I"d watch it if they put it on the Hopkins-Dawson undercard..... actually, if they throw it under cotto-margs, I'll buy that one, I"m buying Bhop anyway.
I didnt pay the first time as I watched it in a bar and would do the same again but If Im asked if its worth PPV then I'd say it probably is yeah. When you look at what other rubbish is being charged for ( Khan , Mcloskey ) ( Hatton, Lazcano ) I think our best heavyweight vs one of the all time greats in a grudge rematch probably justifies a PPV charge.
I dont think many would agree with that after the farce of the 1st fight but it was a commercial success and sky couldnt cope with the demand. Therefore it makes sense to do it again. The British public have paid for lesser fights so in that aspect I expect it to sell again
I don't have the opportunity, impossible to buy any PPVs over here. It's either free on TV (like the first fight) or I'll have to catch a stream.
But, I'd be more psyched for this fight then most other fights, that's for sure. Would rather pay for Wlad-Haye II then Hopkins-Dawson for example.
If there was a rematch would you pay for the PPV?
Lol, I wouldn't have paid for the first snooze fest. If they fought again and somebody wanted me to watch it I'd demand they pay ME!!
14y ago
Would you pay for a Haye Klitschko rematch PPV? | BoxingScene Community