PBF sure impressed the DA and the Judge with his 24/7

The entire Mayweather clan are so self-incriminating it beggars belief. Those teams of lawyers must think of Floyd as "easy work".

So your saying if I wanted to bring videos of someone to show their common behavior to prove a point that their what they being accused of that I can't do that? Highly doubt it. Not saying 247 will be the goldmine to kill Floyd in court, but when people can be accused in court with evidence in twitter and faceook nowadays , I doubt TV where It shows you personally doing a act can't be used at all. I just don't buy that bull. no u cant. that goes against every tenant of our legal system and it is highly prejudicial. like i said, if u dont believe me, walk up to a lawyer and ask them if this is the case. i guarantee u they'll laugh and tell u it doesnt work that way. i mean a simple episode of law and order would dis spell all of these silly notions of yours. and u can be accused using evidence from twitter and facebook, but it cannot just purely be character evidence. it must either be related to the crime at hand or it must serve some other purpose such as motive, identity etc. it cannot be used to show that a defendant has a character or reputation for behaving badly. it just doesnt work that way.

From the novel I read. The defense would have to introduce character evidence which they wouldn't do simply because it would open up a can of worms. I'm no lawyer but thats my perception.

are u kidding me?? smh...i dont kno why i waste my time with u simple minded fools. a da could never ever introduce evidence of character unless floyd's lawyer did so first. the problem is, no lawyer in his right mind introduces character evidence first. u wanna ask how the **** i kno??? because im a frikkin jd who took the bar about a month ago and ive worked in the legal field for the last 5 yrs. now if u wld plz stfu and stop acting like u know wtf ur talking about, itd be greatly appreciated.lol owned. lol

thats not at all what im talking about genius. what ppl see on tv is what ppl see on tv. the point is it cannot be used by a prosecutor nor a judge in the court room. finally, i doubt u know what ur talking about. the first thing any lawyer does when picking jurors is make sure that the potential juror has little to no knowledge about programs such as 24/7. its not that hard to do. most ppl in america have no idea who floyd mayweather is. So your saying if I wanted to bring videos of someone to show their common behavior to prove a point that their what they being accused of that I can't do that? Highly doubt it. Not saying 247 will be the goldmine to kill Floyd in court, but when people can be accused in court with evidence in twitter and faceook nowadays , I doubt TV where It shows you personally doing a act can't be used at all. I just don't buy that bull.

I highly doubt Dempsey is even close to something concerning law. Cause he'd clearly know acts like Mayweather have been used againest countless people in court. Its not "evidence" but its mostly to persuave the jury which mostly works. To say how Mayweather acts on camera or off can't be used againest him defys anyones common sense. How you conduct yourself especially If people are sueing you cause of suppose violent actions goes a long way, in court to. Americas corrupt as it is "fair". Don't forget that. thats not at all what im talking about genius. what ppl see on tv is what ppl see on tv. the point is it cannot be used by a prosecutor nor a judge in the court room. finally, i doubt u know what ur talking about. the first thing any lawyer does when picking jurors is make sure that the potential juror has little to no knowledge about programs such as 24/7. its not that hard to do. most ppl in america have no idea who floyd mayweather is.

I highly doubt Dempsey is even close to something concerning law. Cause he'd clearly know acts like Mayweather have been used againest countless people in court. Its not "evidence" but its mostly to persuave the jury which mostly works. To say how Mayweather acts on camera or off can't be used againest him defys anyones common sense. How you conduct yourself especially If people are sueing you cause of suppose violent actions goes a long way, in court to. Americas corrupt as it is "fair". Don't forget that.

but you do understand...........why you get criticize on this forum..........then? for claiming to be a lawyer and not having the sh1t to back it up?........nothing personal hommie................ ok, i suggest u go thru the forum and find a post where i wondered or cared about the criticism? idc if u dont believe me. ive stated that countless times. what i said was fact, i know it. if u dont thats absolutely fine. oh and this is absolutely irrelevant to the topic at hand. i stand by everything i stated. if u dont believe what i said about character evidence, then go look it up. EDIT:BTW wat happened to your last account STRuGG?

So a rappers lyrics can be used,but not you losing your temper on camera in front of millions??damn flomos are dumb you are one big idiot..the thing with using a cd in court is ..it can only be used against them when they rap about the crime they committed ..but you being retarded wouldn't understand that. so they could also use the video after the ortiz fight and use it against him after he whoops ortiz ??? should they use that as evidence too???

So we can take you seriously .....when you're not in a boxing forum then......because you're a better speaker/poster in real life? right? this isnt real life, this is the internet. u shouldn't treat it as such. maybe thats whats wrong with the world today. i can separate the two quite well. so when someone hurls an insult at me or discredits me based on my grammar, etc. it means nothing. i know where i come from and what ive achieved. so none of that means anything.

:lol1: You're a comedian. Anything you say/do online or in videos, infront of witnesses can be used against you in a court of law: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37986320/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/facebook-divorce-lawyers-new-best-friend/ http://www.newson6.com/story/9861833/can-what-you-post-online-be-used-against-you-in-court?redirected=true http://blackbookcv.ning.com/profiles/blogs/can-facebook-photos-be-used If you make a video saying, Oh i hate cops I wish they were never alive, bla bla bla. and if you are a suspect in a cop murder, guess WHAT?? They gonna play that tape to show the court. Or do you think he can just say "i wuz joking" Its like guys getting arrested for posing with guns on their facebook, could it be a fake gun? Yes, Could it be photoshopped? Yes. You still getting booked. and that has absolutely nothing to do with character evidence. are u retarded?

grammar dont mean sh1t.............in the practice of law?.................seriously:nonono::nonono: im talking about here fool. i dont get graded on what i type in a message forum. its not difficult to understand. the way i speak in school and the way i speak when im with my friends is also very different. i grew up in the bronx, ny and i have an accent. but i was also taught to speak american standard english as well. so i can shift very easily. get my drift? theres a time and a place for everything.

are u kidding me?? smh...i dont kno why i waste my time with u simple minded fools. a da could never ever introduce evidence of character unless floyd's lawyer did so first. the problem is, no lawyer in his right mind introduces character evidence first. u wanna ask how the **** i kno??? because im a frikkin jd who took the bar about a month ago and ive worked in the legal field for the last 5 yrs. now if u wld plz stfu and stop acting like u know wtf ur talking about, itd be greatly appreciated. I looked it up and yes sir you are correct about the introduction of character evidence. I stand corrected and you owe me an apology for reading so much I now have a headache !!! :rofl:

****, i dont like my chances on the bar either. i took it a month ago, worst experience of my life hardest test ive ever taken and ive been in school sine the agre of 2. but once again, that has zero to do with my point. if what i said was wrong, im open for someone to offer some proof otherwise. :lol1: You're a comedian. Anything you say/do online or in videos, infront of witnesses can be used against you in a court of law: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37986320/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/facebook-divorce-lawyers-new-best-friend/ http://www.newson6.com/story/9861833/can-what-you-post-online-be-used-against-you-in-court?redirected=true http://blackbookcv.ning.com/profiles/blogs/can-facebook-photos-be-used If you make a video saying, Oh i hate cops I wish they were never alive, bla bla bla. and if you are a suspect in a cop murder, guess WHAT?? They gonna play that tape to show the court. Or do you think he can just say "i wuz joking" Its like guys getting arrested for posing with guns on their facebook, could it be a fake gun? Yes, Could it be photoshopped? Yes. You still getting booked.

irregardless Used by people who ignorantly mean to say regardless. According to webster, it is a word, but since the prefix "ir" and the suffx "less" both mean "not or with" they cancel each other out, so what you end up with is regard. When you use this to try to say you don't care about something, you end up saying that you do. Of course everyone knows what you mean to say and only a pompous,rude ******* will correct you.:nonono: ok and??? im not an english major. this has nothing to do with anything i said. if u guys are gonna attack my grammar, spelling, phonetics etc. then have at it. i dont ge graded on it.

Ah, someone else besides me points out the obvious. Never brag about your "credentials" if you type like a 10 year old on AOL's Instant Messenger. i didnt brag. i stated the truth. whats there to brag about. im not lying, i didnt say anything about being a great lawyer. but i do have a jd and i did take the bar last month. those are truths whether u want to believe them or not.

i dont like our chances in the bar............................:nonono: ****, i dont like my chances on the bar either. i took it a month ago, worst experience of my life hardest test ive ever taken and ive been in school sine the agre of 2. but once again, that has zero to do with my point. if what i said was wrong, im open for someone to offer some proof otherwise.

Being a prison lawyer doesn't mean being in the law field. You type like a complete illiterate retard, you don't even have a high school diploma. ANYONE who actually went to high school doesn't type the way you do. Hell, even a grade 7 English student types better and has better grammar than you. Do you wash the bathrooms in the law office? Or when you were in jail you pretended to be a lawyer so people could hook your broke ass up with some canteen? whatever u say man...ur insults dont really bother me. either u prove what i say wrong or u shut up and go on one of ur racist rants elsewhere.

And you still manage to butcher the English language like this? Have you no consideration for the reader when you type these badly structured paragraphs? i dont really care to type otherwise because im using my phone. irregardles, this is a forum site. im not getting judged based on my spelling, grammar nor punctuation. my goal is to get my point across as fast as possible and it works for the most part.

honestly idc whether u believe me or not. doesnt make a difference. im not on here as a lawyer, as a jd nor as a candidate for the bar. thats my personal life. i come on here to talk boxing and if ppl are saying things that are highly inaccurate, which they are, then ill say otherwise. like i said, if anything i said is wrong, then i suggest someone either pick up a criminal procedure text book prove it, or get a lawyer prove it, **** do a basic google search and see if a prosecutor can admit character evidence in his own. Wasting your time man. Some people you are arguing with have likely never even been to america, cant expect them to understand the legal system...