Boxing people; I got a question

broner would beat him to big to talented

Granted, Barrera clearly won the fight btwn him and Prince but it aint like he just straight BLEW naseem out.

u guys remember this :D

Those that think they know the Prince because they saw the Barrera fight, "don't know shiiit about baaaxing". Broner is good to watch, but lets be honest, he's largely untested and against the best of Hamed, it's not even close. Hamed by brutal KO

Khan beat Barrera, Barrera beat Morales, Morales beat Pacquiao, Pacquiao beat Oscar, Oscar beat Camacho, Camacho beat Leonard, Leonard beat Hagler. Khan KO's Hagler, proven with science. Still think triangle theories work?:fing02: Broner beat Litzau who beat Juarez who beat Raheem who beat Morales who beat Pacquiao who beat Barrera who beat Naseem... Broner by KO, proven with science Glad to see I'm inspiring others.

It would take hours just to get the fight started the way those two love to showboat. lol yup, they'll probably have a dance-off first.

Hamed is the best showman I've seen in the ring.

Great video...horrible music...:lol1: Can't argue with that.

Hamed KOs Boner

I dont know why ppl place so much faith in this guy. I find him to be a quick puncher with limited boxing skills. He is fairly two-dimensional. But more importantly, Adrien Broner is largely untested. I hope to see him match up against Gamboa some time soon. Someone who is just as fast. Hits just as hard. And with a superior ring I.Q.

It would take hours just to get the fight started the way those two love to showboat.

Broner could not live with this

Broner just cant be caught; and honestly I dont see how he could go without being caught by Hamed. I dont know if he has the discipline to box Hamed smartly and stay cagey like Barrera did.

Khan beat Barrera, Barrera beat Morales, Morales beat Pacquiao, Pacquiao beat Oscar, Oscar beat Camacho, Camacho beat Leonard, Leonard beat Hagler. Khan KO's Hagler, proven with science. Still think triangle theories work?:fing02: You would think the fact that I said proven with science would lead on that i was trolling. Also what is a triangle theory? is that like transitive relation?

Broner beat Litzau who beat Juarez who beat Raheem who beat Morales who beat Pacquiao who beat Barrera who beat Naseem... Broner by KO, proven with science Khan beat Barrera, Barrera beat Morales, Morales beat Pacquiao, Pacquiao beat Oscar, Oscar beat Camacho, Camacho beat Leonard, Leonard beat Hagler. Khan KO's Hagler, proven with science. Still think triangle theories work?:fing02:

Would Adrien Broner be too fast and sharp at 126lbs. for Naseem Hamed? Or would Hamed be too strong for Broner? it is wayyyy to early to make fantasy matchups between Broner and Hall of fame boxers. (at least Hamed should be in the HOF). Broner isnt tested yet, hasnt fought anybody of significance. And probably got a gift decision against a limited fighter like Ponce De Leon. Hamed won about 15 consecutive world title fights. Broner hasnt done sh it compared to Hamed right now.

Hamed KO's everyone head to head at 126. http://www.profibox.hu/image_upload//big_2007_10_31_8_52_barrera-hamed.jpg

Broner beat Litzau who beat Juarez who beat Raheem who beat Morales who beat Pacquiao who beat Barrera who beat Naseem... Broner by KO, proven with science seems legit to me...

At 126, Hamed would not only be too strong but will be the far bigger puncher, the quicker reflexes, faster and more skills. His unorthodox style, punches from crazy angles take Broner apart. Prime Hamed at 126lbs stops Broner in 9.

If De Leon got to him then you can be sure Hamed would get to him too, and we don't know if Broner has a good enough chin to take a monster shot from Hamed.