Just wondering, Floyd Mayweather and his family (Sr., Roger, etc) consider him to be the greatest boxer ever, better than SRR and Ali.
Now on the other hand all of them consider Pacquiao to be a complete bum. In Floyd Mayweather Sr's recent interview posted here he said outright that Pacquiao has ZERO skill, and is a complete joke of a fighter but the only reason he's winning is cus he's doping.
So let me ask you this, should the "Greatest Fighter of All Time" be able to handle a complete unskilled bum who's simply been taking some performance enhancing drug?
Just to give you an example, I consider myself an alright fighter and I personally would not be afraid to fight a zero skilled complete BUM off the street even if they were on performance enhancing drugs because I still feel they would pose no threat.
So if Floyd is the greatest fighter of all time, why is a complete no skilled journeyman loser bum such a threat just because he took a little something or other to enhance his physique? Shouldn't the greatest fighter of all time match up quite well against a complete bum with zero skill even if that bum is on some steroids?
how about you go find a dictionary & look up the word sarcasm.
HOMO.
Maybe I misunderstood you. Are you actually agreeing with me? I hope so since 92.31% of posters here do according to my poll. LOL
same recycled garbage as usual. what you're saying here is you don't have any opinion. you're just going with whatever the mayweathers want you to think.
think about the ts' question for once and stop dickriding. i'll repeat it for you:
do YOU think the greatest boxer ever be able to beat a bum on roids? that's the question and your answer is the same recycled garbage people already knew about.
thank you for calling out the flomo
I'm going to assume you already know the answer. But to really bring it home for you, here's the real answer:
Because Arum and Team Pacquiao never thought to bring up those same questions you pose during the negotiations. Much less before the negotiations for the fight started.
In their view, OST's was a fair proposal to make the fight happen. That is, until the excuses from the Pac camp started flying in.
same recycled garbage as usual. what you're saying here is you don't have any opinion. you're just going with whatever the mayweathers want you to think.
think about the ts' question for once and stop dickriding. i'll repeat it for you:
do YOU think the greatest boxer ever be able to beat a bum on roids? that's the question and your answer is the same recycled garbage people already knew about.
The problem with your statement is that the Mayweathers don't consider Pacquiao a "great". So why make him take a test if he's a complete BUM with zero skill. According to them he's not a 'great' so why should there be an even playing field when there already isn't one since Floyd is The Greatest Of All Time and the skill disparity is endless?
I'm going to assume you already know the answer. But to really bring it home for you, here's the real answer:
Because Arum and Team Pacquiao never thought to bring up those same questions you pose during the negotiations. Much less before the negotiations for the fight started.
In their view, OST's was a fair proposal to make the fight happen. That is, until the excuses from the Pac camp started flying in.
How bout they both take a blood test, that way we have to greats going at it with nothing in them, just pure talent..
The problem with your statement is that the Mayweathers don't consider Pacquiao a "great". So why make him take a test if he's a complete BUM with zero skill. According to them he's not a 'great' so why should there be an even playing field when there already isn't one since Floyd is The Greatest Of All Time and the skill disparity is endless?
Just wondering, Floyd Mayweather and his family (Sr., Roger, etc) consider him to be the greatest boxer ever, better than SRR and Ali.
Now on the other hand all of them consider Pacquiao to be a complete bum. In Floyd Mayweather Sr's recent interview posted here he said outright that Pacquiao has ZERO skill, and is a complete joke of a fighter but the only reason he's winning is cus he's doping.
So let me ask you this, should the "Greatest Fighter of All Time" be able to handle a complete unskilled bum who's simply been taking some performance enhancing drug?
Just to give you an example, I consider myself an alright fighter and I personally would not be afraid to fight a zero skilled complete BUM off the street even if they were on performance enhancing drugs because I still feel they would pose no threat.
So if Floyd is the greatest fighter of all time, why is a complete no skilled journeyman loser bum such a threat just because he took a little something or other to enhance his physique? Shouldn't the greatest fighter of all time match up quite well against a complete bum with zero skill even if that bum is on some steroids?
How bout they both take a blood test, that way we have to greats going at it with nothing in them, just pure talent..
even if there was no test and floyd ALLOWED Pac openly to take steroids for the match, since Pac is considered a completely unskilled BUM by the Mayweathers, shouldn't the self proclaimed Greatest Fighter of All Time still be able to defeat him easily?
In one syllable?
Yes.
Nope.
A blessed talented athlete who works hard his/her entire life will not even come close to a person who has taken steroids for a month.
That is the kind of performance increases steroids provide. That above sentence isn't even mine, E:60 had a story on steroids and a man interviewed for E:60 said that.
LMAO! you're kidding right? That means every bum and unskilled worthless turd off the street would be dominating every single sport in the EARTH without any training. Why are hard working athletes still at the top of every sport? What a joke of a statement
Nope.
A blessed talented athlete who works hard his/her entire life will not even come close to a person who has taken steroids for a month.
That is the kind of performance increases steroids provide. That above sentence isn't even mine, E:60 had a story on steroids and a man interviewed for E:60 said that.
if Floyd was so confident that the skill disparity between him and Pac was so huge, then steroids wouldn't even matter. Floyd would OPENLY challenge Pac to take steroids into their fight and still beat him. But yet there's huge fear from the Mayweather camp for some reason.
I flat out refuse to discuss the fight aswell.
And on the subject of steroids, if strength mattered so much then every bum on the street would be walking into a gym juiced up thinking they hit harder than Sonny Liston.
I'll ANYONE $1000 if they can walk into a gym on steroids, and knock a boxer out.
They'd get their a$$ handed to them in seconds
thank you for proving my point.
I'm 5'6 145. I'm confident that I have the boxing skills to beat just about any bum off that the street on steroids. Roids give you "strength" not skill. So an ATG? That bum would get washed. I will not apply my thinking to Pac-PBF because I refuse to discuss it.
I flat out refuse to discuss the fight aswell.
And on the subject of steroids, if strength mattered so much then every bum on the street would be walking into a gym juiced up thinking they hit harder than Sonny Liston.
I'll ANYONE $1000 if they can walk into a gym on steroids, and knock a boxer out.
They'd get their a$$ handed to them in seconds
Floyd is taking the same random drug test.
Makes the ass whoopin' he'll lay on the Pacman all the more legit.
But of course, not everyone wants to see the Pacman lose to Floyd.
At least not at the moment.
Give it some time.
even if there was no test and floyd ALLOWED Pac openly to take steroids for the match, since Pac is considered a completely unskilled BUM by the Mayweathers, shouldn't the self proclaimed Greatest Fighter of All Time still be able to defeat him easily?
Floyd is taking the same random drug test.
Makes the ass whoopin' he'll lay on the Pacman all the more legit.
But of course, not everyone wants to see the Pacman lose to Floyd.
At least not at the moment.
Give it some time.
What merit are you referring to, a he-say-she-say comment, discussion, or the discounting of one man from another shouldnt play into your thought process.
So the Mayweather's have bashed PaQ, ducked (according to some) and accused him, but still PaQ is a GREAT FIGHTER(yes)?,? but shouldn't have problems confronting those critics/antics in this case a very worthwhile foe... PaQ has created all this mayhem, all he simply had to do was say YES..
Instead he made excuses to why he couldnt take a blood test the day of a fight, had he been a credited Olympic boxer, rather then an poverty-driven pro he and Floyd may have fought already!!
TAKE THE TEST PAC
Ok that's all fine and good, but even if he DID take the test and came back positive for steroids, shouldn't the self proclaimed Greatest Fighter of All Time still be able to destroy him? They said Pac is a complete bum with zero skill, why should steroids scare the Greatest Fighter of All Time. Shouldn't he still be able to beat Pac even on steroids?
My argument: If roids can turn a complete no skilled bum into someone that can pose a threat to the ATG / GOAT then why isn't every single bum off the street journeyman taking roids and becoming an ATG???
What merit are you referring to, a he-say-she-say comment, discussion, or the discounting of one man from another shouldnt play into your thought process.
So the Mayweather's have bashed PaQ, ducked (according to some) and accused him, but still PaQ is a GREAT FIGHTER(yes)?,? but shouldn't have problems confronting those critics/antics in this case a very worthwhile foe... PaQ has created all this mayhem, all he simply had to do was say YES..
Instead he made excuses to why he couldnt take a blood test the day of a fight, had he been a credited Olympic boxer, rather then an poverty-driven pro he and Floyd may have fought already!!
TAKE THE TEST PAC
thank you for confirming that the ATG/GOAT should be able to easily dispose of a bum who is simply stronger due to roids.
I wish women would accept what I said as fact like that...