If Pacquiao beats Bradley, is it fair to say he is the greatest fighter of all time?

Pac will never be the goat, he'd need to ko andre ward and wladimir klitchko to make that possible

lol Pacquiao is Goat after Bradley win

http://www.jappleng.com/jSpot/Sekai/gallery/general-images-a38/troll-line-m2645.jpg

ur lame. and even lamer now that I know that u post with 2 accounts of yours to make it look like u got support for idiotic statements. SMH.......You are just butt hurt......... nobody but you and a few fanboys think that Manny is the greatest of all time. You should be banned for this *****ty thread

"Yawn..." http://www.gagful.com/uploads/2011_11/1321657281_Street_toilet_gag.jpg Pacquiao fighting Bradley says it all. The man faces everybody. E V E R Y B O D Y. Bradley is very skilled, one of the best p4p in the world, he is in his prime and he is very dangerous (not just because of his headbutts). Some say Ali is the GOAT. Ali needed gift decisions against Jimmy Young and Doug Jones, furthermore he probably lost twice against Ken Norton and struggled 3 times with Joe Frazier. I had Pacquiao losing the 3rd fight against Marquez, but I had Pacquiao winning the first 2 fights. Maybe Pacquiao's last fight showed he is in decline, but maybe he still has something left to beat a prime Timothy Bradley, one of the finest fighters of this generation. If Pacquiao could do it once again, prove everybody wrong, he might be the greatest boxer that ever lived.

Pacquiao fighting Bradley says it all. The man faces everybody. E V E R Y B O D Y. Bradley is very skilled, one of the best p4p in the world, he is in his prime and he is very dangerous (not just because of his headbutts). Some say Ali is the GOAT. Ali needed gift decisions against Jimmy Young and Doug Jones, furthermore he probably lost twice against Ken Norton and struggled 3 times with Joe Frazier. I had Pacquiao losing the 3rd fight against Marquez, but I had Pacquiao winning the first 2 fights. Maybe Pacquiao's last fight showed he is in decline, but maybe he still has something left to beat a prime Timothy Bradley, one of the finest fighters of this generation. If Pacquiao could do it once again, prove everybody wrong, he might be the greatest boxer that ever lived. Your New to BOXING hu?

Wow your calling me a troll when your the dumb a$$ who started this thread. GTFOH ur lame. and even lamer now that I know that u post with 2 accounts of yours to make it look like u got support for idiotic statements.

you have to be the biggest troll on this forum. obviously a total retard and probably on gaayweathers nuts thats why u cant see the truth. none of those guys were shot when they fought Pacquiao, NONE OF THEM. ur retarded and u troll here without realising how stupid all of your comments are Wow your calling me a troll when your the dumb a$$ who started this thread. GTFOH

No, the answer is no.

Delahoya, Morales and Mosley were pretty far past it. There was a reason Pac ducked Mosley in 2008. de la Hoya lost a split decision against Mayweather a little earlier. Morales had beaten Pacquiao himself one year before the rematch and Mosley just had beaten Margarito about 2 fights earlier. "Far past it" is something else. Maybe not 100 per cent prime, but definitely not shot.

Ok so take away these wins off of Pacs record because all these guys got excuses on why they lost........... Cotto(weight drained) Margarito(weight drained) Hatton (shot) Delahoya (shot, weight drained, old) Mosley (shot, old) Morales (shot) Clottey (paid off) If your gonna make excuses for pac...then i'm gonna make excuses for these fighters. you have to be the biggest troll on this forum. obviously a total retard and probably on gaayweathers nuts thats why u cant see the truth. none of those guys were shot when they fought Pacquiao, NONE OF THEM. ur retarded and u troll here without realising how stupid all of your comments are

I wont say that Pacquiao will never be because im no fortune teller no psychic but beating Bradley does not give him the GOAT title. Would a dominant win or stoppage of Bradley get him closer?? Yah of course but their is much more left to accomplish before we start setting the throne for the man. Come on now... GOAT with a win over Bradley?? Hell of a win but doesnt validate this claim at all.

Ok so take away these wins off of Pacs record because all these guys got excuses on why they lost........... Cotto(weight drained) Margarito(weight drained) Hatton (shot) Delahoya (shot, weight drained, old) Mosley (shot, old) Morales (shot) Clottey (paid off) If your gonna make excuses for pac...then i'm gonna make excuses for these fighters. sure go right ahead......

If Many beats Mayweather.. that's a whole different story. Bradley however.. nah

no you can count the loss, but all of you flomos and pac haters like to nit pick pac's wins and discredit some of them...so why can't we have the same kind of treatment as well for those first two early losses? he got ko'ed on his 12th pro fight when he was 17 (in other words he was young and inexperienced at the pro level) and second loss he was killing himself to make weight... Ok so take away these wins off of Pacs record because all these guys got excuses on why they lost........... Cotto(weight drained) Margarito(weight drained) Hatton (shot) Delahoya (shot, weight drained, old) Mosley (shot, old) Morales (shot) Clottey (paid off) If your gonna make excuses for pac...then i'm gonna make excuses for these fighters.

your talking More about weight and scales than you are the fights. Every fighter has an excuse on why he lost. So now because a fighter had a good excuse.........we shoud not count the lost? no you can count the loss, but all of you flomos and pac haters like to nit pick pac's wins and discredit some of them...so why can't we have the same kind of treatment as well for those first two early losses? he got ko'ed on his 12th pro fight when he was 17 (in other words he was young and inexperienced at the pro level) and second loss he was killing himself to make weight...

Pacquiao will never be the G.O.A.T NEVER! Hehe NEVVVAAAAAAAAAAAAARR!

Close this gay thread please.

Come on now Huey....calling him the G.O.A.T is just as stupid as calling him a fraud. Yes he lost the third fight against JMM but lets not forget what he has achieved in Boxing. He's definitely an All Time Great but there can be no argument whatsoever made for him to be called the G.O.A.T. Pacquiao will never be the G.O.A.T NEVER!

I'm sure Pactards will call him the GOAT, but real boxing fans aren't stupid and will call him out for the fraud that he is. Boxing fans are the most unforgiving. The crowd reaction after the JMM-Pac 3 verdict is the living proof of that. Come on now Huey....calling him the G.O.A.T is just as stupid as calling him a fraud. Yes he lost the third fight against JMM but lets not forget what he has achieved in Boxing. He's definitely an All Time Great but there can be no argument whatsoever made for him to be called the G.O.A.T.