http://ringsidereport.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Amir-Khan-header11.jpg
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_DVtXeEmZO7s/SagSNyOWs4I/AAAAAAAABf8/wXubezjZjGc/s400/eagle_muppet.jpg
LMFAO,
Fame and fortune makes any man good looking
http://www.profileking.org/comments/Funny/18.jpg
It's astonishing how ignorant clowns like you seem to be obsessed with homosexuality. To me it's an obscenity, and my wife and 4 chldren have agreed in the past if and when we ever saw a news item about.
You sound like a sick kid with just enough inside your head to make a rattling sound. The discussion was about the appearance of who is-to me- a very ordinary looking kid. And it seems to many others as well. But what the hell difference does that make to anyone, except it's a stupid subject to make a thread about.
Go away and don't bother me, cretin.
the only thing thats mystrerious is how he aint been knocked out again, but fighting a load of bums would do that i geus, as for been good looking thats just another con.
But I see from your sig you bet on one of those bums to win by TKO.
Red K for being a hater.
amir is a good looking kid to girls. he has that dark and handsome look. and he looks mysterious that women go crazy about.
the only thing thats mystrerious is how he aint been knocked out again, but fighting a load of bums would do that i geus, as for been good looking thats just another con.
You have said what I was thinking, but in a more direct way. There's no accounting for taste and we often see the most oddly matched couples. But certainly, on a scale of 1-10, for "good looks" in my opinion, which is rather better than most, Khan would be at around a
3-4, maximum. He doesn't even have a single "good looking" feature, except his bank baklance.
We, including myself, are really foolish for even making this a subject for discussion.
As for De La Hoya, whom someone mentioned. He is a bit higher on the scale. I have very rigorous standards in this matter. What I notice most is his tiny nose and huge jaw and large cheeks. Perfect for a 6prizefighter. There are and have been multitudes who are far "better looking" than he.Never understood all the hoopla about his appearance. He himself is a narcissist, as was shown by his displaying himself in womens' clothing, byt there are some who sre in lo e with themselves. He is or was, one.
And we mustn't forget that posed camera shots are just that, posed to take advantage of light, shadow, angles etc.to minimize and maximize any good or bad features. Then they're manipulated in the photo lab. and we see only the acceptable ones. They are not "cell phone flashes"............
http://www.profileking.org/comments/Funny/18.jpg
No homo but if you do a survey at least 6 out of 10 women would find the guy ugly. Only HBO and you say he has good looks.
You have said what I was thinking, but in a more direct way. There's no accounting for taste and we often see the most oddly matched couples. But certainly, on a scale of 1-10, for "good looks" in my opinion, which is rather better than most, Khan would be at around a
3-4, maximum. He doesn't even have a single "good looking" feature, except his bank baklance.
We, including myself, are really foolish for even making this a subject for discussion.
As for De La Hoya, whom someone mentioned. He is a bit higher on the scale. I have very rigorous standards in this matter. What I notice most is his tiny nose and huge jaw and large cheeks. Perfect for a 6prizefighter. There are and have been multitudes who are far "better looking" than he.Never understood all the hoopla about his appearance. He himself is a narcissist, as was shown by his displaying himself in womens' clothing, byt there are some who sre in lo e with themselves. He is or was, one.
And we mustn't forget that posed camera shots are just that, posed to take advantage of light, shadow, angles etc.to minimize and maximize any good or bad features. Then they're manipulated in the photo lab. and we see only the acceptable ones. They are not "cell phone flashes"............
He's lightning fast but still has many flaws. I think he can still improve a lot. His conditioning is much better now, he was getting knocked down against SFWs (Willie Limond) and now he survived a huge onslaught from a beast like Maidana.
True and the guy is only 24 I don’t expect him to reach his prime for another 4/5 years if he keeps fighting a good level of competition and carries on the steady progression made under Roach who’s to say Amir cant be the next big star in boxing?
He's lightning fast but still has many flaws. I think he can still improve a lot. His conditioning is much better now, he was getting knocked down against SFWs (Willie Limond) and now he survived a huge onslaught from a beast like Maidana.
No homo but if you do a survey at least 6 out of 10 women would find the guy ugly. Only HBO and you say he has good looks.
You spend your time conducting surveys questioning the looks of other men?
I bet you pluck your eyebrows like Cotto.
14y ago
Would Amir Khan be the star that he is without his good looks? | BoxingScene Community