Here are the stats:
Mike Tyson
took 193 shots over 8 rounds:
http://www.corbisimages.com/images/UT0115657.jpg?size=67&uid=8c84dd14-ce34-4c05-a4a5-f0cb01f2b33c
Vitali Klitschko
took 102 shots over 6 rounds:
http://www.lennox-goerge.de/lewis/lewis_klitschko_03_500.jpg
Evander Holyfield
took 348 shots over 12 rounds:
http://cache4.asset-cache.net/xc/50555426.jpg?v=1&c=IWSAsset&k=2&d=E41C9FE5C4AA0A147AD33C0359540723D267252299FC657C8316AE40DDE33F36B01E70F2B3269972
It's a difficult one.
Of the three said fighters, Holyfield was outclassed for two fights but wasn't totally outmuscled, Vitali took some monstrous punches and never went down and Tyson went further than Klit but was a shadow of his former self.
I'd go with Holyfield because he met a primed Lewis.
How was he outclassed for two fights?
He lost the first fight but he certainly wasn't outclassed in the 2nd fight.
Holyfield arguably won the 2nd fight.
Wow Tyson took less than Vitali and Holyfiled? He must have some kind of floyd mayweather defense or something.
But i wonder how many punches Lennox took if he hit his opponents that much?
It's a difficult one.
Of the three said fighters, Holyfield was outclassed for two fights but wasn't totally outmuscled, Vitali took some monstrous punches and never went down and Tyson went further than Klit but was a shadow of his former self.
I'd go with Holyfield because he met a primed Lewis.
Draw between Vitali and Holyfield.
Also, why does Joeyzagz refuse to answer my question about the brothers' ATG heavyweight status? He's losing credibility.
Zeljko Mavrovic.
Out of the choices provided I'd go with Vitaly. Tyson went down and Holy wasn't hit as cleanly. Overall I agree with Marovic. That took MASSIVE shots for 12 rounds. Would have been interesting to see how his career would have unfolded had it continued.