If this is right, are Patards gonna start calling Pac a coward and claim that he is "putting up roadblocks"? I guess this means that Pac doesn't want the fight, right?
http://www.philstar.com/sportsarticle.aspx?articleid=742849&publicationsubcategoryid=69
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/sports/boxingmma/floyd-mayweather%E2%80%99s-revenge-manny-pacquiao-unnecessary-again
Oh I thought it's all dependent on PPVs sold for both boxers.
This is what I've been reading from Floyd fans.
As a Pac fan I would accept Pac getting less if the Marquez 3
fell short of the Floyd/Ortiz ppv.
Question is are Floyd fans amenable to Floyd getting less if
the Marquez 3 sold more than the Ortiz/Floyd fight?
:usa:
I don't think floyd apologists will even bother answering that question, homie. But you can see how butt hurt they are when they're given the same dose of medicine they've been giving us for years, ie, Floyd is the PPV king, he's entitled to bigger split yada yada...
This is part of the mind games they've been playing and when the tables are turned, they get butthurt all of a sudden.
;-)
And why is that? Because Pactards act like Pac has not blame in the fight not coming off already. HE DOES!
Can you blame PAC? Lol! Floyd had 40 fights then asks OSDT against so called easy and 1 dimensional midget. Can you name me one major boxing event that even followed Floyd OSDT, a major PPV boxing event that didn't push through because there was no OSDT? ...............none.
pac the big coward..no test..wants a bigger purse..what a cheating scumbag that guy is :lol1:
eemmm me nice man eeemm me no like fight hard fight eeem ummm aammmm me need arum to make easy fight eemmm :rofl: sahshsahiashashioashiahahaha
im pretty sure if Floyd seriously wants this fight, everything has been agreed on, 50/50, Pac doesnt have a choice.
Everyone wants to see this fight and if Pac declines, even hardcore pac fans will get angry at him
He was misquoted, he just said it has to be 50/50. Should be equal. He said it in the news in the Philippines.
"Misquoted" by Philstar? Give me a break!
But Flomos keep bringing up that Manny "ducked" the first negotiation that was 2009. :lol1:
And why is that? Because Pactards act like Pac has not blame in the fight not coming off already. HE DOES!
First of all if Pac wants 75-25 he is entitiled to it because he already has outsold floyd for the year with one more fight to go. That fight will do at least 1.2 mill ppv's so thats 2.5 total in one year. Thats more than floyd could ever dream of doing in one year.
Floyd had his chance at 50-50 before the Clottey fight. Pac is by far the bigger draw now.
75-25 Pacquiao, fight takes place anywhere except for Vegas cuz of xylocaine, no drug tests unless they are done by the state commission, Reyes gloves, Pac comes out second and gets announced second since he's the true champ at 147 and 10 million for every pound over since floyd has a history of cheating the scales.
Take it or leave it cuz Pac can fight Canelo for $65 million guaranteed upfront in Mexico anytime.
If this is right, are Patards gonna start calling Pac a coward and claim that he is "putting up roadblocks"? I guess this means that Pac doesn't want the fight, right?
http://www.philstar.com/sportsarticle.aspx?articleid=742849&publicationsubcategoryid=69
http://www.opposingviews.com/i/sports/boxingmma/floyd-mayweather%E2%80%99s-revenge-manny-pacquiao-unnecessary-again
He was misquoted, he just said it has to be 50/50. Should be equal. He said it in the news in the Philippines.
why are you guys posting articles from months ago to refute something pac said a few days ago
But Flomos keep bringing up that Manny "ducked" the first negotiation that was 2009. :lol1:
why are you guys posting articles from months ago to refute something pac said a few days ago
I am trying to show him what a b*tch he is being. He is using articles from the 1st negotiations and what floyd said then, to defend what Pac is saying now. Too bad Pac and team were saying the same things.
http://www.examiner.com/boxing-in-norfolk/manny-pacquiao-vs-floyd-mayweather-fight-could-rest-on-60-40-split
Heres another 60/40?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/boxing/8432085.stm
And 100m?
Manny asking for 60-40
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/dec/03/sports/la-sp-pacquiao-mayweather3-2009dec03
http://www.boxingscene.com/mayweather-pacquiao-arum-says-no-issues-remain--42270
According to Top Rank's CEO Bob Arum, there are no remaining issues to prevent a possible mega-fight between Manny Pacquiao and Floyd Mayweather Jr. - provided Mayweather defeats WBC champion Victor Ortiz on September 17 and Pacquiao beats Marquez on November 12.
Arum said -*"there are no issues."
I was momentarily stunned by that assertion but picked up my gumshield and moved forward.
"No issues, Bob, what about the drug testing?" I said.
"You tell me me what*are the issues," Arum said.
"Drug testing and who handles it," I said weakly.
"There are no issues on that," Arum said. "We accepted the drug testing. That is not a real issue of any kind."
Hey, wait a minute big fella, what about the WADA/USADA dustups?
"It is a non-issue, I am telling you," Arum said. "Because USADA can only handle drug testing in the United States. The USADA can't go there - and that's where Manny will do the first part of his training *- and that is that."
Arum explained that testing for this portion of Pacman's training camp would be done by a Filipino lab working under the approval of and procedures of WADA.
Although Arum was not explicit on testing of Pacquiao while he's in America, presumably USADA would be involved with the Nevada State Athletic Commission also having a role.
OK, Bob, then what about the money split, isn't that contentious enough to forestall the so called dream fight?
"There are no issues on that," Arum said. "The split is 50-50 on everything."
Oh I thought it's all dependent on PPVs sold for both boxers.
This is what I've been reading from Floyd fans.
As a Pac fan I would accept Pac getting less if the Marquez 3
fell short of the Floyd/Ortiz ppv.
Question is are Floyd fans amenable to Floyd getting less if
the Marquez 3 sold more than the Ortiz/Floyd fight?
:usa:
and that article was written when?
:dead1:
http://www.examiner.com/boxing-in-norfolk/manny-pacquiao-vs-floyd-mayweather-fight-could-rest-on-60-40-split
Heres another 60/40?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/boxing/8432085.stm
And 100m?