Why not Pacquiao vs. Bradley?????

And here, again, is the problem. Why must we excuse incompetence? Is it not clear to you, as a logical human being with intelligence that Rios LOST to Abril CLEARLY? Must we accept that he should have lost but really on paper he's undefeated because of clear as day incompetence? I don't understand. All you're doing is putting your fingers in your ears and accepting a technicality because you like the sound of it. Don't take it the wrong way but it's boarderline delusion you are dealing with. What I'm doing is respecting the sport,boxing is a very subjective sport..Everyone's opinion is valid,but only the outcome is truth bro..That's my logic on the sport of boxing..I gave you a bunch of fights that I felt were bad decision,but I know in reality that does not change the outcome of the fight.. Pac Bradley imo was a close win for Bradley..You have a clear Pac win,it's are opinions and that's all well and good..But the sports rules are that we leave the decision up to the judges..That's what I do,not just with this fight(Pac Bradley)but with every decision that's made in the sport..Yes I can have an opinion about the outcome of any and every fight..But that will not change the fact that the outcome of the fight is set in stone..

Rome-By-Ko sounding a bit like Check_hooks...

People are in denial over the Bradley loss and in shock over the Marquez KO. Pac can rematch both of them and make it right. Talk to Bob Arum......his promoter. Shouldn't you be somewhere giving Rios credit for the Abril win? Don't forget Cintron, he proved he's just as good as p4p Sergio.

People are in denial over the Bradley loss and in shock over the Marquez KO. Pac can rematch both of them and make it right. Talk to Bob Arum......his promoter.

Bradley's a pretty tough fight for Pacquiao to return from a KO in, particularly in April. I think I gave Bradley 3-4 rounds and I picked him to win a rematch before the Pac-Marquez KO. Interesting fight, but not what Pacquiao needs right now.

The fact is Rios is undefeated..There is no changing that.. And here, again, is the problem. Why must we excuse incompetence? Is it not clear to you, as a logical human being with intelligence that Rios LOST to Abril CLEARLY? Must we accept that he should have lost but really on paper he's undefeated because of clear as day incompetence? I don't understand. All you're doing is putting your fingers in your ears and accepting a technicality because you like the sound of it. Don't take it the wrong way but it's boarderline delusion you are dealing with.

I think you don't know the meaning of a the word fact..Bradley is undefeated dude..I know it burns ya azz to have to acknowledge this,but this is a fact..You believing Bradley did not deserve the decision is an opinion..That's reality.. Doesn't burn me. I was rooting for Bradley immensely to beat Pacquaio. Nothing I would have liked more than to see him win (Legitimately)

No thanks about joining your squad. I do my dirt about my lonely but back to the script. It's a win win for TR they get a PPV event an April. Bradley vs Pac 2 why the f**k not get it together TR. Arum has nothing to lose, he's all about that money anyways and he'd get the old scoop-scoop.

LoL @ Rome-By-Ko

Why should he acknowledge the(so-called)experts,while you ignore the judges who are paid to view that fight and nothing else..Not write or talk in between rds,just focus on the fight...Oh and btw those experts did not see a whitewash..Each saw a close fight.. The numbers imply whitewash, not close at all 1. More 11-1 scores that 7-5+draw+Bradley win combined 2. Average score reported: 117-111

I'll ignore you on this cause you refuse to acknowledge experts who saw it live had it a whitewash, with no hbo in their ear. I coulda sworn you've boosted Macklin on account of him beating Sturm, and that fight was far closer. Why should he acknowledge the(so-called)experts,while you ignore the judges who are paid to view that fight and nothing else..Not write or talk in between rds,just focus on the fight...Oh and btw those experts did not see a whitewash..Each saw a close fight..

I missed your two second limit but make it happen man, call Arum up and get it done. I'm all for it, Pac needs to right that wrong anyways. Don't be mad cause Tim stays winning, that's what winners do, you are more than welcome to join the squad, we don't discriminate. :fing02: No thanks about joining your squad. I do my dirt about my lonely but back to the script. It's a win win for TR they get a PPV event an April. Bradley vs Pac 2 why the f**k not get it together TR.

Until Pac rematches Bradley and the judges say Pac is the winner, I've no problem recognizing Bradley's win and giving him props. It was a close fight and Pac didn't get the call. Marquez took it out of the judges hands completely. Some people are still not coming to grips over that KO. Do you also give props to Rios, PWill, Cloud for beating Abril, Lara, Campillo?

Until Pac rematches Bradley and the judges say Pac is the winner, I've no problem recognizing Bradley's win and giving him props. It was a close fight and Pac didn't get the call. Marquez took it out of the judges hands completely. Some people are still not coming to grips over that KO.

Still didn't watch the video did you? Like I said, I thought Pac won by a few rounds on what I saw. But what I saw was far from a "whitewash" That's cause you were watching a video edited to fit an agenda. Let me repeat this: More 11-1 press row scores than 7-5+draw+Bradley win combined

I'll ignore you on this cause you refuse to acknowledge experts who saw it live had it a whitewash, with no hbo in their ear. I coulda sworn you've boosted Macklin on account of him beating Sturm, and that fight was far closer. Still didn't watch the video did you? Like I said, I thought Pac won by a few rounds on what I saw. But what I saw was far from a "whitewash"

Why not have the rematch in April it can be a tune up fight for Pac. So in sept he can have the rematch with Marquez. In two-seconds I'LL get a response from Rome by KO and Mathed the dynamic due d**kriding Bradley nuts sweepstakes Lol. I missed your two second limit but make it happen man, call Arum up and get it done. I'm all for it, Pac needs to right that wrong anyways. Don't be mad cause Tim stays winning, that's what winners do, you are more than welcome to join the squad, we don't discriminate. :fing02:

I gave you a video showing PAc missing tons of punches and getting smacked in the face and HBO/Lederman giving tons of credit to Pac. That shizzle ain't fabricated man, that's what happened in the ring. I ain't trying to prove anything, that stuff has already been proved. But like i said, I already knew you didn't watch it..........I understand if you are scared. I'll ignore you on this cause you refuse to acknowledge experts who saw it live had it a whitewash, with no hbo in their ear. I coulda sworn you've boosted Macklin on account of him beating Sturm, and that fight was far closer.

I thought Peterson beat Ortiz..I thought Kotelnik and Matt's beat Alexander..I felt Cloud lost to Campillo Martinez beat Cintron etc etc..But fact is none of what I felt came to past..That does not change how I feel about these fights..But it also does not change the outcome... Most people consider Campillo Cloud and Martinez Cintron straight robberies. Not so much for Peterson Ortiz, the consensus is not there. For Pac Bradley, it's very much there. A great majority had Pac winning widely

You're giving me a link trying to prove people's wide scores for Pac were influenced by hbo. I gave a link with 120+ scores from boxing experts that did not listen to hbo, who had it a blowout for Pac. What's so complicated? I gave you a video showing PAc missing tons of punches and getting smacked in the face and HBO/Lederman giving tons of credit to Pac. That shizzle ain't fabricated man, that's what happened in the ring. I ain't trying to prove anything, that stuff has already been proved. But like i said, I already knew you didn't watch it..........I understand if you are scared.