Naseem Hamed vs Hector Camcho at featherweight who wins?

I can see either fighter wining, Hamed by KO or Camacho by UD. Hamed, even though he was a massive puncher had no chance of KO'ing Camacho. None of the guys he'd KO'd had chins anything like Camacho's. To the best of my knowledge he has never even been KO'd, KD'd or even staggered. (I could be corrected on the two last) Although he may be retired by now, I haven't heard so, and for the past few years has had only about a fight a year or even less, probably to pick up some loose change. He may have had, by now, close to a hundred fights and has taken practically NO damage. He has a brillian boxing brain, and ever since I saw him fight Ien Sigurani 14-15 years ago, I noticed that he does just enough to win. I can visualise him counting every punch in his mind.

Who wins the showdown between the "Prince" and "Macho" Camacho? I don't recall that Camacho was ever a featherweight, I firmly believe that he began as a 130 pounder. That was when I saw and heard of him first. And all everyone could talk about was his blazing, unnatural speed, never before ever seen, and his energy and activity, not to mention that he, whenever he wanted to was a fierce puncher. Anyway assuming this fight could happen, it would be Camacho hands down, no contest, the best of his weight I have ever seen.

I got Camacho by decision.

I can see either fighter wining, Hamed by KO or Camacho by UD.

Camacho, much better fighter who fought much better opposition. People hate on Camacho because of his mouth but dude was lightning fast and could barely be touched the way Naz was against Barrera.

I got Camacho, unlike Naz Hector followed up his shots with combinations!