You all know that Dwyer guy from YT, and his Gambler's Advisor sh*t predictions (although I was impressed with his Pirog/Jacobs prediction one time because he actually got the KO and the round prediction right).
Well not only did he pick Gayevid as a 50/50 fight, he also picked Green to beat Tarver by KO, then in the post-fight thread, after admitting how wrong his was, he now says that he gives both Tarver and Hopkins chances to trouble the Klitschkos. LOL!!!!
Tarver? Ok, first you pick against him with Green, now you are saying cause he beat Green he can beat the Klitschkos?!?
Hopkins? WTF?!?
Listen to his analysis, the most retarded analysis I have ever heard. He said that just because Hopkins beat Pavlik, he has a chance to get "inside on Wlad" cause "Wlad can't fight inside". LOL! He is actually comparing Pavlik and Wlad.... other than skin color, they have NOTHING in common.
I know he is a Klitschko hater and all, and I know he has the race glasses on, but seriously? He is going to pick two 40 year olds, non-HWs, not even CWs, to beat an ATG HOF HW, who is the one of the most tecnically gifted and also happens to be one of the most powerful HW ever?
Tarver needs to stay the hell away from the heavyweight division. A fat cab-driver could walk through his punches and beat him. He should just fight at cruiser-weight.
He actually should retire and thank his lucky stars that he had a strong helping of good fortune, and also whilst he still has his senses. 42 is no age to be trying to win titles, it's time to be counting your money, and figuring where to invest it.........
Ooooooh, Shnitzzle!!
"When did I ever say I was The Gambling Psychic, B!tch!?
How 'bout I take a gamble and whoop yo ass with a prediction
and put it on YouTube? I bank more bling, than you'lll ever
see in yo life, B!tch!! Bring it!!"
http://www.google.com/url?source=imgres&ct=img&q=http://i51.tinypic.com/20gb715.jpg&sa=X&ei=qnIzTueODqvC0AGzmtyYDA&ved=0CAQQ8wc&usg=AFQjCNFwd1ILz695MgLU1yfiLxkb9NVqyw
I think I rest my case... Dwyer is an idiot, the only guy defending Dwyer is probably Dwyer himself. I cannot think of two people in the world that think that Hopkins, Toney, and Tarver can beat Wlad. I think all but one poster on this thread agree.
Perhaps the poster is Dwyer himself, and his avatar wearing a mask is his oblique way of telling everyone that if his face were to be seen, it would be recognised.........
But...if this poster is indeed Dwyer, impossible as it may be, it is not any more impossible that the opinions this poster has been producing. If sanity were measured by posts on this subject, the masked poster would be philosophically cmntemplating...no,no, not his navel....but 4 white, padded walls.
Yes, most certainly an idiot.
Just one little thing. If you are going to insist on embellishing your posts with a permanent quotation-the one from Robespierre- at least let it be a GENUINE one, and please...spell his name properly.
I suppose it is meant to be a joke, feeble enough as it is, since it was well known by Robespierre's contemporaries-those who were courageous enough to voice an opinion- that Robespierre had absolutely NO sense of humour.
I like it however.
I'be been reading all these posts from the last one to the first, and have reached this page. I was thinking all the time that you had been just joking, but this post of yours sounds as if you are actally serious. NO you cannot be. If you are there is a serious deficiency in your boxing sense somewhere.
And I do not mean to be rude but constructive. Seek help.
Name 5 reasons why you think Wlad would beat Tarver. Tarver has more power than Wlad, has a better jab, and hes African American so he's way more slick.
KLTP;10917072']I'm still waiting for the 5 good reasons. Why YOU think Wladimir would beat both of them.
I'be been reading all these posts from the last one to the first, and have reached this page. I was thinking all the time that you had been just joking, but this post of yours sounds as if you are actally serious. NO you cannot be. If you are there is a serious deficiency in your boxing sense somewhere.
And I do not mean to be rude but constructive. Seek help.
KLTP;10916690']How would you know? Wladimir hasn't fought anyone that made me think "Oh man he can beat Toney, and Tarver!" the only one close was a way past his prime Rahman. Until Wlad fights someone like Toney, or Tarver we'll never know. I don't consider his win over the great Samuel Peter to prove anything at all really.
I think Toney and Tarver would beat most of the HWs on Wlad's resume.
Am I still an idiot?
i really hate to say it as it is actually rude....but you asked....YES.
His pre and post Wlad-Haye videos are something to behold. He compares Haye to some of the greatest people throughout history (Gandhi included...somehow) and then in the post fight he blames the entire fight on Wlad, and then *****es about being bitter. I admit, I watch his videos. But I went from watching to hear a guy who used to be right break down fights, to now wanting to hear the Black version of Teddy Atlas spend 15 minutes calling a fight totally wrong in his breakdown. He cant even pick the obvious ones these days. His newest video calls for Ortiz to outbox Floyd if he expects to win. Seriously...
Lol, I gotta see that.
And yea Dwyer is too dumb to even describe.
His pre and post Wlad-Haye videos are something to behold. He compares Haye to some of the greatest people throughout history (Gandhi included...somehow) and then in the post fight he blames the entire fight on Wlad, and then *****es about being bitter. I admit, I watch his videos. But I went from watching to hear a guy who used to be right break down fights, to now wanting to hear the Black version of Teddy Atlas spend 15 minutes calling a fight totally wrong in his breakdown. He cant even pick the obvious ones these days. His newest video calls for Ortiz to outbox Floyd if he expects to win. Seriously...
KLTP;10917524']Where are your 5 reasons? Avoiding the subject. Tarver and Toney are in there primes, and they would destroy Wlad. Tarver has that Mike Tyson killer instinct. Did you not see the Roy Jones KO?
:lol1:
I see what you're doing. Unfortunately he's to thick to realise.
LOL now I know you are crazy....
So when Toney was getting out-boxed by Peter or getting an SD over Batchedler while on steroids, he wasn't in his prime right? He is just coming into his prime now... his best moments are still to come right? LOL... I can't wait for 60 year old Shamrock to hump him to death while Toney is begging for mercy...
Tarver? Well you are right, no one can strive higher than beating Danny Green, a CW phenow the likes of which the world has never seen (never mind that he most at SMW most of his career). Tarver better stick to B level CWs and LHWs cause even a guy like Arreola will kill him.
Let me know when either one beats a legit HW in the top 20, until then keep dreaming. That's the only way you can still not slit your wrists seeing the K bros ruling the HW division, is by living in a fantasy world where you keep telling yourself "Tarver, Hopkins, and Toney can all beat the Klitschkos, the Klitschkos are just scared of them..."
Where are your 5 reasons? Avoiding the subject. Tarver and Toney are in there primes, and they would destroy Wlad. Tarver has that Mike Tyson killer instinct. Did you not see the Roy Jones KO?
Bigger problem I have with him is that he usually doesn't admit he was wrong with his picks no matter how the fight turns out. He said McCloskey would have come back to beat Khan. He said PW beat Lara.
He also cites the Pac-Hatton fight as an example of how to beat Pac. He's just like any fanboy. The more he likes or dislikes a fighter, the less objective he is.
I think I rest my case... Dwyer is an idiot, the only guy defending Dwyer is probably Dwyer himself. I cannot think of two people in the world that think that Hopkins, Toney, and Tarver can beat Wlad. I think all but one poster on this thread agree.
KLTP;10917104']Toney and Tarver are FAR from being washed up. Both of them are in there primes.
KLTP;10916690']How would you know? Wladimir hasn't fought anyone that made me think "Oh man he can beat Toney, and Tarver!" the only one close was a way past his prime Rahman. Until Wlad fights someone like Toney, or Tarver we'll never know. I don't consider his win over the great Samuel Peter to prove anything at all really.
I think Toney and Tarver would beat most of the HWs on Wlad's resume.
Am I still an idiot?
Yes, most certainly an idiot.
KLTP;10917104']Toney and Tarver are FAR from being washed up. Both of them are in there primes.
LOL now I know you are crazy....
So when Toney was getting out-boxed by Peter or getting an SD over Batchedler while on steroids, he wasn't in his prime right? He is just coming into his prime now... his best moments are still to come right? LOL... I can't wait for 60 year old Shamrock to hump him to death while Toney is begging for mercy...
Tarver? Well you are right, no one can strive higher than beating Danny Green, a CW phenow the likes of which the world has never seen (never mind that he most at SMW most of his career). Tarver better stick to B level CWs and LHWs cause even a guy like Arreola will kill him.
Let me know when either one beats a legit HW in the top 20, until then keep dreaming. That's the only way you can still not slit your wrists seeing the K bros ruling the HW division, is by living in a fantasy world where you keep telling yourself "Tarver, Hopkins, and Toney can all beat the Klitschkos, the Klitschkos are just scared of them..."
KLTP;10917104']Toney and Tarver are FAR from being washed up. Both of them are in there primes.
Na come on KLTP, I enjoy reading your posts but it's obvious that Wladimir will beat both Tarver and Toney, and I'm not even a fully-fledged Klit-licker, I like Wlad but his fans can be retarded
If he did, you would complain that he is beating up on old, fat, washed-up, middle weights, instead Wlad fights undefeated world champs in their prime.
Toney and Tarver are FAR from being washed up. Both of them are in there primes.