pound for pound debate for the top fighters of our generation, i always see who is greater than who, or who can beat who, better resune, better skills and blah blah. if i can peak enough interest, i will reveal my idea.
What is it to just stop going into those kinda of threads??
honestly Rome, I decided to no longer discuss Pac/mayweather, just useless, you can't get a decenct logical debate
nah I'm sitting here at work, and I was thinking take the 32 top fighters from the 90's to today , put them in 4 sets of 8, seed them from 1-8, then have people vote on the match up which would be based on head to head, ability and resume. but then I thought Pac and mayweather would just get voted for based off of popularity. bad idea moving on