Virgil hunter discusses andre ward's sparring injury

VIRGIL HUNTER DISCUSSES ANDRE WARD'S SPARRING INJURY By Doveed Linder In this interview, WBA super middleweight champion Andre Ward’s trainer, Virgil Hunter, discusses what happened the day Ward suffered a cut in sparring, which lead to the postponement of his fight against WBC champion Carl Froch in the finals of the Super Six World Boxing Classic. He also talks about recent remarks made by Froch, the possibility of a Ward-Bute fight, and his thoughts on Mayweather-Ortiz, Pacquiao-Marquez, Hopkins-Dawson, and Cotto-Margarito. DL: How exactly did Andre Ward get cut? What took place in the gym? VH: It was just a freak accident. I didn’t see a punch or anything. He had his face guard on and the whole bit. It’s really unbelievable and mind boggling how he sustained that cut. It’s nothing that I can identify, where I can say this situation here is probably how he got cut. It’s not something I can put my finger on, so I just let it go. I just have no clue. DL: So he’s sparring and at one point you just realized that he was cut? VH: His sparring partner saw it first. He’s sparring and the next thing you know, Brandon (the sparring partner) said, “Dre, you're bleeding.” And when he came back to the corner, I saw blood on the bridge of his nose. And my first reaction was, “How in the heck did you get a scratch on the bridge of your nose?” because he was wearing the face guard. And then as he got closer, I saw blood in other places and then I saw the cut and I wasn’t expecting to see that. So that’s pretty much all I can tell you. DL: Is the plan now to break from camp and rest until it’s time to get ready for the later date? VH: We have a routine that we have that calls for rest AND activity. So we’re going to stick to our routine and then we’ll ease back to where we were at the appropriate time, whenever they come up with the new date. DL: Carl Froch has gone on record that he is dissatisfied with the situation. He puts the blame on Andre. What are your thoughts on some of these remarks? VH: I’m not surprised at his response, but I’m kind of disappointed because he’s displaying an abundance of amnesia. If you go to his fight with Arthur Abraham, he stalled Abraham for months. Five days before the fight, he came up with a back injury that was never verified that put the fight back two months. He came up with a back injury AND a chest cold. And his statement was, “I’ve done some things in the past, but in a fight like this I would be foolish to fight in this condition.” So it sounds pretty foolish for him to comment like that (on Andre’s cut), but that’s who he is, that’s what he’s about, and you just take it for who he is. But he needs to remember his situation with Abraham. DL: What is your assessment of Carl Froch as a fighter? What makes him effective and what holes do you see in his game? VH: He’s been effective against guys who are shorter than him, guys he has a reach on. But guys who have boxing ability, I’ve seen him lose to them. They gave him the against Dirrell, but Dirrell beat him. And Mikkel Kessler beat him. They gave him the Dirrell fight, because they were in Nottingham . So really, he’s 2-2 in the tournament . So what do you look for? I see a guy who boxes shorter guys and I see he has problems with boxing ability and speed. So somewhere along the line, we find our niche. DL: Provided you win the Super Six, are you looking at a fight with Lucian Bute if Bute beats Glen Johnson? VH: Not necessarily. Showtime promised Mikkel Kessler a fight with the Super Six winner. I think Bute should really beat a Carl Froch or an Andre Dirrell, because it would make the fight more interesting . He should either fight the guy who loses in the finals or he should fight a guy who is Super Six caliber. I don’t think he should get rewarded with the Super Six winner and just hop, skip and jump over high end competition. Kessler is the champion emeritus and Showtime promised him the fight. And we intend to keep that obligation if we win. For two reasons… Number one, it’s the obligation. And number two, we’re not pleased with him using the excuses that he’s used on why he lost to us. So we want to give him an opportunity to prove that the fight was a fluke. We want him to really be there this time, so there are no more excuses. He’s lived off of excuses for two years now. . We want to give him the opportunity to prove that that wasn’t the real Mikkel Kessler. If that wasn’t the real Mikkel Kessler, then we want to beat the real one.

Comments (1)

DL: As far as Bute goes, do you not consider Glen Johnson an opponent that catapults him to the winner of the Super Six? VH: I would see that as a fight for him to fight the loser of the Super Six, but not the winner. DL: How do you see Bute-Johnson playing out? VH: First of all, I’m a Glen Johnson fan. But from what I saw in the Froch fight, he’s slowing up. I can’t say he’s slowing up because of his age. But you can only go back so many times and make this weight after all these years. The first time he did it, it was okay. But the second time he did it, it had an impact. He faded in the later rounds. I don’t care who you are. You just can’t go back and take your body through this at his age and expect to perform at the highest level. No matter what kind of nutrition, no matter what kind of conditioning… So I see Bute winning that fight based on the fact that Johnson has to go through a lot of changes to make 168. DL: I would like to get your thoughts on a few other fights, starting with Floyd Mayweather's win over Victor Ortiz. There was quite a bit of controversy in that fight. What’s your take? VH: It’s very simple. If Ortiz hadn’t blatantly butted him, we wouldn’t have had that conclusion. I’m not going to judge the conclusion, because the average person on the outside of the ring, in their right frame of mind so to speak, as a fan and as a spectator, quite naturally, they’re going to comprehend it negatively. But you get a person who’s been fouled who has that adrenaline flowing, he’s going to respond differently. You have a fan’s response, you have an anti-Mayweather response, and you have an opinionated response. And if he did something wrong, he should have been penalized. But if he wasn’t penalized, he didn’t do anything wrong. So people have to draw their own conclusions. But there’s a written rule in boxing: Protect yourself at all times. Ortiz left himself open and it was a bone-headed move. He should have been ready to fight and he shouldn’t have head butted the kid. And not only did he head butt him, he threw a punch after that. He instigated a situation that caused the fight to end that way. So me personally, I put the responsibility on Ortiz. DL: What’s your take on the third fight between Manny Pacquiao-Juan Manuel Marquez? VH: I think it’s a matter of size. I think the size difference and the age difference. Marquez is a great technician and I expect him to have his moments. But he’s in a situation where he could literally be overwhelmed. He’s just giving up too much. I don’t expect him to weigh 144. He might come in at 139. It’s just too much for him. I might be wrong. But if I have to make a prediction, I just see him being overwhelmed in this situation. DL: How about Bernard Hopkins-Chad Dawson? VH: You can never count Bernard Hopkins out of a fight. And we really see that now. Although, Chad Dawson and Jean Pascal are two different fighters. Given the best Chad Dawson I’ve seen, you still can’t count Bernard Hopkins out of the fight. There are just some things he understands and he knows that he can exploit. It just depends if Chad can impose his youth on Bernard and if Bernard can impose his guile on Chad. And the reason I’m saying this is because Chad did fight a lackluster fight against Pascal. So once you see a fighter fight a certain way, the potential that he’s going to fight that way again is there. It’s not like a faucet where you can turn it on and off. I haven’t picked a winner in this fight. I think it’s going to be a great fight and an interesting fight. I do think Chad is motivated. I think it’s good that he’s staying at home (for training). He needs to be with Scully (his trainer), he needs to be who he originally was. But you can never ever count out Bernard Hopkins and Naazim Richardson. Naazim is a chemist and he knows what to mix up in the lab. It’s going to be an interesting fight, but I have no clear cut winner. But Bernard has found his niche. He’s standing his ground. And it’s very interesting to see a guy like Archie Moore, when Moore stood his ground at that age. At forty-six, he was knocking people out. So it’s going to be youth versus experience. Simple as that. DL: Lastly, what are your thoughts on the Miguel Cotto-Antonio Margarito rematch? VH: I don’t think Margarito is the same fighter he was when he fought him the first time, and I think Cotto knows what he has to do. There are a lot of questions as far as, what if he did and what if he didn’t (referring to the possibility of Margarito having a plaster-like substance in his handwraps in their first fight). It was shocking to see Cotto go downhill all of a sudden and the way he looked in that fight. He looked like he was mugged with a black jack. But there’s no proof, so I can’t say in fact that Margarito was out of compliance. Cotto seems anxious to get on with the fight. He has the confidence to know that this will be a fair fight. If he feels like he was cheated in the first fight, he’s not saying. But I think Margarito has definitely slowed up. I think he’s burned out. And the way he moved against Pacquiao, I think he over-trains. Although he’s at a weight that he can make. But you don’t recover from the kind of punishment he took against Pacquiao. Not at that age. That stays with you. That really affects you. You just can’t get beat on like that and be the same person. He is NOT the same fighter. I don’t care how he looks, how he trains… He is not the same fighter after taking that kind of punishment. And now he’s getting ready to spar and do everything else and you take punishment in sparring. At that age, it catches up to you. So I’m favoring Cotto in that fight. DL: Anything in closing? VH: No, nothing really. We’re on track. And I’ve been saying all along that we’ve only been seeing seventy percent of Andre Ward. And when he fights Froch, I think he’s going to be ninety percent. Every time people think he’s one thing, every time they put a definition on him, they always end up being wrong. And this is the fight that’s going to prove that. This fight will not go the distance. He’s going to stop Carl Froch.

14y ago