do you even understand the damage that can be caused in just 3 rounds of fighting, especially 3 rounds more after having already warred for 12?
our warriors pay a price to do what they do. I'm not going to tell them to "dig into their pockets somemore" just so that you may feel fully entertained by their carnage.............Rockin':boxing:
I understand believe me. Which is why I said ONLY in title fights and "special" occasions. In some cases the extra rounds is what showcases and determines how great champions really are.
I have much respect for all boxers, except mouthy ones- haha.
Yes but at what cost? We enjoy all those fights and is the golden era of boxing but you have to think also about the well being of the fighters considering they have no union to protect them. I was a big Wilfred Benitez fan and I enjoyed all the great fights he had but look at him now? he looks really bad and look at Ali, look at Fraizer RIP he was in really bad health years before he passed away. 3 more rounds might not look like much in one fight but after three fights you are fighting 45 rounds insted of only 36.
In Ali's case, I don't think boxing led to his Parkinsons disease. His brother has it as well, so Casius Clay the factory worker may have gotten it anyway. IMHO.
You listen too much to the HBO bull ****. It wouldnt matter if it went 15 rounds or 100 rounds the judges would have given it to Manny Pacquiao just because he is "suppose" to win
Yes but at what cost? We enjoy all those fights and is the golden era of boxing but you have to think also about the well being of the fighters considering they have no union to protect them. I was a big Wilfred Benitez fan and I enjoyed all the great fights he had but look at him now? he looks really bad and look at Ali, look at Fraizer RIP he was in really bad health years before he passed away. 3 more rounds might not look like much in one fight but after three fights you are fighting 45 rounds insted of only 36.
For superfights they should be 15 jusaying..
And yet that was the golden age of Boxing am I right?
Yes but at what cost? We enjoy all those fights and is the golden era of boxing but you have to think also about the well being of the fighters considering they have no union to protect them. I was a big Wilfred Benitez fan and I enjoyed all the great fights he had but look at him now? he looks really bad and look at Ali, look at Fraizer RIP he was in really bad health years before he passed away. 3 more rounds might not look like much in one fight but after three fights you are fighting 45 rounds insted of only 36.
I prefer judges who aren't paid off to give a certain fighter the win. :rofl:
You think adding rounds will stop the corruption in boxing? Thats the most hilarious thing ever.
I agree, this is the real issue.
You can't use this fight as a case to bring back 15 rounds.
15 rounds is too much if you look back to most of the fighters of that era most of them suffer from health problems. Look at Benitez, Ali, Gomez and many other fighters they are in really bad health.
And yet that was the golden age of Boxing am I right?
I think the old days of unlimited rounds now has a lot of merit... It's the only sure fire way of stopping corrupt judges, no way to win but by knocking the other guy out or your opponent quitting! Not going to happen i know ...
15 rounds is too much if you look back to most of the fighters of that era most of them suffer from health problems. Look at Benitez, Ali, Gomez and many other fighters they are in really bad health.
I prefer judges who aren't paid off to give a certain fighter the win. :rofl:
You think adding rounds will stop the corruption in boxing? Thats the most hilarious thing ever.
It's a business. Grow up. 20 years from now, Juan will still be losing sleep over this and he will have no one else to blame but himself or he can where those damn t-shirts his Momma gave him. Rofl.
I don't think it will stop the corruption in boxing, but I do think it promotes for KO's. In which both sides needed last night.