Miguel Vazquez vs. Adrien Broner @135

Looks like a dead heat. Gotta say i didn't expect it to be this close. I thought people would get caught up in Broner-mania.

I just watched Broner's last fight and he would destroy Miguel. It would take about 4 rounds for him to adjust to the height. Vasquez is way to slow and predictable. Vasquez predictable?????? Just stop watching boxing if you believe what you just wrote. What makes him so great is the unpredictability and timing of his jab. Also while he doesn't have the fastest hand his feet are lightning quick and he has great reflexes. Broner would get soundly out boxed.

You sure you've seen Vazquez? I bet he humiliates Ponce. Who's slow and predictable vasquez doesnt have that many dimensions, hes a counter punching outboxer that likes to stay on the outside. i like him, but hes not the most exciting, skilled boxer/counterer in the world. he uses his height well tho, too bad he has no power.

I don't think so. I got Vazquez by UD. What about Hammerin' Hank... that would be a solid match at '35.

I just watched Broner's last fight and he would destroy Miguel. It would take about 4 rounds for him to adjust to the height. Vasquez is way to slow and predictable. You sure you've seen Vazquez? I bet he humiliates Ponce. Who's slow and predictable

I can almost guarantee that 99% of the people who voted on this poll...NEVER SEEN Vazquez fight and never heard of him until this thread lol :nonono: What makes you think that? Pretty sure most people saw him dominate Prescott on ESPN and dominate Zappavigna on the Cotto/Mayorga undercard

I can almost guarantee that 99% of the people who voted on this poll...NEVER SEEN Vazquez fight and never heard of him until this thread lol :nonono:

Vasquez is too skilled he would keep Broner on the outside and pick him apart. Vasquez wins by a wide decision. Broner is too small and too inexperienced to fight a guy like Vasquez.

fans always are searching for a new Bandwagon, everytime Broner beats a fighter his haters will find a new guy and say "He Can't Beat This Fighter..." this will continue to go ON AND ON for awhile, then you have some LOSERS who are ready to label Broner "A DUCKER" when he hasn't ducked anyone, Eloy was calling him out and he fought him, other then Eloy and maybe Hank Lundy, nobody has really called Broner Out! In losing, Eloy Perez still impressed me. I didn't know much about him to be honest. Even though he got knocked out in the 4th round, I saw his handspeed and boxing ability, he's actually not a bad fighter. It's just that Broner was just too good. I can't believe any one that will try to take credit away from some one's opponent, just to bash the guy who won. Perez is actually an okay fighter and I was impressed, Broner was too much though. But I can see why Eloy was undefeated coming in, he's not a big puncher but he can box, and he can beat guys his size IMO. On top of being too good, Broner was also big, that's a deadly combination right there.

Broner is big for 130 but Vazquez is big for 135. Vazquez's size and ability give him an edge over pretty much anyone at lighweight. He's bigger than Rios IMO, but he has a lankier frame. He is rangy and boxes well. It would probably be a boring fight, with Vazquez winning a UD. That what vazquez does and he's pretty good at it. He's only lost to Bradley and Canelo at higher weight. I have yet to see one fighter call out Vazquez since he picked up his strap. There is a reason for that.

Broner beats Vazquez.

fans always are searching for a new Bandwagon, everytime Broner beats a fighter his haters will find a new guy and say "He Can't Beat This Fighter..." this will continue to go ON AND ON for awhile, then you have some LOSERS who are ready to label Broner "A DUCKER" when he hasn't ducked anyone, Eloy was calling him out and he fought him, other then Eloy and maybe Hank Lundy, nobody has really called Broner Out!

good fight.... cant call it. at this point vazquez has the better resume, and can probably take broners power well since he was fighting at weights he shouldnt have been fighting at and didnt get ko-ed. both of there recent fights werent against great opponents either. but man besides this fight theyre a lot of good fights at 135 broner vs gamboa, linares, marquez, vazquez, lundy, guerrero. any of these would be great

http://www.boxnews.com.ua/photos/2506/Leonardo-Zappavigna-Miguel-Vazquez2.jpg VS http://www.boxingfutures.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/boxer_profile/Adrien%20Broner.jpg Who wins? Dude you should be a promoter! I think vasquez style is very boring but effective! I can see him frustrating broner with his style alot!

1. idc who koed khan since then, the guy doesnt have a good chin. thats a fact. prescott wasnt the first one to make him shaky at lighweight and the other guys who did werent punchers at all. 2. canelo might be naturally bigger, but that does not mean anything in terms of power. u can say the same thing about canelo being bigger than prescott as well, but canleo didnt hurt vasquez, prescott did. so ur argument is faulty. fighting bigger guys is not equal to fighting more powerful guys i dunno why ppl get these dumb ideas. He doesn't have a good chin because he got KO'ed once??? Ur 2nd point..... A gifted 130 lber hits harder then a guy who has shown some pop at a much higher weight.... Ok if that's what u want to believe.... Wilfredo Gomez 122 doesn't hit harder then Chavez at 130..... Because of the weight difference..... Doesn't matter how much power Gomez had at 122.... And that was only 8lbs..... 130-147 is a bigger gap can Broner have that same power when he moves up??? We don't know.... Canelo has shown that he can punch at different weights.... So ATM I give the power edge to Canelo and also Prescott.... There is nothing on Broners current resume to think otherwise

Vazquez is better than most people think he is. This would be a hard fight for Broner because Titere is slick, tall and has good ring IQ. If Broner could win a fight like this then I would give him credit. Right now is hard to give him a lot of credit when he's fighting some Argentinian unknown boxer and a green Eloy Perez.

Prescott has fought the better fighters while maintaining a similar KO% hmm and who has KO'ed Khan since Prescott since he is china chinned??? I bring up Canelo because he has more power then Broner regardless of age.... Naturally bigger guy or do u disagree??? 1. idc who koed khan since then, the guy doesnt have a good chin. thats a fact. prescott wasnt the first one to make him shaky at lighweight and the other guys who did werent punchers at all. 2. canelo might be naturally bigger, but that does not mean anything in terms of power. u can say the same thing about canelo being bigger than prescott as well, but canleo didnt hurt vasquez, prescott did. so ur argument is faulty. fighting bigger guys is not equal to fighting more powerful guys i dunno why ppl get these dumb ideas.

Broner is more likely to catch him Vasquez with a shot he does not see..Prescott and Alvarez are not that good tbh,Broner has a lot of potential..I don't think he would knock Vasquez out,but it can happen..Broner has very fast hands and good power.. Cool.... But if the KO doesn't come and he has to go 12 (AB only done once) who does that favor??? That's why I picked Vazquez Right now Broner has a punchers chance but I wouldn't favor him to take a decision from a guy who has been there before and has seen things Broner has yet to.... Down the road maybe it will change.... But ATM I favor MV

ive seen nothing that suggests prescott hits harder than broner. their ko percentages are very similar and while prescott has fought better fighters, he hasnt knocked out any good ones except china chinned khan. and stop bringing up canelo. it does nothing to help your argument. even now canelo isnt a one punch knockout artist and back then he was what? 16 or 17? seriously, theres no point. Prescott has fought the better fighters while maintaining a similar KO% hmm and who has KO'ed Khan since Prescott since he is china chinned??? I bring up Canelo because he has more power then Broner regardless of age.... Naturally bigger guy or do u disagree???

Prescott hurt him.... Ok.... U think Broner hits harder then Prescott??? Canelo at 147 (and who knows what he rehydrated to) hits harder then AB at 130..... Or do u disagree??? ive seen nothing that suggests prescott hits harder than broner. their ko percentages are very similar and while prescott has fought better fighters, he hasnt knocked out any good ones except china chinned khan. and stop bringing up canelo. it does nothing to help your argument. even now canelo isnt a one punch knockout artist and back then he was what? 16 or 17? seriously, theres no point.