I mean come on, just because he lost to Marquez hes an hype job? He already fought Marquez 2 times before and he always looked not good against him. And dont forget all of Mannys impressive victories! To call him a hype job is nonsense. The guy was a former featherweight who destroyed some of the best welterweights!
well i guess he was a hypejob, cuz everyone thought he'd ko marquez
but now i think he's probabley underrated, basically what always goes on, never any inbetween
There's a lot of truth to the hyperboles of Pacs greatness.
However.
I think it is perfectly clear he is NOT this superevolved wrecking machine that "has developed so much since 2008". Hes the same pretty much. Some tweaks here and there, but most of his 135+ run is due to favorable matchups stylistically. (and thats not pacs fault. Hes fought whats out there pretty much except for mayweather)
So is he a hypejob? No.
But hes historically overrated (by casualfans and by media). Hes not on the level of greatness as Robinson, Armstrong or Duran. Not even close. And that is probably the beef people have with his media exposure the last few years.
Its funny that people call Pac a hypejob now!
That's why it's so stupid for Mayweather to duck the hypejob. Easy work, easy money. "Take the test, Pac!"
What a joke.
;-)
I mean come on, just because he lost to Marquez hes an hype job? He already fought Marquez 2 times before and he always looked not good against him. And dont forget all of Mannys impressive victories! To call him a hype job is nonsense. The guy was a former featherweight who destroyed some of the best welterweights!
those who arent dumb knew his only true legit win was against cotto a damaged cotto at that everyone else was real suspect. like how do u fight the losers of fights not the winners lol ehhhh bob did a good job tho