If Froch loses

I'm gonna disregard the Flyweight/Featherweight portion of the thread, but to answer the losing part. No, he shouldn't retire. He's still in great condition to fight. Why do people think just because a fighter loses one or two fights he should retire? That's one of the things that annoys the shiit out of me on this website.

http://www.threadbombing.com/data/media/43/i-see-what-you-did-there.jpg

I say he goes to bantamweight.... he could clean up that division.

Should he retire or step down to flyweight or featherweight? :nonono: Froch dosen't have many fights left at 34, anyhow I dont see him beating Ward but if he loses like most people expect there's a couple of decent domestic fights against Groves and DeGale that might be tempting or he could try going after Kessler or Bute.

Should he retire or step down to flyweight or featherweight? He can still fight,rematch with Kessler,Dirrell,Pascal,fight Bute.Losing to Ward is not a death sentence.

Should he retire or step down to flyweight or featherweight? What the ?!?!?

http://www.gifsforum.com/images/gif/wtf/grand/bush_wtf.gif

wat? :wtf1: And you mean WHEN Froch loses.. Froch isnt in the same league as Ward. Waaay too slow for Ward

What?........