Would Floyd Mayweather have any chance against Ray Robinson?

only crazy idiots who never watched full matches picked Ray on all sites he looks like.Louis really stiff basic and slow would be destroyed floyd fought people way more advanced then him as early as his first 2 matches​

Ive been saying this for years. Most of the guys back then who were "pro" fighters had day jobs. Floyd beat more full time fighters than any of those guys. these records of 100, 200 fights over factory union workers who pull 10, 12 hour shifts then box a bit on the side is a joke. Macriano for his over hyped 49-0 record only fought like 7 or so guys who actually boxed for a living. its a fuking joke. Floyd fought for 18 years in a completely different era, fighting actual pro boxers and they want to compare the past era to this one. Flick trolling me saying stupid stuff as if what I said isn't on video these people here are crazy

Not really. Floyd is, in my opinion, the most skilled boxer in history but that doesn't mean he wins every fantasy match up. Size and measurables also matter. Add SRR had great hand speed. It's not going to be easy for Floyd to win. Also, notice I said SRR would possibly beat Floyd just by being more active. Meaning, judges perception would favor SRR not SRR being better than Floyd outright. The same reason I think SRL would trouble Floyd greatly is why I think SRR would. They are bigger guys with comparable speed and footwork. Floyd can be more skilled but p4p exists for a reason. Bigger guys with just as much hand speed. Floyd would fight defensively and won't find it easy or convenient to counter them either. As they both had great boxing IQs as well. So, take that as you will but that's just the reality. SRR compares favorably to Floyd, whether ancient boxing or not. Punching is punching whether it is 2009 or 2109. Everything i said is fact on video for the real sugar on video my version you need glasses to see this one you obviously do cause nobody who seen the real version goes against what I said as if its a lie Your version same as the louis the crazy people on this site and others never existed I don't care about fiction versions so none of the crazy stuff you said matters to me since its fiction this version yea he beats floyd and others since he is on their level of advanced movement and skills

He might have meant he fought over 90% bums. SRR is history polished, no doubt was great but his resume is really poor, I actually think he wouldn't be anywhere near as big today, I tell you something just extend Ennis resume to 200 bouts with 90% being the same class he has been fighting and he would have 200 wins and at least 180 kos , now how would that look in history in the 1940s. Could Floyd beat him maybe, the biggest issue is Floyd is such a small WW when looking at history's greatest WWs, in all these Floyd vs great WWs, Floyd is really a LW-JWW.that was good enough to be top WWS, that size really goes against him in these debates. Bring boots enis down to the auto manufacturing plant and sign him up for 30 fights in the next 6 months, there you go instant "classic" boxer record.

Robinson is over hyped man, lots of the ancient fighters from the old days were stat padders. They all feasted on the bums of the months club. Mayweather easily outboxes Robinson. Ive been saying this for years. Most of the guys back then who were "pro" fighters had day jobs. Floyd beat more full time fighters than any of those guys. these records of 100, 200 fights over factory union workers who pull 10, 12 hour shifts then box a bit on the side is a joke. Macriano for his over hyped 49-0 record only fought like 7 or so guys who actually boxed for a living. its a fuking joke. Floyd fought for 18 years in a completely different era, fighting actual pro boxers and they want to compare the past era to this one.

at 147 with SRR actually weighing 147? Mayweather never loses to anyone who is actually the same or less weight than him fight night. SRR would need modern rules and be in his 160 pound form with modern weight cuts to beat mayweather. Mayweather is a throwback fighter slaying bigger men in the weight cut era.

Hopefully Floyd isn’t with Al Haymon in this hypothetical because if he were, Al would realize there is a greater chance than usual of Floyd losing so fight likely would never get made.

Srr fought in the 40s floyd was in 90s like thats a way more advanced era like you need to watch matches saying stupid stuff the 40s were trash compared they all look stiff and outdated srr activity as it was would get him koed cause he tiptoed alot and looked sloopy throwing punches inside the body The era often at times looked lost or hesitant this is the same era you crazy people say Louis would do good was from vs people in 70s-90s which he had the same outdated skills and movement these dudes look horrible compare to 70s-90s you would be able to see this if you had good vision or watched matches everything I say is fact on video Floyd fought people in amateurs who moved better on top of more advanced movement with skills Not really. Floyd is, in my opinion, the most skilled boxer in history but that doesn't mean he wins every fantasy match up. Size and measurables also matter. Add SRR had great hand speed. It's not going to be easy for Floyd to win. Also, notice I said SRR would possibly beat Floyd just by being more active. Meaning, judges perception would favor SRR not SRR being better than Floyd outright. The same reason I think SRL would trouble Floyd greatly is why I think SRR would. They are bigger guys with comparable speed and footwork. Floyd can be more skilled but p4p exists for a reason. Bigger guys with just as much hand speed. Floyd would fight defensively and won't find it easy or convenient to counter them either. As they both had great boxing IQs as well. So, take that as you will but that's just the reality. SRR compares favorably to Floyd, whether ancient boxing or not. Punching is punching whether it is 2009 or 2109.

He might have meant he fought over 90% bums. SRR is history polished, no doubt was great but his resume is really poor, I actually think he wouldn't be anywhere near as big today, I tell you something just extend Ennis resume to 200 bouts with 90% being the same class he has been fighting and he would have 200 wins and at least 180 kos , now how would that look in history in the 1940s. Could Floyd beat him maybe, the biggest issue is Floyd is such a small WW when looking at history's greatest WWs, in all these Floyd vs great WWs, Floyd is really a LW-JWW.that was good enough to be top WWS, that size really goes against him in these debates. His size doesn't matter cause Floyd would be facing a trash fighter why is that quote always said as if sugar was advanced he wasnt edgar moved similar in punch style to sugar but more advanced and quicker he was caught by a quick great counter and got up and had to start retreating cause he had nothing to give floyd trouble they all look stiff and outdated he tiptoed alot and looked sloopy throwing punches inside the body The era often at times looked lost or hesitant Floyd runs through him

What bums who beat Robinson? He might have meant he fought over 90% bums. SRR is history polished, no doubt was great but his resume is really poor, I actually think he wouldn't be anywhere near as big today, I tell you something just extend Ennis resume to 200 bouts with 90% being the same class he has been fighting and he would have 200 wins and at least 180 kos , now how would that look in history in the 1940s. Could Floyd beat him maybe, the biggest issue is Floyd is such a small WW when looking at history's greatest WWs, in all these Floyd vs great WWs, Floyd is really a LW-JWW.that was good enough to be top WWS, that size really goes against him in these debates.

Most people claiming SRR as the P4P great never seen him box. Floyd 12-0 him. If you seen both you wouldnt give those rounds cause floyd wouldnt need 12 to get rid of that guy who was way to outdated and looked trash compared to people even early in Floyd's time a man named edgar moved similar in punch style to sugar but more advanced and quicker he was caught by a quick great counter and got up and had to start retreating cause he had nothing to give floyd trouble So floyd runs though srr in 1

Most people claiming SRR as the P4P great never seen him box. Floyd 12-0 him.

Robinson is over hyped man, lots of the ancient fighters from the old days were stat padders. They all feasted on the bums of the months club. Mayweather easily outboxes Robinson. they all look stiff and outdated he tiptoed alot and looked sloopy throwing punches inside the body The era often at times looked lost or hesitant Also missing lots of advanced movements Floyd's era had people who he beat who were way more advanced then srr era which looks trash only crazy idiots say a man that outdated beats floyd

Robinson is over hyped man, lots of the ancient fighters from the old days were stat padders. They all feasted on the bums of the months club. Mayweather easily outboxes Robinson.

Yes but I'm not so sure he'd get the nod. SRR activity might get him the nod. I know Mayweather isn't getting sparked though. He'll go the 12 and lose on the cards at worst. Srr fought in the 40s floyd was in 90s like thats a way more advanced era like you need to watch matches saying stupid stuff the 40s were trash compared they all look stiff and outdated srr activity as it was would get him koed cause he tiptoed alot and looked sloopy throwing punches inside the body The era often at times looked lost or hesitant this is the same era you crazy people say Louis would do good was from vs people in 70s-90s which he had the same outdated skills and movement these dudes look horrible compare to 70s-90s you would be able to see this if you had good vision or watched matches everything I say is fact on video Floyd fought people in amateurs who moved better on top of more advanced movement with skills

Yes but I'm not so sure he'd get the nod. SRR activity might get him the nod. I know Mayweather isn't getting sparked though. He'll go the 12 and lose on the cards at worst.

Floyd 12-0s SRR. SRR was small guy with narrow frame. They're on par in size and Floyd is light years more skilled. Stop comparing 40s-50s' primitive guys with modern fighters. Let me get this straight Ali's style which came from srr but Ali was more updated with it and his style didn't work good in 80s,Ali clinched alot,bounced to much which joe/cooper begin to be able to read and countered him easy,had hands down low often,used head movement but not the way modern used it which was head/blocking with hands, So if Ali's style was out of date In 80s with people who copied it who were more advanced then him how is it srr a more flawed less advanced ver of ali as I explained beats floyd,makes no sense at all Everybody who said srr is a crazy idiot in the comments this goes for everybody ever on every site people Floyd fought were way more advanced then srr and that whole era the post should be named floyd would beat srr cause floyd wouldnt need any chances vs a person that outdated he would win for a fact

Floyd has little chance against anyone he's underdog to, he don't fight ATG prime fighters at their best

Floyd don't have a win over 1 all time great in their prime he would stay at lightweight and you Floyd boys would say he is too small Give him some fantasy fights over some prime b fighters he stands a better chance

Floyd was one of the greatest of his generation. But thinking that the man who won a narrow split decision over a washed Oscar would beat SRR is simply not a logical position. It comes as no surprise that many of the posters claiming Floyd would win sound like emotional children defending their favorite superhero. Maybe PBF vs SRR would be a fairer fight