.. If they feel Tito beat Oscar then they'd better feel like Margarito beat Cotto in the rematch because it's basically the same $h!t that happened.

LMAOOO owned. My homey Stop making people who dont know about boxing look bad. :lol1: :lol1: :lol1: Blake Dreisbach, BleacherReport.com: 116-112 Marquez Gabriel Montoya, MaxBoxing.com: 116-112 Marquez Ron Borges, The Sweet Science/Boston Herald/Ring Magazine: 117-112 Marquez Tim Smith, New York Daily News: 116-112 Marquez Lem Satterfield, Ring Magazine: 117-111 Marquez Michael Marley, The Examiner: 115-113 Marquez Mike Coppinger, ******.com: 115-113 Marquez Al Bernstein: 115-113 Marquez Wayne McCullough: 115-113 Marquez Ryan Maquinana, BoxingScene.com: 116-113 Marquez Matt Hamilton, EsNews.com: 116-115 Marquez Ed Graney, Las Vegas Review-Journal: 115-113 Marquez Bob Sheridan: 115-114 Marquez John Katsilometes, Las Vegas Sun: 115-114 Marquez Bart Barry, 15Rounds.com: 117-113 Marquez Bill Dwyer, Los Angeles Times: 115-113 Marquez Pedro Fernandez, RingTalk.com: 116-113 Marquez Chris Williams, ************.com: 117-111 Marquez Eric Raskin, TheSweetScience.com: 116-112 Marquez Lyle Fitzsimmons, The Sports Network: 116-112 Marquez Steve Bunce, BBC: 117-111 Marquez Matt Lynch, BoxingToday: 116-112 Marquez Chuck Giampa, Retired Boxing Judge: 116-112 Marquez Glyn Leach, Boxing Monthly: 115-113 Marquez Briggs Seekins, BleacherReport.com: 115-113 Marquez Oly Goldstein, BadLeftHook.com: 116-112 Marquez Johnny Benz, DogHouseBoxing.com: 118-111 Marquez Lance Pugmire, Los Angeles Times: 115-113 Marquez George Willis, New York Post: 115-113 Marquez Rich Thomas, ProBoxing-Fans.com: 116-112 Marquez Raj Parmar, 3MoreRounds.com: 115-113 Marquez Norm Frauenheim, 15Rounds.com: 115-113 Marquez Martin Rogers, Yahoo! Sports: 115-113 Marquez James Slater, ********Boxing.com: 116-112 Marquez Nick Tylwalk, BoxingWatchers.com: 115-113 Marquez Bob Velin, USAToday: 115-113 Marquez Chris Manix, Sports Illustrated: 116-112 Marquez Igor Guryashkin, ESPN: Marquez by one round Brent Brookhouse, SB Nation: 115-113 Marquez Will Cooling, FOX Sports/InsideFights: 118-110 Marquez Andrew Fruman, The Boxing Bulletin: 116-112 Marquez Ben Thompson, FightHype.com: 115-113 Marquez Scott Mallon, Ring Magazine/TheSweetScience.com/TheFist: 117-111 Marquez Dan Ambrose, ************.com: 116-112 Marquez Kevin Mitchell, The Guardian: 117-114 Marquez Paul Magno, The Boxing Tribune: 115-113 Marquez Jerry Izenberg, Newark Star-Ledger: 115-114 Marquez Robert Morales, Los Angeles Daily News: 116-112 Marquez Scott Christ, Bad Left Hook: 115-113 Marquez Fox Doucette, The Boxing Tribune: 115-113 Marquez Henry Ramirez, Boxing Trainer: 116-113 Marquez Thomas Hauser, SecondsOut.com: 116-113 Marquez Gerardo Granados, ************.com: 116-112 Marquez Robert Guerrero: 116-112 Marquez Steve Kim, MaxBoxing.com: 115-113 Marquez Graham Shaw, SportingLife.com: 116-113 Marquez 55 scored it for Marquez if stating boxing Rec, like stop did. And 51 to Pacquiao. :gives:

Easily Marquez, he's ready to retire & he finally got the clear W, but was robbed & even all but told so by arum himself.

no need for Sympathy really THE PEOPLE KNOW JMM WON! I would rather be the "PEOPLES CHAMPIONS" then to walk around with some Bull***** Belt Sadly it will be a new generation of Boxing fans who will be ignorant to the history of boxing and they will just look up Boxrec and it will say JMM lost to Pacquiao 3 Times, that part SUCKS, but currently most know he won those fights...ESPECIALLY THE LAST ONE, the other two...fine you can argue that is your a BIAS PACQUAIO FAN, I will give you that, but this last fight, you only look like a Bias idiot trying to defend that BS

Its true lots of fighters get robbed but Marquez wasn't just robbed of a W but was robbed of being the first (no offense to Morales) legit Mexican four weight world champion.

Marquez vs Pacquiao 3

I feel bad for Vargas big time in the Tito fight, he fought his ass off and Tito cheated. Dirty prik. Thanks for the laugh... Don't get me wrong I always liked Vargas "no fear" style, but Tito was just the better boxer at that time... I always say Vargas fought Tito at the wrong time he could of had a better career if he wouldn't of fought Tito at that time