JCC should have fought Tito in 93

That would have been a good fight back than to.

Tito wouldn't have beat him worse than Oscar. Yes he would have.

great post you know what you talking about:You_Rock_ Every once in a while. ;)

Tito wouldn't have beat him worse than Oscar.

Timeline is off here. He shouldn't have fought Tito in 93. That's preposterous. Tito won his first title in June 93, a month after Chavez-Alli. Chavez was signed to fight Pea in September of that year. That was the biggest non-Heavyweight PPV of all time and THE fight in boxing. Part of the deal with the WBC was to make his mandatory versus Randall after Pea. There was no way in hell Tito-Chavez in 93 made a lick of sense, was mentioned by anyone, or even remotely considered. By late 94, maybe it could have happened but 95 was more realistic. By 95, Chavez wouldn't have stood a chance there. /end thread

Ts and 2nd porgt r the same person true story

Timeline is off here. He shouldn't have fought Tito in 93. That's preposterous. Tito won his first title in June 93, a month after Chavez-Alli. Chavez was signed to fight Pea in September of that year. That was the biggest non-Heavyweight PPV of all time and THE fight in boxing. Part of the deal with the WBC was to make his mandatory versus Randall after Pea. There was no way in hell Tito-Chavez in 93 made a lick of sense, was mentioned by anyone, or even remotely considered. By late 94, maybe it could have happened but 95 was more realistic. By 95, Chavez wouldn't have stood a chance there. great post you know what you talking about:You_Rock_

Timeline is off here. He shouldn't have fought Tito in 93. That's preposterous. Tito won his first title in June 93, a month after Chavez-Alli. Chavez was signed to fight Pea in September of that year. That was the biggest non-Heavyweight PPV of all time and THE fight in boxing. Part of the deal with the WBC was to make his mandatory versus Randall after Pea. There was no way in hell Tito-Chavez in 93 made a lick of sense, was mentioned by anyone, or even remotely considered. By late 94, maybe it could have happened but 95 was more realistic. By 95, Chavez wouldn't have stood a chance there.

chavez never duckd him u lying sack of shi* Yes he did, the fight was offered to chavez and chavez wanted no part of it, they both shared the same promoter, I count that as a duck

I'm happy he didn't fight Trinidad. Oscar busted him up good, but I feel Trinidad would have damaged him permanently.

Tito woldve humiliated him worse than Oscar did.

It was actually in '94, Don King's ambitious plan was for Chavez to defend his titles against Randall, Giovanni Parisi, Meldrick Taylor, Juan Martin Coggi and challenging Felix Trinidad later that year, King had Whitaker not on Chavez' list and Tito was an option to go for a fourth world title at 147. I was thinking of favoring an up-and-coming Trinidad to beat an aging Chavez, Tito might put the nail in the coffin for JCC had they fought around '94-'95.

I didn't know they offered Chavez the fight, it made sense since the were both promoted by Don King and with a win over Chavez, Tito would have became really big at that time. Do you know in what year did Chavez ducked him ?? I dont count that as a duck, but it was in 93 right before chavez fought Oscar, and in 94 after he fought Oscar

Tito would had fukked him up, they presented Chavez the Tito fight and he turn it down!! I didn't know they offered Chavez the fight, it made sense since the were both promoted by Don King and with a win over Chavez, Tito would have became really big at that time. Do you know in what year did Chavez ducked him ??

Tito would had fukked him up, they presented Chavez the Tito fight and he turn it down!!

Any thoughts on this matchup ??