Comments Thread For: Hearn: If Pacquiao Needs a Foe, Kell Brook is Ready

Kell Brook is not even the WBO #1. Mike Jones is ranked ahead of him. he used to be #1 for a long time under warren, because warren expected pac to vacate. but matchroom went after the IBF and WBA rankings so now he's #1 WBA instead.

why would hearn send his biggest star in for one big payday which would end up kells last one? sorry but pac would ruin kell brooks' career right now

pacroid is not going to fight and real challengers.. they have to be a floyd leftover.. a top rank washed up bum.. that's it. just go research his resume.

i appreciate hes wbo no.1 but his biggest wins are jennings(shot),polish bloke(who),n'dounothing against brook or hearni just thinkif he could beat the likes of a malignaggi,joines,berto,khan then he would probably have a more prestigious belt at 147 ,would be known in the u.s therfore would be more likely to get a shot.:ok: Kell Brook is not even the WBO #1. Mike Jones is ranked ahead of him.

Lol I am calm bro But people on here just don't have a clue sometimes. Look at the posts on this thread. Boxing is officially a popularity contest. Boxers work their way up the rankings so they can fight the champ. Should we just do away with the ranking system all together? Now I know the ranking system sucks sometimes but Brook has been number one contender for a while now and just keeps getting passed over. Why? Because he is not popular? That shouldn't matter. Someone says Jones is now the number one contender now, is that because he is more popular? Let Jones and Brook fight each other then and the winner gets pac. Do I think either will beat pac? No I don't, but fair is fair. They've worked there way up to being mandatory challengers and deserve their shot. Like I said before, boxing is officially a popularity contest. i agree with you,its not a popularity contest all i'm saying is when it comes to manny and floyd opponents its whoevers got something to offer in terms of a belt(ortiz,baldomir) or a name to have on your record mosley) gonna sell the fight hence why they fought mosley.this thread is regarding hearn putting brook up as a manny foe and i just think as of now hes not in the mix.i appreciate hes wbo no.1 but his biggest wins are jennings(shot),polish bloke(who),n'dounothing against brook or hearni just thinkif he could beat the likes of a malignaggi,joines,berto,khan then he would probably have a more prestigious belt at 147 ,would be known in the u.s therfore would be more likely to get a shot.:ok:

Kell who? At least beat paper champ Senchenko first and pick up a belt. Lol, Brook had a mando fight for his belt already... but Senchenko already set his one mandotory for next year.

Kell who? At least beat paper champ Senchenko first and pick up a belt.

Kell who? Why do no name fighters who the american public don't know $hit about always talking about fighting Pac or May? Dude it will never happen so move on. Amir khan is the new Ricky Hatton and kell Brook is the new Jr Witter.

Lol I am calm bro But people on here just don't have a clue sometimes. Look at the posts on this thread. Boxing is officially a popularity contest. Boxers work their way up the rankings so they can fight the champ. Should we just do away with the ranking system all together? Now I know the ranking system sucks sometimes but Brook has been number one contender for a while now and just keeps getting passed over. Why? Because he is not popular? That shouldn't matter. Someone says Jones is now the number one contender now, is that because he is more popular? Let Jones and Brook fight each other then and the winner gets pac. Do I think either will beat pac? No I don't, but fair is fair. They've worked there way up to being mandatory challengers and deserve their shot. Like I said before, boxing is officially a popularity contest. Paper titles have paper rankings. He is looking for a shortcut and a payday. Otherwise he would've taken out a name by now instead of protecting his "0" and the fans would've demanded him for a bigger name instead of his camp doing it for him. Senchenko is the way to guy for this guy. If he can get through him , Khan and Pac would be a likely route

So what you are saying is that the number 1 contender/mandatory to face pac doesn't deserve a fight against pac until he beats a couple of people that aint even in his weight class? Lol the logic of some people. I'm not a Brook fan but I'm a firm believer in champs fighting their mandatory o . Pac gets a pass as usualpponents :burnup:calm down,look you know how it is,manny fights twice a year,he fights whoever he can make the most money against.no one really knows brook in the u.s all im saying is he needs to raise his profile dramatically to get a fight wiv manny. Lol I am calm bro But people on here just don't have a clue sometimes. Look at the posts on this thread. Boxing is officially a popularity contest. Boxers work their way up the rankings so they can fight the champ. Should we just do away with the ranking system all together? Now I know the ranking system sucks sometimes but Brook has been number one contender for a while now and just keeps getting passed over. Why? Because he is not popular? That shouldn't matter. Someone says Jones is now the number one contender now, is that because he is more popular? Let Jones and Brook fight each other then and the winner gets pac. Do I think either will beat pac? No I don't, but fair is fair. They've worked there way up to being mandatory challengers and deserve their shot. Like I said before, boxing is officially a popularity contest.

So what you are saying is that the number 1 contender/mandatory to face pac doesn't deserve a fight against pac until he beats a couple of people that aint even in his weight class? Lol the logic of some people. I'm not a Brook fan but I'm a firm believer in champs fighting their mandatory o . Pac gets a pass as usualpponents :burnup:calm down,look you know how it is,manny fights twice a year,he fights whoever he can make the most money against.no one really knows brook in the u.s all im saying is he needs to raise his profile dramatically to get a fight wiv manny.

Stay ducking Floyd...:boxing:

Ok, I'm oficially calling Manny out. I've had 70+ amateur fights, won 55 - that makes me legit to get a million dollar fight with Manny, because I called him out right? Who the **** does Kell Brook think he is? Everyone wants to fight Manny Pacquiao, he's the P4P King and he's the cashcow of the sport. Really, there's enough guys wanting to fight Pacquiao or Mayweather.

ADBB (Another Delusional British Bum)

im ranked no.4 by the wbo and ive never even had a fight so id like to throw my name into the mix for mannys next opponent.brook is most likely to get a fight wiv khan,talk of fighting manny is nonsense.maybe in a few years if he could beat khan,berto,bradley etc. So what you are saying is that the number 1 contender/mandatory to face pac doesn't deserve a fight against pac until he beats a couple of people that aint even in his weight class? Lol the logic of some people. I'm not a Brook fan but I'm a firm believer in champs fighting their mandatory opponents. Pac gets a pass as usual.

im ranked no.4 by the wbo and ive never even had a fight so id like to throw my name into the mix for mannys next opponent.brook is most likely to get a fight wiv khan,talk of fighting manny is nonsense.maybe in a few years if he could beat khan,berto,bradley etc.

Kell Brook, what's his ranking at PFP?

It's that easy huh? gtfo

was that hearn pulling a frank warren out of his ass? :)) the pacman fight will never happen, because the WBO is a joke. they even had brook as #1 contender for a long time. moving on, good news is that they are in talks for a senchenko fight. there is a real need for someone to fight this guy and pick up the WBA strap.

Kelly Brook beats Khan, Martinez, Manny, and Floyd all in one night without breaking a sweat. Kelly is the GOAT. Anyone who disagrees with me doesnt know **** about boxing!