Dwyer said that Mosley would beat Pac too so I wouldnt take naything he says too seriously. Maybe he was thinking of prime Shane as I dont know how else he arrived at that conclusion.
In regards to this fight though I think he has a case. If I was to bet on the fight I'd put money on Bradley and I imagine the odds would be good. Pacs only real advantage I can see is punch power but Ive seen Tim hit with Massive shots but get up and take control so Im confident he has the experience to deal with any sticky patches. And thats if Pac lands flush. Marquez did a good job shutting Pac down offensivley and given Tims speed, ability to adjust & use of head I see it being a very long night for Manny. Not to mention Mannys decline in his last few fights where he just hasnt looked the same cruising in boring 12 rounders.
dwyer forgot more about boxing in the last year than most of the guys in this forum
he's a gambler
he has to take a take and run with it
he's not an analyist
you're not going to be objective,
or constantly right, when you are giving a take like the one dwyer is giving
most folks provide an analysis
that's really not what dwyer does. he makes a case for a certain take on a fight
and he's right
bradley will be able to back pacquiao up
i dont think he will win, but i think he will back him up and work the body
he's young, hungry, fast enough, has a solid enough chin
i think the judges would find another way to give it to pacquiao
there's too much at stake (the floyd fight) for tim bradley to get a fair shake
hell, marquez couldnt get a fair shake, and he's a first ballot HOFER and a bonafide ATG
Sadly, that's the case.
I personally still think that both Pac & Floyd are horrible matchups for Bradley and that Pac runs through him in 5 but thats just me
Pac should win pretty comfortably, but Bradley is a harder style matchup for Pac than he is for Floyd. Floyd would murk Bradley in a similar fashion to the way he did JMM.
I personally still think that both Pac & Floyd are horrible matchups for Bradley and that Pac runs through him in 5 but thats just me
I agree with Dwyer....Pac is going to be shocked in that ring.
I agree with Dwyer 100%
unless Arum pays Bradley off to take the "DIVE" for Pacquiao, I think Bradley presents some SERIOUS ISSUES for Pacquiao...his ability to be unpredictable with his punches and how he mix up his punches and his ability to fight inside and also his body punching, also excellent at ducking underneath and dodging punches and countering with quick punches, also has very good footwork and balance and his stamina is OUTSTANDING!
other then landing a lucky KO Punch (which can Happen because Bradley makes his mistakes and gets wild as well)...I Think Bradley beats Pacquiao with Counter Punches and Body Shots but would probably get robbed in the cards to save the Mayweather vs Pacquiao potential fight
all these stuff about "Bradley Doesn't Have The Style To Go 5 Round With Pacquiao" hahaha :nonono: that is being posted by people who don't know sh!t about Bradley and they are only focused on the fact that Bradley don't have great power, so they are assume just like they assumed against JMM a few months ago that Pacquiao would DESTROY JMM...also some Pacquiao fans still think he is unbeatable and is in serious denial about his last fight with JMM just because he was REWARD the win
I feel sorry for those that are expecting a easy fight for Pacquiao against Bradley...:nonono: your going to be so disappointed
Dwyer makes some of the most outlandish comments I have possibly ever heard.
The guy said Devon Alexander has a world class jab for crying out loud.
he acutally said that he didn't think alexander had a world class jab, my friend.
he took a long time getting there but he says something along the lines of "the supporters of alexander think he has an ATG type jab (he lists liston, holmes, ali, foreman, as guys with great jabs.)"
and then he says that he doesnt agree with them, and that maidana will be able to get through the jab without issue
he calls it a pawing jab.
heres the video
i think its at 4:30 or so.
this right here. bradley doesnt have the style to survive unless like u stated he pulls a mosley and back track. bradley's style is perfect for pac to pick his shots.
You are right, I see Pac catching him with sth big sooner or later.
This guys does nothing but hate on Pacquiao, it's pretty sad.
But I think Bradley could be able to beat him, but only in the audiences eyes like Marquez. So if we look at the most likely scenarios they all favor Pacquiao.
1. Fight probably ends up in decision, for Manny.
2. If the fight is close or it looks like Bradley edged it out, Pacquiao still get the nod.
3. In the event of a KO or TKO, you know it's gonna be Manny being the one getting the stoppage. No FUKKING way is Bradley stopping Manny.
So everything leads to a Pacquiao victory, unless Bradley schools Pacquiao 10-2 which is very unlikely. Can't see how Tim would win this fight.
Got a feeling he is working for the big gambling shops, and gives bad advice so they can clean up.
I was thinking the same thing, he can't be that stupid. It must be sth behind his "advisory". Seriously, his favoring of underdogs is very suspicious.
Did this dumbass said Pacquiao is like devon alexander? :nonono::nonono::nonono:
Yeah maybe he thinks Pacquiao going to back peddle all night, not want to engage or throw any punches with conviction, then say it burns it burns and want to quit.
I personally still think that both Pac & Floyd are horrible matchups for Bradley and that Pac runs through him in 5 but thats just me
Got a feeling he is working for the big gambling shops, and gives bad advice so they can clean up.
I don't want to take anything away from Bradley, he's a good fighter, but Pac will destroy this guy, it will def not go 12 rds unless Bradley goes in "Mosley running mode" after he will taste the power punches like he did never before.
you know nothing about gambling.dwyer makes money or breakes even,reguradless which fighter he picks to wins or lose.its called a straddle.you mat not agree with his points but atleast he makes a solid case for which fighter he thinks would win not like the many clowns on this site.
I would think i know a little about sportsbetting.
No he can't possible breakeven or make money regardless, because it is mathematically impossible. You can say that he hedge his risks but hes still most likely losing expected value by doing so.
Yes he makes a case, but it's horribly misinformed. Him saying Bradley is the favorite here (as he hints at not even mentioning the odds) is like saying microsoft should be valued at three times the price it's currently at on the stock market.
In the end both sports-betting and the stock market works the same. In order to beat it you need to apply info that hasn't already been accounted for, IE making better simulations than the bookie and other sharps. Or you have to shop the line and anticipate the movement.
If you think Dwyer has some special system to beat sports-betting with his straddles you are absolutely clueless. Maybe you should try to martingale the roulette tables while you're at it?
if pac isnt fighting floyd then bradley is the next best thing IMO.
He's undefeated, young, top 10 p4p, and most important of all he's BLACK.
greatest post in this thread. :lol1: