Is Pacquiao's camp flip-flopping (video)

so if and when a flomo fan starts doing to other boxers what they are doing to pac when it comes to OST issues.. if and when a flomo starts creating thread after thread, ragging other fighters not doing OST before fighting.. i'd be the first one to give him props.. i'd even give him greens and all the points i have if i've got any..

Floyd is the Naazim Richardson of boxing.

Notice that I used that very statement as AN EXAMPLE (hence the word "example").I don't know these people anymore than you do,yet the difference is,you will lie and act codependent for Manny,whereas I am calling it as I see it. Also note that I don't view boxers the same as you do.I don't idolize them.I respect what they do IN the ring,and it ends there.Most of these guys are far from role models-that includes "your boy" as well. Around here you have to be as subtle as a brick....even then, the retreads don't get it. SMH hahaha.. lie.. hey.. i'm not the one 'twisting' facts here.. remember your 'not seeking a fight' post.. and if you're calling it as it is, then why not start with the hypocrisy of this OST issue? you keep on harping about pac but won't rag other boxers that are actively fighting without it.. how fscking biased and hypocritical of you.. and if you're really calling it as it is.. then you'd know that this OST issue is just a pissing contest between two fighter on top of their game with huge egos.. now that's calling it as it is..

If I were to use subtleties,it would fly over your head.If you overlook facts in front of your face,how the hell are you going to understand subtleties????!!! If I am blatant or deliberate,it is because I have little faith in your comprehension. if i can discern your hippocrisy, when you're trying so hard to mask it as logic, then i don't think i'd have any trouble if, and that's a big if, you start being subtle.. and another thing, just like floyd, i don't have to worry when it comes to having a 'debate' with you cause you're pwning yourself just fine with your own contradiction..

you really are a conflicted fellow.. in one statement you condemn one thing then totally contradicts what you've wrote in the next one.. and without subtlety at all.. Notice that I used that very statement as AN EXAMPLE (hence the word "example") of the merry-go-round type debate that could go on and on if people don't stick with the topic at hand or what was relevant to the debate at the moment-he just randomly added a topic that had nothing to do with what was being discussed. I don't know these people anymore than you do,yet the difference is,you will lie and act codependent for Manny,whereas I am calling it as I see it. Also note that I don't view boxers the same as you do.I don't idolize them.I respect and dissect what they do IN the ring (though the exception in this case is why I think they aren't fighting),and it ends there.Most of these guys are far from role models-that includes "your boy" as well. Around here you have to be as subtle as a brick....even then, the retreads don't get it. SMH

i'm actually sticking to the topic. i answered all your questions regarding the negotiations didn't i? but sure. so you won't be bothered, please consider the other topic in question dropped. How are you sticking to the topic when talking about Floyd making a racist comment?????? Look at the title. SMH

you really are a conflicted fellow.. in one statement you condemn one thing then totally contradicts what you've wrote in the next one.. and without subtlety at all.. If I were to use subtleties,it would fly over your head.If you overlook facts in front of your face,how the hell are you going to understand subtleties????!!! If I am blatant or deliberate,it is because I have little faith in your comprehension.

Not bothered at all. What we are talking about is the drug testing and negotiations,not personalities and character flaws.We could be here all day if you wanna talk about guys who claim to be with god while cheating on their wife and knocking up whores....(example) This debate isn't about morals or character,it is about the drug testing/negotiations. Do you understand why it is important to stick to the topic???? you really are a conflicted fellow.. in one statement you condemn one thing then totally contradicts what you've wrote in the next one.. and without subtlety at all..

Not bothered at all. What we are talking about is the drug testing and negotiations,not personalities and character flaws.We could be here all day if you wanna talk about guys who claim to be with god while cheating on their wife and knocking up whores....(example) This debate isn't about morals or character,it is about the drug testing/negotiations. Do you understand why it is important to stick to the topic???? i'm actually sticking to the topic. i answered all your questions regarding the negotiations didn't i? but sure. so you won't be bothered, please consider the other topic in question dropped.

what sucks is dealing with the huge contradictions that your man-god seems to create everytime he opens his mouth.. which leave you guys with the problem of how to twist 'facts' just to defend these contradictions.. have a good day.. and maybe next time, you'd be fair whenever you rode on your OST high horse again and call all boxers and not focus your fscking hatred on one man.. fscking hippos.. and yeah.. good day again!..

why are you so bothered that i mentioned the floyd camp making contradictory and racist statements? if you think his statements weren't racist, then that's your problem, not mine. its team Pac/floyd. Not bothered at all. What we are talking about is the drug testing and negotiations,not personalities and character flaws.We could be here all day if you wanna talk about guys who claim to be with god while cheating on their wife and knocking up whores....(example) This debate isn't about morals or character,it is about the drug testing/negotiations. Do you understand why it is important to stick to the topic????

so it's true.. you really are afflicted with that 'selective reading' syndrome.. there have been countless articles saying that pac tried to get floyd out of his vacation by agreeing to his testing request, thinking that it's the only hindrance for the fight not happening.. now you are saying pac never seeks for a floyd fight.. holy sh|t.. what the fsck is these articles about if not seeking for a fight against floyd.. Waiting for an answer still about the weight penalty.....I have a feeling I may be waiting a while-lol. With Manny agreeing to drug testing-I will believe it when I see it.I can afford to be a skeptic when Pac's team has flip flopped and lied on this subject.It must suck to be in the position of having to justify Pac's reaction to drug testing.Have a nice night!

Who is talking about racism? Why bring it up when it is the OST/negotiations we are debating??? why are you so bothered that i mentioned the floyd camp making contradictory and racist statements? if you think his statements weren't racist, then that's your problem, not mine. When it comes to drug testing (the topic at hand),there is only one team with contradictions-tell me who it is. its team Pac/floyd.

I don't view Floyd as a god...don't confuse the way I view a fighter as the way YOU view them. Manny has had several fights lined up without even negotiating or seeking a Floyd fight.You must have forgotten his Margarito shot that happened while they were "negotiating" a second time-remember,the one where Arum wasn't at! lmao so it's true.. you really are afflicted with that 'selective reading' syndrome.. there have been countless articles saying that pac tried to get floyd out of his vacation by agreeing to his testing request, thinking that it's the only hindrance for the fight not happening.. now you are saying pac never seeks for a floyd fight.. holy sh|t.. what the fsck is these articles talking about if not seeking for a fight against floyd..

Floyd showed the contract on his live stream. Why wasn't Manny's signature on it???? Weird for a guy who you claim agrees to drug testing. BTW-do you think everyone should give up 10,000,000 dollars per pound over the weight limit? Just curious,because Manny has come over weight in the past-weird that he would try to assert this in a contract with Floyd.:buttkick: oh really.. why not post pics of it here.. make if readable please.. although yes, its valid if any reputable boxing site wrote an article of it with every dotted i's and crossed t's is written in the article.. a picture of the signature would be awesome too.. i'd like to see where floyd signature have been and where pac have supposedly not signed.. but please, none of that floydhype.com site please.. then i'll shut my trap.. or else it's just chalk it up to your never ending delusion when it comes to everything that floyd says..

usada.. holy sh|t.. that fscking floyd attack dog when he first started this OST crusade? and what the hell? you're saying that it's not right for pac to try to coax out floyd from hiding when he's on vacation.. then where the hell was he before he fights ortiz? not in vacation anymore? really the your and your man-god's contradiction is staggering.. and your god only comes out AFTER pac have signed another fight.. and talk trash left and right about pac.. I don't view Floyd as a god...don't confuse the way I view a fighter as the way YOU view them. Manny has had several fights lined up without even negotiating or seeking a Floyd fight.You must have forgotten his Margarito shot that happened while they were "negotiating" a second time-remember,the one where Arum wasn't at! lmao

Like I said (thanks for proving my point), IMO Manny "agrees" to randomized testing WHILE FLOYD IS AWAY from the sport.When Floyd gets an opponent and returns to the sport,then Pac has an issue with USADA-sounds like posturing to me. Who is putting up the roadblocks when it comes to submitting to random drug testing? In fact, since Floyd has come back to boxing recently,when has Pac started to agree to random testing? Now the only thing you hear is Ariza saying they won't do the tests and say the fight is to be on Manny's terms.Are you sure it isn't YOU who has selective hearing???? usada.. holy sh|t.. that fscking floyd attack dog when he first started this OST crusade? and what the hell? you're saying that it's not right for pac to try to coax out floyd from hiding when he's on vacation.. then where the hell was he before he fights ortiz? not in vacation anymore? really the your and your man-god's contradiction is staggering.. and your god only comes out AFTER pac have signed another fight.. and talk trash left and right about pac..

you may ignore the racist statements on floyd's camp, but it doesn't mean it isn't there. (in fairness though, floyd sr, roger and floyd jr did help a number of filipino pugilists. just forgot what article it was.) and as i said before which you ignored as well, contradictions are coming from BOTH camps. if you can't see that, then you're simply biased. Who is talking about racism? Why bring it up when it is the OST/negotiations we are debating??? When it comes to drug testing (the topic at hand),there is only one team with contradictions-tell me who it is.

holy fsck.. :pat: i can't believe your delusion.. you really, actually believe that there's a contract.. oh my god.. hey.. let's go by with the timeless flomo reasoning.. 'oh please.. show me the contract of which floyd is talking about and i'd shut my trap'.. Floyd showed the contract on his live stream. Why wasn't Manny's signature on it???? Weird for a guy who you claim agrees to drug testing. BTW-do you think everyone should give up 10,000,000 dollars per pound over the weight limit? Just curious,because Manny has come over weight in the past-weird that he would try to assert this in a contract with Floyd.:buttkick:

We aren't talking about Racism,we are talking about the contradictions of team Pac and OST,and it is coming from one side.Weird. you may ignore the racist statements on floyd's camp, but it doesn't mean it isn't there. (in fairness though, floyd sr, roger and floyd jr did help a number of filipino pugilists. just forgot what article it was.) and as i said before which you ignored as well, contradictions are coming from BOTH camps. if you can't see that, then you're simply biased.