Did Floyd’s performance last night seals and gives him the #1 P4P slot?
There were a lot of questions of last night bout between Floyd and Ortiz. Most boxing fans think that both fighters fought a dirty match. Anyways, based on the match-up/outcome last night do you think Floyd’s performance made him the #1 P4P fighter?
Poll coming up…
No version of Ali wouldve beat any version of Frazier in 2 rounds like Foreman did....
So you are agreeing with me that Foremans win over Frasier is better than Alis win?
wow. Truer words have never been spoken in relation.
Exactly, Pacs win over Hatton is better than Floyds. Its quite possible that the hatton that fought Pac was better than the one who fought Floyd.
Floyd cant beg, borrow and try steal credit on a tecnicality all the time. You dont get Carl Thompson fans saying Carls win over David Haye is better than Wlads win over Haye, just because Carl beat Haye first do you. But with Floyd it is the only way Floyd can get any credit because he fails to deliver in the ring.
off of lastnight performance Floyd proofed he is still with out a question the best fighter in the world in different level of Pacquiao and Martinez but based on how the fight ended NO he shouldn't be #1 P4P
Hell no... Not a chance dog.
Did Floyd’s performance last night seals and gives him the #1 P4P slot?
There were a lot of questions of last night bout between Floyd and Ortiz. Most boxing fans think that both fighters fought a dirty match. Anyways, based on the match-up/outcome last night do you think Floyd’s performance made him the #1 P4P fighter?
Poll coming up…
Manny is #1......... Floyd is #2.,.......... Pac-man has come all the way from flyweight, EVEN If Mayweather beats Manny up,...... Manny comes out on top.... I tell you that Floyd is in a no-win situation..... Floyd is a real WW...... Pacquiao is at best a FW.... end of story......... I hope they fight but.
No version of Ali wouldve beat any version of Frazier in 2 rounds like Foreman did....
Uh Oh! Pac d1ck riders (aka the Fudge PACkers) will ignore this one! lol
not really, it only adds up to his claim AND imho only way to for Floyd to take the No. 1 spot is if Pac losses more so if he is the one to beat manny...
You cant have claim to be no1 when a littler guy in pac beat hattton in 2 rounds and DLH in 7.
No version of FLoyd would beat any version of Hatton, or DLH in 2 and 7 rounds respectively. He hasnt to this day beat anyone of the calibre of Barrera, Morales, Cotto etc.
Just no way he is p4p no1 on his body of work. No one with a reputation as a ducker and someone with a reluctance to fight can be considered no1.
No version of Ali wouldve beat any version of Frazier in 2 rounds like Foreman did....
i do and and take it into consideration. It is subjective if the version of hatton that fought floyd or pac was the better hatton, it cant be proved either way. What isnt subjective is who beat hatton better and should get more credit. If floyd rematched hatton he wouldnt beat him in 2 rounds. If pac fought the hatton that floyd fought it is unlikely hatton would go much more than 2 rounds with pac.
Anyway you look at it, pac deserves more credit and floyd cant be begging, borrowing and stealing credit on a tecnicality all the time.
hatton, undefeated. May win. Hatton broken. Pac win. Delahoya 154 champion. May win. Delahoya 147 10 years out. Pac win. Mosley legit 147 ring champ. May win. Mosley lost 2 fights. Pac win. Future prediction. Ortiz young champ. May win. Ortiz 147 1 loss. Pac win.
you have no uderstanding of where these fighters are career wise when pac beats em compared to when floyd beats em do you?
I do and and take it into consideration. It is subjective if the version of Hatton that fought FLoyd or Pac was the better hatton, it cant be proved either way. What isnt subjective is who beat Hatton better and should get more credit. If FLoyd rematched hatton he wouldnt beat him in 2 rounds. If Pac fought the hatton that Floyd fought it is unlikely Hatton would go much more than 2 rounds with Pac.
Anyway you look at it, Pac deserves more credit and Floyd cant be begging, borrowing and stealing credit on a tecnicality all the time.
you cant have claim to be no1 when a littler guy in pac beat hattton in 2 rounds and dlh in 7.
No version of floyd would beat any version of hatton, or dlh in 2 and 7 rounds respectively.
you have no uderstanding of where these fighters are career wise when pac beats em compared to when floyd beats em do you?
No, but his career and skill in and of itself automatically gains him the #2 spot without question. the only reason he was even taken off was becuz he was inactive, but that's changed...
So, easily #2 and right back on Pac's heels for #1
You cant have claim to be no1 when a littler guy in pac beat hattton in 2 rounds and DLH in 7.
No version of FLoyd would beat any version of Hatton, or DLH in 2 and 7 rounds respectively. He hasnt to this day beat anyone of the calibre of Barrera, Morales, Cotto etc.
Just no way he is p4p no1 on his body of work. No one with a reputation as a ducker and someone with a reluctance to fight can be considered no1.
No, he hasnt shown he is no1 p4p in the world. In 4 rounds work and a sucker punch you prove nothing.
He will prove he is the no1 when he acts like the no1 and fights the best fighters. Him beating Ortiz is no more special than BH beating someone as limited as Pascal.
Beat Sergio Martinez or Pac and you have claim to be the best, there is no other way.