Both of them are horrible cherrypicked fights. One is a horribly cherrypicked fight against his rival's leftovers, the other one is a horribly cherrypicked fight against a weight drained fighter.
All 3 fights are horrific: Pac-Cotto in 2009 at 145, Pac-Cotto II in 2012 at 147, and May-Cotto in 2012 at 154. All cherrypicks.
cotto has done more at ww than sww....pac beat the dogsh1t out of cotto already .....
But it was either Pacquiao fighting Cotto in June@147 or Mayweather fighting Cotto in May@154. So which is better?
But the fact is, it was either gonna be one of the 2, so which is better?
They're both as terrible as each other. Its still against the same guy, Miguel Cotto, who is finished as an elite fighter.