What has Tim Bradley ever done?

all of the fighters at 140 are EXTREMELY OVERRATED...besides Timothy Bradley...WHY? Because Bradley never received the HYPE like Khan, Alexander or Ortiz (when he was fighting at 140) Bradley didn't win his title in a Vacant Match against a BUM like Alexander did by fighting DEMARCUS CORLEY? or Like Amir Khan did by fighting Oisin Fagan? LOL so if you want to talk OVERRATED, your talking about the WRONG GUY, Khan IS EASILY more OVERRATED THEN BRADLEY Khan Hype is for his POTENTIAL, really not based on what he has done IN THE RING so far, same for Alexander HYPE, it was because of his POTENTIAL (he was getting comparisons to Mayweather by guys like Dan Rafael back in 2009) if anything, Bradley might actually still be the most UNDERRATED FIGHTER at 140 because he don't get the Promotional Backing Or The HYPE that the others get despite the fact that he is rated #1 by most at 140 and he is Top 10 P4P So to answer your question "WHAT HAS TIMOTHY BRADLEY EVER DONE?"... He worked his way up the OLD FASHION WHY by WINNING IN THE RING! compared to the other guys who are all AGAIN...being HYPED for their POTENTIAL, Most of them was basically HANDED titles and put in a BS Vacant Bout setup by their Promoters just so their Promoter can marketed them as "CHAMPIONS" compared to Bradley who went INTO THE UK AND TOOK HIS FIRST MAJOR TITLE from Junior Witter, Next Title...he BEAT KENDALL HOLT, I can honestly say so far in Bradley's Career, NOBODY HAVEN'T HANDED HIM ANYTHING...I honestly can't say the same for the OTHERS! OH and by the way...Bradley didn't get his a$$ KO'D BY A LESSER TALENTED FIGHTER either NOR did he ever QUIT DURING A FIGHT...JUST SAYING! Not even that big of a Bradley fan but as a Hardcore Boxing Fan...I HAVE TO CALL IT LIKE I SEE IT AND I DON'T GIVE A FUK WHO DON'T LIKE IT" EXCELENT POST MAN!!! http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1269/1085754525_88f695837e.jpg Bradley is highly underrated and he has excellent boxing skills....I don't know what the heck these haters are talking about. Bradley is just sitting back like ....... http://tilatequilaomg.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/tila_haters.jpg :boxing:

What the hell has Marcos Maidana done to even remain relevant? Fought competitive fights against both Khan and Kotelnik. Smashed Ortiz. Does Kendall Holt still box? I heard Junior Witter is entering Prizefighter aka Bumfighter. :lol1:

bradleys last 5 opponents > khans last 5 opponents this really isnt even a debate Kotelnik, Paulie, Maidana, Judah are as good if not better than Holt, Witter, Petersen and Alexander

My thoughts exactly....:lol1: bradleys last 5 opponents > khans last 5 opponents this really isnt even a debate

Bradley beat a shot to sh*t Witter, who already lost to Kotelnik. Witter was never an A-class fighter to begin with. Prime Witter loses to prime Hatton, prime Cotto and prime Tszyu. Prime Witter already lost to Judah and Kotelnik. So if Judah and Kotelnik were able to beat prime Witter, what makes Bradley's victory over past prime Witter so good? :thinking: Because he went to the UK and did it. That's impressive for a fighter in his first world championship fight. And don't pretend Witter was a bum, he beat good fighters, if no one THAT good. Certainly wasn't the best in the division though.

I think he has done well at 140, but he really shouldn't have ducked Khan like he did. He shouldn't be in the run for a Pacquiao or possible Mayweather fight if he won't even fight Khan. He should have taken that date in July to fight Khan, and if he won then he could talk about fighting Pac or Mayweather.

http://www.tinygif.com/data/media/13/markey_mark_wtf.gif My thoughts exactly....:lol1:

I said to be num 1 you have to beat num 1,not you become num 1 when you beat num 1 get it right fool..Bradley beat a num 1 fighter and is now num 1 nobody is backtracking..You are making things up as you go along.. Khan has to beat Bradley to become num 1 dude plain and simple..If Bradley was ranked at 4 or 3 at the time he beat Witteer he would have been the num 1 Jr WW but he was not,he was ranked like 10(if even ranked at all)Khan is num 2 and Bradley just beat(imo)the num 3 Jr WW in the World noway does Khan become num 1 by beating the num 6 ranked fight in the Div..Unless Bradley is massively inactive.. If Khan has a better resume then yes he does become number one. Bradley ahsnt had a defining fight yet to make his untouchable at the top LWW, their resumes are close enough as it is. If Khan beats Judah, hes no.1 in the division its that simple mate Accept it

You said you become the no1 when you beat the no1.....that turned out to be false. Stop backtracking. Khan doesnt have to beat Bradley. Bradley is not "the man". All Khan has to do is have as good as or better resume, better performances and be a more skilled fighter. And hes well on his way to doing that. Fuk Bradley. I said to be num 1 you have to beat num 1,not you become num 1 when you beat num 1 get it right fool..Bradley beat a num 1 fighter and is now num 1 nobody is backtracking..You are making things up as you go along.. Khan has to beat Bradley to become num 1 dude plain and simple..If Bradley was ranked at 4 or 3 at the time he beat Witteer he would have been the num 1 Jr WW but he was not,he was ranked like 10(if even ranked at all)Khan is num 2 and Bradley just beat(imo)the num 3 Jr WW in the World noway does Khan become num 1 by beating the num 6 ranked fight in the Div..Unless Bradley is massively inactive..

The worse type of fans are fans who are SO BIASED TO "THEIR OWN" that they can't even give OTHER FIGHTERS CREDIT :nonono: Always looking to DISCREDIT THE COMPETITION, sadly this is how todays boxing fans are. They have NO RESPECT! To Say Bradley Hasn't Done Anything And Then IN THE SAME THREAD Try To Turn Around And Hype Up Khan...THAT IS LAUGHABLE!

And who is num 1 now do you believe his win over Witter had nothing to do with it??After Paulie M lost to Hatton who became num 1??And the Witter win was the main reason why.. You said you become the no1 when you beat the no1.....that turned out to be false. Stop backtracking. Khan doesnt have to beat Bradley. Bradley is not "the man". All Khan has to do is have as good as or better resume, better performances and be a more skilled fighter. And hes well on his way to doing that. Fuk Bradley.

According to Ring. But when Bradley beat him, he didnt become the num 1. But you said..... ........... And who is num 1 now do you believe his win over Witter had nothing to do with it??After Paulie M lost to Hatton who became num 1??And the Witter win was the main reason why..

Witter was pants man, didnt really rate the guy at all. Bradley got lucky avoiding Hatton and going after Witter for the WBC belt

You are really not making any sense whatsoever you say you can’t be no1 in the division without beating no1. Hatton was the No1 guy in the division not Witter. I’m not sure what you mean buy saying Hatton was the champ so he is not what you are talking about? You need to stop trying so hard you go round in circles and really it is you who is making yourself look quite the clown. :nono: Witter was ranked num1(which Bradley is now)and Bradley beat him,I don't know why we talking about Hatton for on the rankings he is listed as the Champ..Bradley is now in the same place Witter was when he beat him..So Bradley beat a num 1 ranked fighter,so he beat the num 1 ranked fighter..And Now he is the num 1 fighter..Is what I'm saying wrong if so help me understand why that is..

Not understanding,was Witter not the num 1 ranked WW?? According to Ring. But when Bradley beat him, he didnt become the num 1. But you said..... Can't be num 1 without beating num 1 everyone knows that.. ...........

............ Not understanding,was Witter not the num 1 ranked WW??

Hey dumbazz we are talking about the num 1 spot and Bradley beat the guy ranked num1..Paulie M would have never even been ranked num 1 if Bradley did not beat Witter..Your hate for Bradley has you sounding like a clown..Hatton was the Champion he has nothing to do with what we are talking about.. You are really not making any sense whatsoever you say you can’t be no1 in the division without beating no1. Hatton was the No1 guy in the division not Witter. I’m not sure what you mean buy saying Hatton was the champ so he is not what you are talking about? You need to stop trying so hard you go round in circles and really it is you who is making yourself look quite the clown. :nono:

Hey dumbazz we are talking about the num 1 spot and Bradley beat the guy ranked num1..Paulie M would have never even been ranked num 1 if Bradley did not beat Witter..Your hate for Bradley has you sounding like a clown..Hatton was the Champion he has nothing to do with what we are talking about.. Can't be num 1 without beating num 1 everyone knows that..Nice try tho.. ............

Bradley beat a shot to sh*t Witter, who already lost to Kotelnik. Witter was never an A-class fighter to begin with. Prime Witter loses to prime Hatton, prime Cotto and prime Tszyu. Prime Witter already lost to Judah and Kotelnik. So if Judah and Kotelnik were able to beat prime Witter, what makes Bradley's victory over past prime Witter so good? :thinking: ??Kottie beat Witter??I think you might wanna check that again..Oh and him losing to all those fighter would never happen because it never happened..None of those fighters ever steped in the ring with Witter..Sooo..Try again..

You said you have to beat the no1 to become no1 dumbass. Keep up with your own stupid points. And he didnt beat the man. Cos Hatton was the man. Hey dumbazz we are talking about the num 1 spot and Bradley beat the guy ranked num1..Paulie M would have never even been ranked num 1 if Bradley did not beat Witter..Your hate for Bradley has you sounding like a clown..Hatton was the Champion he has nothing to do with what we are talking about..