There are Tards on this board who swore by Calderon, constantly bringing him up to "prove" "flomos" dont know what "pure boxing" is. Now that he's lost to Segura and stated Floyd beats Pac, they no longer use him as their little anti Floyd the best boxer reference.
True, but it has a lot to do about where he stands. That's where the irony comes in.
Calderon as a pure boxer who lost to Segura says a bit, credibility wise.
what does it say?
who are you to question his credibility in the sport?
True, but it has a lot to do about where he stands. That's where the irony comes in.
Calderon as a pure boxer who lost to Segura says a bit, credibility wise.
Bull****. Not comparable.
If Calderon had been blessed with Floyd's power (which seems to be underrated here - he has decent pop, enough to stun people and make them think and stop throwing...) he would probably still be champ or not have been KO'd in his fights with Segura. He's a powder-puff who relied on his agility and above average boxing acumen. Floyd has all that and more and decent power.
Anyone else notice how all the actual fighters say Mayweather beats Pacquiao yet the so called experts and biased media insist on riding Pac's nuts?
Bit of a generalisation that isnt it, when they did predicitions for Haye-Klitschko in the Ring the only people who picked Haye were active fighters, all the experts picked Wlad. Think it can go both ways, there's plenty of experts who pick Floyd over Pac (Bill Detloff for one I know).
Anyone else notice how all the actual fighters say Mayweather beats Pacquiao yet the so called experts and biased media insist on riding Pac's nuts?
I see most of the media saying that Floyd will win.
Didn't Calderon just get his ass beaten down by a pressure fighter...hm...
a pressure fighter who knows how to cut the ring.....pacquiao mmmm well his jabs sucks LOL